11-22-2005, 09:46 PM | #1 |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
Smoking Ban/County Wide
I live in Akron Ohio, in the county of Summit, which covers multiple communities. A "smoking ban" has been put into effect for the entire county with exemptions to bowling alleys and bars that are considered private clubs. Under the terms of the ban, you may not smoke in any public establishment or 10 feet from its entrance. In a smaller clause attached, you may not smoke outside of your residence if you are 10 feet from another residence that may choose to object. If you are found in violation of the new ordinace, you will be fined $150.00, your first offense.
It is my opinion that the government, be it federal, state or local, has no place in making this mandatory. Businesses should have the right to make that choice and not be required to conform to a decision that they believe will effect their revenues. Many owners that are non-smokers were against this, and find it to be unconstitutional. I also find it to be quite a political play on the part of Akron. Akron is the largest community in the county, and they are discussing making the downtown area exempt from the law. In that case, Akron has everything to gain. All surrounding communities will flock here on Friday and Saturday night for a funfilled weekend of eating, smoking, and drinking. There are smoking bans in effect in certian cities nationwide. This will be the first county wide ban in the U.S. Thoughts?
__________________
"Whither go you?" she said. "North away." he said: "to the swords, and the siege, and the walls of defence - that yet for a while in Beleriand rivers may run clean, leaves spring, and birds build their nests, ere Night comes." AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide |
11-22-2005, 11:20 PM | #2 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
I fully support bans on smoking. I don't think people who work in restaurants (primarily the servers) should be exposed to second-hand smoke. Second-hand smoke has been proven to be harmful. People shouldn't be forced to seek other employment just because they want to avoid the health costs of second-hand smoke.
Customers of restaurants and other establishments should also not be forced to take their business elsewhere to avoid second-hand smoke. In BC, you aren't even allowed to smoke in bars. There is no smoking in any public places. Though there was some bumpiness in adjusting to the new bylaws (mainly, bar and pub owners worried they'd lose business), this bylaw works flawlessly now. Plus, since the rule applies to all bars and pubs, they have not lost business AFAIK. I don't see that people would stop going out altogether just because they can't smoke. This may occur, but I doubt in significant numbers. Great thread SGH.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-22-2005, 11:22 PM | #3 | |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Quote:
Workplace smoking and certain public locations, I can accept, but this harassment of every single place is just too much. NYC has really made it difficult for smokers too. Yet the governments want smokers to pay $34 for a carton of cigaretts and not let them be smoked.
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Last edited by Spock : 11-22-2005 at 11:24 PM. |
|
11-22-2005, 11:24 PM | #4 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
I have no problem with people smoking in their own homes, or outside (unless it's in a confined place like the patio of a restaurant, but often you're still allowed to smoke there).
The issue for me is not smoking, which people have the right to do, but second-hand smoke. People do not have the right to get other people sick with their second-hand smoke.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-22-2005, 11:28 PM | #5 | |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Quote:
|
|
11-22-2005, 11:36 PM | #6 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Okay, that did come across a bit wrong.
But I assert people do not have the right to put second-hand smoke in a public space*. Logically that leaves their own personal space, and outside. *where other people are quite likely to breathe it (since technically outside is private too).
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-22-2005, 11:42 PM | #7 |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
Here's the issue with me: the government only benefits from smokers. The government has everything to gain by charging outragious taxes on smoking products, and at the same time making it hard to smoke it. So, I have to agree with Spock in that aspect. Privately owned businesses should have a choice on making their establishments smoke free or not. If you are a non smoker then go patronize a non smoking establishment. Not every establishment should have to become smoke free because non smokers want catered to. Bottom line, it should be a choice by the owner of the establishment, not government controlled.
__________________
"Whither go you?" she said. "North away." he said: "to the swords, and the siege, and the walls of defence - that yet for a while in Beleriand rivers may run clean, leaves spring, and birds build their nests, ere Night comes." AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide |
11-22-2005, 11:52 PM | #8 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Spock and SGH, you guys bring up a good point about government control.
However, is it still fair to the people that work in those environments? Do you think someone with asthma or another respitory problem, or someone who wants to avoid the effects of second-hand smoke, should have to find a different job? The government does already regulate what ill effects employees can be exposed too.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-23-2005, 12:16 AM | #9 | |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
Quote:
__________________
"Whither go you?" she said. "North away." he said: "to the swords, and the siege, and the walls of defence - that yet for a while in Beleriand rivers may run clean, leaves spring, and birds build their nests, ere Night comes." AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide |
|
11-23-2005, 01:26 AM | #10 |
Cardboard Harp of Gondor Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IM IN UR POSTZ, EDITIN' UR WURDZ
Posts: 6,433
|
I think smoking bans are fine, and I support them 100%. I wish they were more widely used and enforced.
I don't think it's right at all for people to be allowed to indulge a habit in public that's actually worse for the people around them than it is for them. That's like saying that it should be legal to fire a gun at random in public--oh yeah, it might not hurt the shooter, but it just might nail someone walking by. As a singer, I can't stand it when people smoke because second hand smoke can do a lot of damage to the vocal cords. I wish the government would just outlaw smoking period. End of story. You can't smoke in the United States. |
11-23-2005, 03:02 AM | #11 | |
Entmoot Attorney-General,
Equilibrating the Scales of Justice, Administrator ♎ Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,891
|
Quote:
However, I can't possibly image the government can make a profit from smoking, no matter the tax on smokes. Smoking-related diseases cost society huge sums of money and from a non-smoking taxpayer's point of view, a smoking ban would definitely be good. Same thing with alcohol. If alcohol was banned, society would save incredibly large sums of money.
__________________
An unwritten post is a delightful universe of infinite possibilities. Set down one word, however, and it immediately becomes earthbound. Set down one sentence and it’s halfway to being just like every other bloody entry that’s ever been written. ☻ |
|
11-23-2005, 04:09 AM | #12 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
SGH, there's a ban on smoking in the whole county except Akron? I don't get it.
Asbestos is harmful. You're not allowed to use it anymore, in brake pads or insulation and AFAIK industry. There are old buildings that still have asbestos in them though. Without the smoking ban, establishments choose to allow smoking. But with a ban for all establishments, it's still fair.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-23-2005, 09:54 AM | #13 |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Wow. The government benefits from smoking? Does that that into account the Medicare and Medicaid expenses for the smoking related illnessess? Does it include the billions in tobacco subsidies? If tobacco where a new product it would never make it to market. Anything that restricts smoking is a pure benefit to the general welfare.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
11-23-2005, 09:59 AM | #14 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
massachusetts has effectively passed a statewide smoking ban... there are no towns i know of that allow it anymore, anywhere
i do not have a problem with the concept in general, i do have a problem with the fact that, in massachusetts, there are no exceptions whatsoever... even bars are completely banned from smoking in practice, what this means is that you get a situation like the prohabition on alcohol... smaller bars keep ashtrays under the counter, let their regulars smoke, and work out deals with the local police so that they turn their heads i think smoking licenses should be allowed, much like liquor licenses... this way at least there will be places where people who wish to smoke can go... from the workers pov, there are thousands of restaurants to be employed at, and if a handful allowed smoking, those who object to it could very easily find employment elsewhere remember, smoking is really no different from drinking... while one can die from second hand smoke, one can also die by getting hit by a drunk driver on his way home from a bar... yet we allow one and do not allow the other
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
11-23-2005, 10:12 AM | #15 |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
I agree with the statement regarding drinking. If we are to be consistent in the application of the law then we must decide if personal freedom outweighs public safety and the general welfare. Either legalize all controlled substances or control them with a single philosophy that the public welfare supercedes the personal freedom. We regulate all sorts of behaviors and prohibit some all together on this legal basis. The fact that it is not consistently applied is the true source of irritation for me. Pot smokers are imprisoned and cigarette smokers expect to be able to smoke anywhere. Where is the logic?
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
11-23-2005, 10:24 AM | #16 | |||
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Whither go you?" she said. "North away." he said: "to the swords, and the siege, and the walls of defence - that yet for a while in Beleriand rivers may run clean, leaves spring, and birds build their nests, ere Night comes." AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide |
|||
11-23-2005, 10:50 AM | #17 |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
So far, in community after community, the effects of banning smoking has proven to be neutral at worst. Every new community that goes through it always kicks and screams about the end of business but after the fact they tend to lose a few smokers and gain a few non-smokers and not a lot changes. And then all the fussing and kicking and screaming dies down. I would imagine Akron would not benefit nearly as as you think they will. I would think you will get an influx of smokers but youll get a lot of non-smokers and families leaving the downtown area (now choked with thousands of smokers) for non-smoking places elsewhere. In the end you probably wont see a huge swing one way or the other.
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
11-23-2005, 11:04 AM | #18 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
another problem is litter... brookline mass was one of the first places to ban smoking entirely... it is a suburb very close to boston and somewhat upscale... always kept very clean
when they passed the no-smoking laws they also instituted a "no-smoking with x-feet of an establishment"... as a result, they removed all the ashtrays that had been set up on almost every corner i worked in that area during that time, and within weeks the sidewalks and streets were constantly choked with cigarette butts when you make these kind of laws, you have to account for the human tendency to do what one wants to do no matter what the law says
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
11-23-2005, 12:46 PM | #19 | |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Quote:
SGH can take it for a bit. All this lack of ___ (fill in the blank) has gotten to me. ---------------------------------- Have you ever noticed how some days you just get washed over by the sense of cosmic emptiness and lack of meaning? Last edited by Tessar : 11-23-2005 at 04:31 PM. Reason: pot shot |
|
11-23-2005, 05:13 PM | #20 | |
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Narnia
Posts: 1,656
|
Quote:
So has Delaware.
__________________
Mike nodded. A sombre nod. The nod Napoleon might have given if somebody had met him in 1812 and said, "So, you're back from Moscow, eh?". Interested in C.S. Lewis? Visit the forum dedicated to one of Tolkien's greatest contemporaries. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
do you like your movies full screen or wide screen? | HOBBIT | Entertainment Forum | 21 | 11-23-2004 05:36 PM |
Smoking | Ben | General Messages | 256 | 05-11-2004 08:45 AM |
Giving up smoking | Dunadan | General Messages | 154 | 03-17-2003 09:47 AM |