12-15-2001, 03:58 PM | #1 |
Retired Ent
Join Date: Sep 1999
Posts: 60,631
|
Entmoot's first review of the movie!!
(Note: This may contain minor spoilers)
I had the opportunity to go to the North American premiere of the most anticipated film of all time. The excitement was palpable sitting in the darkened theater, a week before general release, with Peter Jackson, Elijah Wood, and other cast members in the audience. To sum it up: "Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" is a triumph of cinema and art which does justice to Tolkien's work. I came to the movie with an open mind - I hadn't read the books in over a year, and had intentionally avoided most major movie "spoilers." That being said, I felt that the movie captured the spirit of the story without hanging on every word from the text. "Harry Potter" was an enjoyable experience, but it required (and assumed) prior familiarity to fully understand and appreciate it. Peter Jackson's LotR, on the other hand, is more than just an excellent copy of literature: it stands by itself as a wholly separate work. Omissions of beloved scenes are hardly noticed with the quick pace of the story. The transition from the Shire to Bree is smooth. Certainly Tom Bombadil would have been a joy to see onscreen, but the episode would have tacked on another half hour to an already very long movie and perhaps tested the patience of nonfans. Yet even at three hours, the time breezes past. Middle-earth has truly been brought to life. New Zealand's natural beauty provides ideal landscapes. The idyllic Shire is shown just as we had all imagined. The grotesque orcs and Balrog are terrifying. The evil atmosphere of Moria, Isengard, and Mordor is chilling, leaving the viewer anxious for a more extended glimpse into the Land of Shadow. Another admirable aspect of the film is that even with epic battles and CG monsters, appropriate time is given to develop the major characters, the story's heart and soul. Frodo's friendship with Sam is given due prominence, and Ian McKellen's Gandalf is superb. A small gripe of mine is that the minor characters were not given the individuality that they deserved: by the end, I was still unsure over which Hobbit was Merry and which was Pippin; and Legolas and Gimli were peripheral figures. However, given that their friendship is more a focus in The Two Towers, this is not a big problem. The film is destined to become a classic (and gross hundreds of millions of dollars in the process!). After such a long wait, the success is a satisfying relief. I will undoubtedly return to see it again many times, and I've already started counting the days until December 2002!
__________________
---Ben formerly known in the forums as bmilder Owner of The Tolkien Trail and Entmoot. Buy Entmoot shirts and mugs! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LotR movie review | pulchritudinous | Lord of the Rings Movies | 3 | 09-22-2006 11:49 AM |
New movie review reveals major changes... SPOILERS | Elf Girl | Lord of the Rings Movies | 14 | 12-10-2003 06:01 PM |
My Movie Review | Sister Golden Hair | Lord of the Rings Movies | 18 | 01-19-2002 01:36 AM |
Entmoots second review | samwise of the shire | Lord of the Rings Movies | 0 | 12-20-2001 01:24 AM |
Bakshi movie review | Morkhon | Lord of the Rings Books | 10 | 11-26-2000 06:10 AM |