|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-07-2002, 05:09 PM | #21 |
Hoplite Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,931
|
The problem here as has been pointednout before is that the Prof. changed his mind over the years.
My sources I IF recall properly are the book of LT or UT for athletic Galadriel The same for Olorin The others I BELIEVE I scoped out in Com. Guide to ME However, I would defer to those greater than I on these accounts.
__________________
About Eowyn, Does anyone know what her alias Dernhelm means? She was kown as dernhelm because of her exclaimation when she realized that the rider's headgear was heavy and obscured her sight. 'Dern Helm" Culled from Entmoot From Kirinski 57 and Wayfarer. |
01-07-2002, 07:09 PM | #22 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 319
|
RE
posted by Aretelaugh:
Quote:
How about Finrod Felagund and Sauron's magical duel in "Of Beren and Luthien" I don't think there was and physical involvement there on either part. I can't see why Elf women such as Galadriel and Luthien couldn't battle Maiar in this way? |
|
01-08-2002, 01:35 AM | #23 | |
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 9
|
Re: RE
Quote:
Galadriel's strongest ability seems to be in the enchantment of objects or places so I wonder what she might have created if she knew what she would be facing. I wonder what effect a Galadriel created artifact (such as the Phial) would have had on the Balrog. I wonder if Gandalf had had more time he might have made a much better showing with the Balrog. The White Council (which included Galadriel) when acting in concert seemed to be pretty capable. Moving a little further into the land of wild speculations... There seems to be a trend in Tolkien's writing to the effect that the more focused a spirit (Maiar or Vala) becomes on either it's incarnation or the more domination the spirit puts forth the the more weaker the spirit becomes. A Balrog is very focused on it's incarnation so it might have a weakness for song... |
|
01-08-2002, 02:16 AM | #24 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 319
|
RE
I was under the impression that the 'poetry' in the battle between Finrod and Sauron was merely an interpretation of the 'magical' duel, in the same way as the 'music' of the Ainur was an interpretation of the magical forces used to create the world.
I doubt that all Luthien's enchantments could achieve was to make someone fall asleep. Perhaps she knew that she couldn't do much harm to Morgoth, and so, to prevent attention being drawn to herself by assaulting Melkor with a song that caused offensive damage, she wisely chose to make him fall asleep, the only viable option under the circumstances. Perhaps against a lesser enemy like a Balrog she could have done it harm rather than cast a bewildering enchantment on it. Out of interest does it say anywhere that Galadriel created the phial? I was always under the impression that it was given to her. Galadriel never seemed to share her love of craft like her kin among the Noldor. Quote:
In Tolkien's world, unlike many other Fantasy stories out there, the power of the individual is paramount, the role of magical objects are very secondary and no one seems to rely on them in the stories of Middle Earth to a great degree. Of course there's the One Ring but that was basicaly 90% of Sauron I would imagine that Galadriel would have battled in a very similar way to Luthien. Last edited by Captain Stern : 01-08-2002 at 03:11 AM. |
|
01-08-2002, 04:01 AM | #25 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 9
|
Re: RE
I quite agree that the poetry is an interpretation of the experience of watching the battle between Finrod and Sauron but that does not preclude the possibility that they actually used song as the medium for the battle. Music can be a very powerful thing and contending themes of music seems a complex enough medium for a test of wills or spirits.
As for the music of the Ainur, I would assume that Eru, or the Ainur, could make the experience appear to a mortal in any form they chose. How a mortal would describe the experience of witnessing the Music of the Ainur seems a very moot point. Still the Silmarillion describes the Music of the Ainur not as being 'like' music but as 'being' music. Could music at that time had properties it does not latter have? Who has heard a Vala sing? Luthien definitely had a winning strategy and that's what matters. Still in Tolkien you don't see much of the heavy artillery type of magic and you especially don't see it between individuals. Gandalf does a little in the Hobbit and LOTR but by and large the most powerful magics are enchantments (Anduril, the Ring, Lorien). I did not want to imply the Galadriel could not throw a fireball at Balrog but they she probably would choose a different strategy (as Luthien did). The Phial of Galadriel is described as being; "In this phial is ... caught the light of Eärendil's star, set amid the waters of my fountain. " While she doesn't explicitly that she made it, it was made from her fountain. I have the impression from my readings that the Noldor made a lot of lesser 'magic items', but that we do not hear about them because they do not directly involve the story. Additionally the major items the Noldor made are so powerful that they sort of overwhelm everything else. I'm not so sure I follow you when you say you think that the role of the magic item are very secondary in Tolkien. What would you say about the Simarills? |
01-08-2002, 04:21 AM | #26 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 319
|
RE
I pretty much agree with you.
Quote:
In Tolkien's world individuals are far more important than any items, with the huge exception of, as you pointed out, the silmarills to which the very fate of Arda was bound.
__________________
Then hate overcame Fëanor's fear, and he cursed Melkor and bade him be gone, saying 'Get thee gone from my gate, thou jail-crow of Mandos!' And he shut the doors of his house in the face of the mightiest of all dwellers in Eä. |
|
01-08-2002, 09:05 AM | #27 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 608
|
The Balrogs were probably more powerful than Sauron, they were just bred to believe him superior. They were unconcerned with riches, power, tactics etc. and their brute strength and FIRE, I know Sauron's hands 'burnt with a black flame' but the Balrogs could command it, would have overcome many foes. They were bred to drive dragons into battle so they must have been hard as nails.
Oh yeah, individuals' virtues are much more important than weapons etc, especially courage intelligence and magicness. |
01-08-2002, 09:37 AM | #28 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 319
|
RE
Quote:
QUOTE]The Balrogs were probably more powerful than Sauron, they were just bred to believe him superior. They were unconcerned with riches, power, tactics etc. and their brute strength and FIRE, I know Sauron's hands 'burnt with a black flame' but the Balrogs could command it, would have overcome many foes. They were bred to drive dragons into battle so they must have been hard as nails.[/QUOTE] The revised Balrogs were not bred, they were Maiar, Sauron WAS superior to them, this didn't need to be drilled into their minds. The Balrog's were not more powerful than Sauron. Sauron was said to be the greatest of the Maiar. If a Balrog was more powerful than Sauron then there is no way that Gandalf could have overcome Durin's Bane. Quote:
Another point to add to the general discussion: It's accepted that Sauron's power had diminished by the 3rd Age, so couldn't this then be the case with Durin's Bane? It would go a long way towards explaining Gandalf's slaying of the Balrog.
__________________
Then hate overcame Fëanor's fear, and he cursed Melkor and bade him be gone, saying 'Get thee gone from my gate, thou jail-crow of Mandos!' And he shut the doors of his house in the face of the mightiest of all dwellers in Eä. Last edited by Captain Stern : 01-08-2002 at 09:39 AM. |
||
01-08-2002, 11:16 AM | #29 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bree
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
|
|
01-08-2002, 11:56 AM | #30 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
A hearty welcome to the Moot, Arete. As for the question, "who has heard a Vala sing", that would be all of the Calaquendi, that is, all of the Elves who went to Aman at the behest of the Valar and dwelt therein in the light of the Two Trees. These would be the Vanyar, the Noldor, and [most of] the Teleri.
As for the rest of the discussion, the powers of Galadriel, whether any Elves could best a Balrog in the Third Age, the differentiation between poetry and magic, etc., I'm gonna bow out of this one, as I'm re-reading the Silmarillion and want to be a bit better informed on the topics in question. I know, out of character for me, but we all learn and grow, right? However, as for the "Balrogs being more powerful than Sauron", sorry, that's simply not the case. Of the servants of the Great Enemy, Morgoth: "...Among those of his servants that have names the greatest was that spirit whom the eldar called Sauron, or Gorthaur the Cruel". Gothmog having a name, not even he was greater than Sauron, chief lieutenant of, and heir to the throne of, Morgoth the Enemy.
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. |
01-08-2002, 01:00 PM | #31 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 608
|
Alright, not bred, but they were changed when they allied themselves with Morgoth and forsook the other Valar.
What's with Melkor and Morgoth, are they the same valar or have I got it wrong from the start? |
01-08-2002, 01:49 PM | #32 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22
|
Hi, i'm pretty new around here, just thought i'd make an input.
First, is Gandalf/Mithrander/Olorin etc. a Maia? I had always assumed that he and his Brethren were creatures created by the Vala,maybe with the intervention of Eru, much as the Dwarves and Ents were, just EXCEPTIONALLY powerful ones. Second, couldn't the Balrog's power have faded like that of the other creatures of Middle Earth?????? After all, Sauron was weakened (through the loss of his Ring), perhaps in agreeing to serve Melkor and falling from grace just as he did, they became bound to himm so they were diminished by his banishment????? Just a little theory from a young Tolkien nut
__________________
"There are no turtles anywhere (except normal ones)" |
01-08-2002, 02:24 PM | #33 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 192
|
Quote:
That is possible, though I don't remember Sauron weakening exept losing possibility to make himself beautiful. Ofcourse losing the Ring weakened him, but that had nothing to do with fall of Morgoth. I may be wrong, though and it might be possible. I don't have certain knowledge about it. |
|
01-08-2002, 03:13 PM | #34 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bree
Posts: 148
|
Melkor and Morgoth were one in the same. Feanor originated the name Morgoth after the silmarils were stolen.
Melkor is a Quenya name meaning 'He who arises in might' where as Morgoth is Sindarin meaning 'black foe or enemy'. |
01-08-2002, 03:44 PM | #35 | ||
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
Yes you are quite right! What I should have said was "Who heard the Music of the Ainur?" Furthermore I think that listening to the Vala sing, even after Eä was created, must have been a very enlighting experience for the elves present. I'm not so sure I would include '[most of] the Teleri" in the elves who went to Aman. I thought there were still quite a few Teleri in Beleriand and the West of Middle-Earth when the Noldor returned. I could be wrong. Quote:
"And Arien Morgoth feared with a great fear, but dared not come nigh her, having indeed no longer the power; for as he grew in malice, and sent forth from himself the evil that he conceived in lies and creatures of wickedness, his might passed into them and was dispersed, and he himself became ever more bound to the earth, unwilling to issue from his dark strongholds." I think that a literal interpretation is what is intended here. Morgoth's spirit was literally being drained away and dispersed. I think Sauron probably had the same problem. Beside being no longer capable of assuming a fair form Sauron I think he had probably lost a great many other abilities as well. It is a tribute to the power of their spirits that they could cause as much trouble for as long as they did! FYI Arien is the loyal/good Maia that guided the Sun, being originally a spirit of fire (probably akin to the Balrogs) not seduced by Morgoth. |
||
01-08-2002, 04:01 PM | #36 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
Welcome to the Moot, EdBlackadder!
"...I'm not so sure I would include '[most of] the Teleri" in the elves who went to Aman. I thought there were still quite a few Teleri in Beleriand and the West of Middle-Earth when the Noldor returned..." Arete: The qualification, "most of the Teleri" reflected that many of that strain of the Eldar remained in Middle-Earth and had never gone to Valinor; also, it reflects those of the Teleri who dwelt in Alqualonde and never went through the Calacirya to mingle among the Valar. Also, maybe you mean "who heard the Music of Iluvatar"? In THAT case, no Child of Iluvatar ever heard it, only the Valar, Maiar, and those other spirits who never left Iluvatar to enter the World. As for the question whether Olorin/Mithrandir/Gandalf was a Maiar, yes he was, and is listed as the "wisest of the Maiar" in the Silmarillion, "valaquenta", pages 24-25 . All the Istari were Maiar.
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. |
01-09-2002, 03:29 PM | #37 | ||
Hobbit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks for the clarification, i've never spotted the link between Gandalf and the Maia before. Its strange, i've read that a dozen times and never spotted it. I agree with AreteLaugh, that reference seems to be meant literally. It always seemed to me that Sauron and Morgoth etc. are most powerful in the area where they were physically present, while the others could function just as well, if not better, in spirit. Is the price they paid for their betrayal, losing the ability to affect a wider area directly? Thanks for the welcome and the feedback
__________________
"There are no turtles anywhere (except normal ones)" |
||
01-09-2002, 04:41 PM | #38 | |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
Melkor and Sauron became physical, and thus gained much greater power over the physical realm. However, the price for this was that they lost much of thier power in other areas, and, as noted, they were very much 'localized'. You see this to some degree in the good Valar, as well. Tulkas and Orome, for example, as the most 'physical' of the Valar, (although they had not lost the ability to be anything else) are very powerful in the physical realm, but certainly nowhere near the power of Ulmo and Manwe, who had power throughout Water and Air, respectively.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
|
01-09-2002, 06:16 PM | #39 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
"It always seemed to me that Sauron and Morgoth etc. are most powerful in the area where they were physically present, while the others could function just as well, if not better, in spirit. Is the price they paid for their betrayal, losing the ability to affect a wider area directly?"
Wow. Good questions, and unfortunately, ones to which my EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMEDDCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO skills can find no answer. Good answer, though, Wayfarer; however, I do not think Tulkas' and Orome's lesser power than Aule or Manwe or Ulmo has as much to do with being more "physical." Melkor was the "mightiest of those ainur who came into the World"; second was Manwe, who was "lord of the realm of Arda and ruler of all who dwell therein"; Ulmo , Lord of the Waters, was "next in might to Manwe"; and Aule "has might little less than Ulmo". All quotes from the Silmarillion, "Valaquenta", "Of the Valar", pages 18-20. I tell you folks, this discussion group has REALLY honed my Tolkien skills, and has greatly increased my understanding of both Lord of the Rings and The Silmarilion. You people are like a whetstone to a blade!
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. Last edited by bropous : 01-09-2002 at 06:17 PM. |
01-09-2002, 06:23 PM | #40 | |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
Just as Melkor invested his power into matter, giving him power over it, severely weakened his power in other areas, so their physicality prevents them from using thier powers in the same way that others of the valar could. The fact that they're weaker is completely seperate.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
balrogs | den | Middle Earth | 22 | 10-30-2003 08:10 PM |
Powerful creatures of ME | Jonathan | Middle Earth | 62 | 04-20-2003 12:02 PM |
Was Frodo really a "hero" in the end? | stormcrow | Lord of the Rings Books | 29 | 09-23-2001 09:52 PM |
Dragons vs Balrogs | easterlinge | The Silmarillion | 61 | 05-28-2001 01:17 AM |
The nature of Balrogs | Captain Stern | The Silmarillion | 17 | 02-26-2001 10:01 AM |