07-03-2004, 04:58 PM | #1 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: potsdam ny
Posts: 2
|
hobbit culture
in the books and movies, it seems like hobbits are culturally in our 18th or 19th century (clothing, ect.), but the Gondorians and Rohan seem to be in the middle ages. Has anybody else noticed this?
|
07-03-2004, 05:06 PM | #2 |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Yes imrahil, JRRT seems to have presented the Shire as something from times not long past in the English countryside. We don't, otoh, see things we associate strongly with the Industrial Revolution.
btw - Welcome to Entmoot! We always encourage new members to post in "The Official Welcome Thread" at the top of General Messages forum, as a way of introducing themselves. So please do so. Beyond that, happy posting in areas of your own interest. Let me know if you have questions.
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
07-03-2004, 05:09 PM | #3 |
The Intermittent One
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here and there
Posts: 4,671
|
welcome to the 'moot, imrahil!
i will comment on your discussion later! nice topic BTW |
07-03-2004, 10:19 PM | #4 |
AngAdan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 856
|
Hobbit culture:
Finely mince one hobbit, mix with nutrient broth, and smear on multiple petri dishes. |
07-07-2004, 12:43 PM | #5 | |
Rohirrim Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 590
|
Re: hobbit culture
Quote:
|
|
07-07-2004, 03:06 PM | #6 | |
Elven Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
The smoking mills (introduced by Isengard) are another example of industrialization in the Shire. What the Shire lacks, in terms of industrial age culture, is factories, cities, railroads, steam ships, firearms (actually a precursor to the industrial age), and the usual social ills which accompanied those things. |
|
07-08-2004, 10:33 AM | #7 | ||
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 54
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
07-08-2004, 12:22 PM | #8 | ||
Elven Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
Quote:
There is no escaping the obvious anacronisms, which can only be explained by the assumption of lost technology (as steam power was discovered and then abandoned by the Roman empire). |
||
07-09-2004, 11:53 AM | #9 |
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 54
|
Michael, what I think I meant was that I don't disagree with your opinion that the Shire was "industrialized", I only thought that perhaps the clocks and umbrellas weren't really exactly like our clocks and umbrellas (or like the ones of the Industrial Age), but devices with the same function and not less developed than ours.
But I admit that in such a case, we would have a problem knowing which things really are what they are called in the text, and which ones are not. Perhaps my quote only concerns 'enhancing phrases' like "like an express train" and "hell-hawks". |
07-09-2004, 12:16 PM | #10 |
Elven Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 892
|
"Express train" is a narrative expression intended only for the reader's consumption. It in no way implies anything about the fictional world. That passage is one of the most-often mis-cited passages in the book.
That said, I AM a literalist. That puts me squarely on the opposite of many issues from a great number of people. I don't understand why people want to recast the vivid images in terms of "interpretation" and "reading". We all miss things on the first, second, third, and subsequent readings. So, I am not talking about how people miss things. I am talking about how, if something in its literal sense doesn't fit in with a reader's point-of-view, suddenly the story has to take on a whole new meaning. And then we have an interpretation which doesn't fit with the facts. There are ambiguities, of course. Take what I said about the Red Book versus what you said. Technically, we're both correct. There are portions of The Lord of the Rings which are allegedly attributed to the Red Book -- the supposed citations in Appendix A, for example. And what about the songs? And the Elvish? Those must be assumed to be translations or direct lifts from the Red Book, right? And what about the native names? Not Sam, Frodo, Smeagol, or Eowyn, but Fangorn, Celeborn, Arvedui, and Aragorn. There is plenty of room for interpretationg and reading there. Where does the Red Book end and The Lord of the Rings begin? I think that is a matter for opinion. But the facts of things which are said to exist in that world -- clocks, umbrellas, gunpowder -- people try to explain them away because of one fallacious complaint: they are not "medieval". Gunpowder is, of course, "medieval" because it came from the medieval period. And ironically, chain mail -- one of the "surest" signs of medievality in the story -- is NOT medieval. It comes from the classical Mediterranean world. The real issue seems to be that people assume Middle-earth is supposed to be like medieval Europe -- but few of us really have much detailed knowledge about medieval Europe, and so we all have these idealized visions of what medieval Europe (or, it may be more appropriate to say, stories based on medieval Europe) should look like. Hence, when we run into these little "inconsistencies" in the LoTR text, we feel the need to explain them away. Otherwise, Middle-earth cannot be medieval, can it? And it is NOT medieval -- not in the sense that most readers want it to be. It certainly draws upon medieval literature and medieval conventions for many things. But it doesn't limit itself to medieval Europe, and in fact explores a great many details of other times and cultures. The literalist's point-of-view is that it's okay to have clocks and umbrellas in Middle-earth. It doesn't matter if they have digital faces or just an hour hand turned by a little fairy trapped in a cage. All that matters is that, if the story says there is a clock and the clock in itself makes sense, then there is no need for interpretation and reading (with or without the quotes). And the literalist point-of-view embraces the literary analysis, too. That includes all the medieval ideas, all the narrative tricks used to make the world seem familiar to the modern reader, etc. |
07-09-2004, 03:48 PM | #11 |
Spammer of the Happy Thread
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 3,512
|
Re: hobbit culture
I guess many things in the different places remind of different times, but I don't think Tolkien wanted to or felt like he had to follow this in any strict way.
sorry if I'm being confusing, my head is gone.
__________________
"Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. " - C. Sagan My (photography) website My Flickr page |
10-09-2004, 02:50 PM | #12 | |
Elven Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 892
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Hobbit and the deeper mythology | azalea | The Hobbit (book) | 22 | 10-22-2009 10:01 PM |
The N-word and ghetto sadness/stupidity | The Telcontarion | General Messages | 39 | 02-20-2007 12:45 PM |
One Hungry Hobbit | Yodaman | Writer's Workshop | 2 | 10-14-2004 01:32 PM |
Declaration Of The Rights Of The Hobbit | The Lady of Ithilien | Lord of the Rings Books | 13 | 12-21-2002 02:45 PM |
Is Gollum a hobbit or a weird frog thing??? | Samwise_Gamgee | Lord of the Rings Books | 21 | 04-11-2002 01:10 AM |