07-20-2005, 04:04 AM | #21 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Quote:
It's not that we're inherently superior, it's just that they're stuck in the Middle Ages?? Hmm. Forgive me sir, but in the light of your second proposition I doubt the sincerity of the first. Last edited by The Gaffer : 07-20-2005 at 04:08 AM. |
|
07-20-2005, 08:15 AM | #22 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
ok, how about both
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
07-20-2005, 09:59 AM | #23 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Well, that would be consistent at least...
|
07-20-2005, 11:11 AM | #24 |
Spammer of the Happy Thread
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 3,512
|
I haven't much joined this discussion, because I was afraid that it'd turn out like this.. I also feel that I know too little about both Islam and Christianity since I haven't read the Koran nor the entire Bible. But now that I look through what people have written.. I feel like I'm not the only one who should learn more about this before they say anything.
How can someone even think of blaiming an entire religion for something that a fraction of fundamentalists have done? I know a few muslims, and they're the nicest and most polite persons I've met. I'm just a bit shocked how it still is possible to generalize like this.. Some people never learn, it seems.
__________________
"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. " - C. Sagan My (photography) website My Flickr page |
07-20-2005, 11:26 AM | #25 |
The Blobbit
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kent, England (Not Oxford! ... yet...)
Posts: 1,596
|
Forgive me, the tone intended was not conveyed.
As to the blaming of an entire religion, I'm going to play the double standards card. It's perfectly fine to justify attacks on British civilians because of what a fraction of the British people support.
__________________
Janny's Songs Janny's lyrics and random photographs Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who happen to be walking about. ~ Mercutio... erm, GK Chesterton. |
07-20-2005, 11:46 AM | #26 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
That joker ain't wild in this game, janny. Nobody is saying it's OK to attack British civilians for anything. Call me a boring old centrist, but just because I disagree that there is an inherent problem with Islam doesn't mean that I think it's OK to plant bombs on tube trains.
I agree with you, Nerdy but Nice (and clearly Sensible) One. To my mind one of the major causes is putting words in people's mouths, such as thinking that to explain the causes of an act is the same as justifying it. |
07-20-2005, 01:19 PM | #27 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
07-20-2005, 02:41 PM | #28 | ||
The Blobbit
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kent, England (Not Oxford! ... yet...)
Posts: 1,596
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Janny's Songs Janny's lyrics and random photographs Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of all classes, our ancestors. It is the democracy of the dead. Tradition refuses to submit to the small and arrogant oligarchy of those who happen to be walking about. ~ Mercutio... erm, GK Chesterton. |
||
07-21-2005, 03:37 AM | #29 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Quote:
If that is what you mean, I still don't see the problem. It may be more convenient to consider them as just "evil", but that won't help prevent the same thing happening again. Understanding does not equal condoning, simple as that. One of the reasons why it is important to do this is because it helps untangle the situation a bit. These London bombers, it seems, led fairly normal lives and could in no way be regarded as oppressed. So, posing the "but" question helps us to trace the route of their motives. Consider Mandela and the ANC, for example. The SA government regarded them as terrorists, as did Thatcher, and they did indeed advocate an armed struggle. Many of their methods are standard parts of the terrorist repertiore. "But" theirs was a just cause, and they did not use the same sort of extreme tactics we're seeing here, targeted at ordinary people. I don't see any way in which it is not a good thing to improve our understanding of the process whereby a person arrives at the state of mind in which they will blow themselves up on a crowded train. |
|
07-21-2005, 08:57 AM | #30 |
Death of Mooters and [Entmoot] Internal Affairs
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,870
|
Rumours of new explosions in London: http://www.sky.com/skynews/article/0...189833,00.html
__________________
Fëanor - Innocence incarnated Still, Aikanáro 'till the Last battle. |
07-21-2005, 12:39 PM | #31 |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
you dont see this as tragic? do you also think the holocaust wasnt one of the biggest tragedies in our recent history?
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
07-21-2005, 12:57 PM | #32 |
Lady of Letters
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Either Oxford or Kent, England
Posts: 2,476
|
Only if you use "tragic" in its loosest sense, to mean "something sad". That word can cover any event from the Holocaust to acts of terrorism to accidents to natural disasters. I don't think it's helpful to lump together deliberate mass murder with causeless events - especially since the reason you did it in this case was to imply that it was as wrong to look for reason in this event as to apportion blame for any other "tragedy".
|
07-21-2005, 01:14 PM | #33 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
07-21-2005, 01:17 PM | #34 |
Lady of Letters
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Either Oxford or Kent, England
Posts: 2,476
|
I see, you only want to look for reasons you agree with. Because when people started talking about links to Islam, you said they were "taking advantage of it to promote a biased agenda".
|
07-21-2005, 01:50 PM | #35 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
Saying "Islamists are more violent then christians" certainly doesnt help us solve this TRAGIC event. Nor does it enlighten us as to what we need to do to lessen the likelihood of it happening again. When we suggest that we look into why they are mad/disgruntled/out of touch/insane so that we can get a better grip on the situation we are told that’s sympathizing with them. Your attempt to turn the tables on me and say because I will not consider Islam as a RELIGION to be dangerous and therefore the root of the problem is extremely disingenuous since you wont consider anything else. Apparently you have proof this had nothing whatsoever to do with the situation in Iraq? If a man robs a bank do you not want to know WHY he did it? Or is that irrelevant and liberally pandering to “sympathies” because a “crime” only deserves stereotyping and castigating not trying to understand the mind of the perpetrator. The enormous flaw in your logic is that you wont listen to the reasoning of the bomber because you consider it giving in or endorsement somehow.
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
07-21-2005, 02:49 PM | #36 | |
Lady of Letters
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Either Oxford or Kent, England
Posts: 2,476
|
I absolutely think we should look for the causes of this behaviour, but I think we have to explore the possibility that one of these causes is something inherent to Islam. At least, I don't think that rejecting the idea out of hand is going to get us anywhere.
Let me quote from what I said above: Quote:
|
|
07-21-2005, 03:04 PM | #37 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
plus, even if it was true, it's not a very productive line of reasoning... have you ever tried to mess with someone's religious beliefs before?
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
07-21-2005, 03:17 PM | #38 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
07-21-2005, 10:23 PM | #39 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
I'd like someone with a bit more acquaintance with the Koran to list some verses calling for peace. I am acquainted with the ones declaring all non-Islamics to be fair game and to be converted at pain of death. NOT that they really mean that, of course, because the events in London are all peaceful explosions, RIGHT?
Pardon my cynicism, but where's the Koran say turn the other cheek? Or is that too cheeky and not politically correct enough?
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
07-22-2005, 02:41 AM | #40 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
...well put....I don't think we should hold our breath for the answer.
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
marriage | katya | General Messages | 384 | 01-21-2012 12:13 AM |
Book V; ch IX and X. The Last Debate and The Black Gate Opens | crickhollow | LOTR Discussion Project | 33 | 02-29-2008 10:28 AM |
REAL debate thread for RELIGION | Ruinel | General Messages | 1439 | 04-01-2005 02:47 PM |
Insidious, Lief and R*an debate all things great and small. | Lief Erikson | General Messages | 139 | 09-12-2004 01:36 AM |
The Official Entmoot Presidential Debate | Tessar | General Messages | 83 | 03-20-2004 02:47 PM |