![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Could I Read It First?
I went to check out FOTR from the library, but of course, it was checked out, but Silmarillion wasn't. Could I read that first, or would it spoil anything?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 31
|
It has been a while since I read the Silmarillion, but I don't think it would spoil FoTR. You should be aware though that the Silmarillion is written more like an epic (like the Iliad? Maybe this isn't the best analogy) than most Fantasy/SF books. Browse through it for a while and see if you like it. If you do, check it out. Most people get introduced to Tolkein through the Hobbit, and then LoTR though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Well, I have read the Hobbit. I've heard that the Silmarillion (can I just call it the Sil?) can be compared to the Bible, but being Christian, I find that kind of writing pretty interesting. Thanks for the warning.
(And I don't want to start no religious debates, y'hear? IM me for that) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 479
|
I actually found it to be less like reading the Bible and more like reading a book of Greek myths. The focus is on the narrative. Pretty much everyone involved is either related to gods or non-god (can't say mortal) but highborn in some way (princes, kings, cousins to kings, half god and so on). The only reason I say Greek is because that's what I'm more familiar with, being raised in a western culture and because the stories almost always end in a tragic way. You get introduced to a noble character and watch him do great things, and then it almost always ends badly in the end, maybe because of a prophecy, oath, or curse.
I'm not trying to be very analytical or rigorous about the comparison. I'm just trying to describe the sensation I had when I read it. The Bible gives me a totally different feeling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
I would say that if you are going to attempt the Sil. before the LotRs, you may find it to be a bit difficult. Although it is the history of LotRs, you seem to be able to understand the Sil better if you have read LotRs first. I would suggest that you skip the section entitled, (Of The Rings Of Power And The third Age) which is at the very end of the book. It may give things away from LotRs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 31
|
Mirelle, I think you hit the nail on the head. That's probably why I was thinking of the Iliad. I'm going to have to read the Sil again soon. I don't think I've read it since my first time, and that was many years ago...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York State
Posts: 309
|
To Starr Polish
Hi, Little sister in the Lord--
IMHO, I would wait until you've read the Hobbit and LOtR before attacking the Silmarillion. Since it is actually comprised of a couple of different works, and Professor T didn't complete it before he died, I got a headache the first time I read it, ![]() Reading the other books first will give you a much better frame of reference when tackling the Sil, which can get confusing. Can't you find and inexpensive paperback set of the trilogy, if $$ is an issue? It's too late for Christmas, but maybe you could ask for an early birthday present. ![]()
__________________
FRODO LIVES!! (sung to the tune of "My Boyfriend's Back") Now, Gandalf's back, and you're gonna be in trouble (Hey-la, hey-la---Now, Gandalf's back) Soon, Barad-dur is gonna be a pile of rubble (Hey-la, hey-la---Now, Gandalf's back) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Ah, birthday presents have to be set aside as well, I'm going to Spain this summer
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York State
Posts: 309
|
"Gone with the WIND???"
You musta been reading "Gone With the WHIRLwind!!"
![]()
__________________
FRODO LIVES!! (sung to the tune of "My Boyfriend's Back") Now, Gandalf's back, and you're gonna be in trouble (Hey-la, hey-la---Now, Gandalf's back) Soon, Barad-dur is gonna be a pile of rubble (Hey-la, hey-la---Now, Gandalf's back) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Actually...
Tolkien woul dhave rather published the Silmarillion before the LOTR, so I would assume it's ok to read it first. I remember him saying something about '...publising it after the lord of hte rings, since the right time to do so had passed'
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Well that's nothing. I know a girl who read through the Bible in a week. She did it during Christmas break though, and read literally, ALL afternoon (from 1 pm to 10 pm).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
*/has read massive amounts in a short time as well.
My benchmark is something like a thousand page novel keeps me for a day. I read through the entire wheel of time series in my study hall last year. Even the awful last one. none took more than two days, and those are the most boring books I've ever read. a GOOD book of the same length might take three to six hours.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Land of Cheese
Posts: 13
|
Well, I have read The Silmarillion, and I reccomend it, if you have a long attention span. It is a great book, but to me it was more boring than any other book Iv'e read. But it is still really good.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: a castle made of clouds
Posts: 459
|
Quote:
__________________
Human kind cannot bear very much reality. dreamflower - for all things Lady Galadriel Last edited by galadriel : 01-18-2002 at 01:58 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 12
|
I would say that if you are someone that reads a lot anyway, then it would not be a bad thing to start off on the Silm. If you do just take it slowly. Read carefully and thurouly.
It does have a chapter devoted to the war of the ring, a sumery of LOTR, but you can leave that out, I think it is the best of the books. However a lot of people would be put off starting on the silm. Like many have said it is very differant in style and difficulty to LOTR. Which is the story that hooks most people. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Read before posting a problem | Ben | Feedback and Tech Problems | 9 | 10-18-2011 01:44 PM |
In what order to read the writings of Tolkien | jtoney08 | Lord of the Rings Books | 17 | 02-07-2008 06:18 PM |
This book is a bit too hard to read at times... | Peter_20 | The Silmarillion | 24 | 03-30-2007 10:02 AM |
books to read and books not to read | Gil-Galad 2.0 | Lord of the Rings Books | 25 | 07-29-2006 12:21 AM |
Can admins read PMs I send to another mooter? | Bombadillo | Feedback and Tech Problems | 28 | 09-30-2005 05:33 PM |