Entmoot
 


Go Back   Entmoot > J.R.R. Tolkien > Lord of the Rings Movies
FAQ Members List Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-28-2000, 09:57 PM   #1
Blazez
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The problem with the Fellowship of the Ring

Looking at it from a film maker's point of view, FotR is drastically differant from the other two books. Why? Well basically, it doesn't feature the major battles that we see in the other two. Obviously, these can be a major draw to the uninitiated, but they may never go to the TT and RotK if they judge the FotR to be too lame. Of course, the yarn has its fair share of action, but maybe not enough to satisfy the Gladiator junkies out there.

This is why PJ is putting in the last alliance bit I believe. He can show off his MASSIVE and give us a taste of the great battles to come.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2000, 10:21 PM   #2
IronParrot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The problem with the Fellowship of the Ring

I agree.

I think for the uninitiated, Fellowship will have a similar effect as TPM if it isn't done right. As in, non-fans won't like it because you only see what is actually just the beginning, and not a full middle or end. That's exactly why I see LOTR not as three separate novels but the way it was intended to be seen - one novel in six books that just happens to be published in three volumes.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2000, 11:50 PM   #3
bmilder
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The problem with the Fellowship of the Ring

Well, there is action in FotR. No battles, but there are terrifying chases by the Black Riders, and then of course there is the magnificent duel between Gandalf and the Balrog. There's also the ambush by Orcs on the Anduin, the fight in the Chamber of Mazarbul, the encounter with the Wargs, the Watcher in the Water, etc. No epic battles in there, certainly, but it's not action-free either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2000, 02:48 PM   #4
etherealunicorn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: The problem with the Fellowship of the Ring

Indeed! I like FotR in part because the action is, well, not more subtle, but it is more human in the conflicts. Certainly big battle scenes make for good action, but there is a certain amount of dehumanizing inherent in battle, even fantasy battles like in these books. Even if one does not recognize it with the head, I think that it is grasped by the gut and to be truthful, I think that most people do tend to think with the gut. As such, I think that FotR will probably translate pretty well. And some of the scenes, such as the flight to the ford and the battle with the balrog are just awesome! And with them, the scene won't be cluttered up with a lot of unrelated battlefield action, so the focus can go where it belongs-on the specific conflict in question for the scene.
  Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What All Was Wrong with PJ's LOTR Wally Lord of the Rings Movies 425 08-14-2016 08:43 AM
How to take a Ring from an unwilling Ring-wielder? - crazy ideas Gordis Middle Earth 217 10-03-2013 03:43 PM
Stranger than fiction... Real "Rings" frodosampippinmerry Lord of the Rings Books 15 03-09-2009 07:55 PM
Ring's sentience and Ring detection Gordis Lord of the Rings Books 17 01-04-2008 09:37 AM
Why did the Ring betray Isildur? Nurvingiel Middle Earth 138 12-24-2007 01:52 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 1997-2019, The Tolkien Trail