|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-23-2006, 07:09 PM | #1 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Were the Nazgul incapable of suicide? (Even though it wasn’t such a bad idea)
I would think it is very likely that at least one of the Nazgul wished to end his existence in Middle Earth. Aside from all the considerable disadvantages to living as a wraith, there is the fact that in Tolkien’s universe Men’s spirits sought to leave the world after a certain amount of time. Whether or not one believes that he would like to live forever in the real world, in Tolkien’s it is a given that Men do not, even if they don’t know it.
Early in the Third Age the Nazgul had the opportunity to end their “lives”. Sauron’s spirit was very weak and he didn’t have either the One or the nine rings. Any of the Nazgul who wished could have traveled to Orodruin and cast their rings into the fire. But there is the catch. I would guess that, just like Frodo, they were entirely incapable of destroying their rings (I guess this part is pretty obvious). It is even possible that Gandalf knew that Frodo would be unable to even attempt to damage the Ring because of rumors concerning failed Nazgul suicide attempts (a little unlikely, I think) or maybe just by reasoning that since the Nazgul were all still “alive” they were unable to willingly destroy their rings. Any thoughts? |
06-23-2006, 10:16 PM | #2 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
This might interest you:
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/ringfaq.htm#Q79-SauronHeld(last revised 21 July 2002 ) Were the Nazgûl wearing their Rings at the time of The Lord of the Rings? Though this question does occasion perennial controversy on r.a.b.t, the great weight of the evidence supports the conclusion that Sauron had them. Evidence that Sauron had them Most importantly, Tolkien says so in a lot of places: “... Sauron, who still through their nine rings (which he held) had primary control. ...” [L #246 (331), also on the Web] Gandalf tells Frodo, “the Nine [Sauron] has gathered to himself; the Seven also, or else they are destroyed.” [LotR I 2 (65)] Galadriel tells Frodo that, looking in her mirror, “You saw the Eye of him that holds the Seven and the Nine.” [LotR II 7 (386)] In “The Hunt for the Ring”, we read of Sauron’s “mightiest servants, the Ring-wraiths, who had no will but his own, being each utterly subservient to the ring that had enslaved him, which Sauron held.” [UT: HR (338)] In another version of “The Hunt for the Ring”, again we read that the Ringwraiths “were entirely enslaved to their Nine Rings, which [Sauron] now himself held”. [UT: HR (343)] (Thanks to Conrad Dunkerson for pointing out several of the above.) From these quotes it seems fairly clear that Tolkien conceived that Sauron had direct physical possession of the Nine Rings, not indirect possession through having the Nine on the fingers of his slaves. I really don’t see any other way to read the quotes from Letters and the two versions of “The Hunt for the Ring”. Furthermore, the two quotes from The Lord of the Rings link the Seven and Nine as “held” in the same way, and we know for certain that Sauron had physical possession of those of the Seven that were still in existence. Beyond quotes, some physical circumstances suggest that the Nazgûl did not wear their rings. These are merely suggestive, not conclusive in themselves: The Nazgûl’s black robes were visible. If they were wearing Great Rings, we would have expected their clothes to be invisible too. On Weathertop, after he put on the One Ring, Frodo could see the Nazgûl’s mantles, robes, hair color, helms, “haggard hands”, and swords, as well as the Witch-king’s crown and knife. [LotR I 11 (212)] There is no mention of his seeing their Rings. Yet we know that while merely carrying the Ring in Lórien Frodo could see Galadriel’s Ring: “it cannot be hidden from the Ring-bearer, and one who has seen the Eye,” she tells him [LotR II 7 (384)]. (Those who don’t accept this line of reasoning can point out that the attack at Weathertop occurred before Frodo had seen the Eye.) When the Witch-king was destroyed on the Pelennor Fields, no Ring was found. Since the Nine Rings had gems, it would have sparkled in the sun; though of course it could have been missed in long grass. Evidence that the Nazgûl still wore the Nine Rings Only one citation goes that way, as far as I know, namely Gandalf’s remark at the Council of Elrond: “The Nine the Nazgûl keep.” [LotR II 2 (267)] In a previous edition of this FAQ I tried to explain the quote away as inverted word order for “The Nine keep the Nazgûl [in Sauron’s thralldom].” But I believe a simpler and better explanation is external: Tolkien intended at one time that the Nazgûl should still be wearing their Rings, but he later changed his mind and simply missed revising that sentence. Conrad Dunkerson supports this view with textual evidence from The History of Middle-earth: [r.a.b.t article, 17 Feb 2002, archived here]: “Tolkien wrote the ‘Nine the Nazgûl keep’ line during one of the drafts of the Council of Elrond. Then much later he wrote that the Nazgûl were increased in power before the Battle of the Pelennor Fields because Sauron had returned their Rings to them. If Sauron was only returning the Rings at that point then Tolkien could not have intended that they were wearing them at the time of the Council.” Apart from texts, some have argued that the Nazgûl must have been wearing their Rings, or else they would have aged as Bilbo did. But the cases are not parallel: Bilbo had not become a wraith, and we have no reason to think that a wraith would age or change in any way, being no longer in the physical world. Also, Gollum was centuries older than Bilbo, but he showed no signs at all of aging in the seven decades after he lost his Ring. (For that matter, Bilbo didn’t age very much after giving up the One Ring, until after it was destroyed.) Conclusion While not quite one-sided, the textual evidence favors very strongly indeed the conclusion that, at the end of the Third Age, Sauron had physical possession of the Nine Rings. Physical circumstances also suggest this, though other explanations are possible. But the physical evidence is well reinforced by direct textual evidence, against a single quote that says the opposite. You decide! (What is not known is just when Sauron took the Nine Rings back from the Nazgûl, assuming that he did. We know it was some time before the Nazgûl began hunting for the One Ring, but whether it was immediately before or much earlier we cannot tell. That Sauron, even without the One, could get the Nazgûl to give up the Nine Rings, there is little doubt, since no mortal could have withheld even the One from him.) |
06-24-2006, 05:43 AM | #3 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: here and there
Posts: 3,514
|
people tend to forget Tolkien was writing a story , not a legal water-tight document.
What is wrong with gandalf, beleieving at the council that the nine held them? they knew not for sure, i see no inconsitency with gandalf beleiving this. Sauron beleived they would never attempt to destroy the ring! Tolkien would have no problem with this, whether it is or isn't a contradiction, simply because it cannot be one since his character beleived this (right or wrong )to be the case at the council - that is all, it makes not one iota of difference to anything else.... it is abundantly clear even Elrond was not 100% certain, nor Gandalf nor Galadriel what would happen on the demise of the One - how could they know for sure? Jonathon - perhaps you should re-read the question? We are talking about the period between the finger slicer (TM Valandil) and son's family on-location butcher business's attempted final-cut and the re-emergence of sauron up prior to the time of 'the war of the rings' ... question is, do they have the rings THEN ... presumably yes - for one look at the Witch King of Angmar. did Sauron on his re-emergence then re-take one by one the rings from the Nine? what i have never understood is this: Since the one on the hand of sauron would control and bind all the other rings ... why did it not do so when he HAD it on his hand in full power before the armies of Gil-galad and Elendil popped on by for a rumble? At the point of it's forging when Big Cele became aware of its intention - did they all, as quick as whores dropping their knickers, take off their rings??? Last edited by Butterbeer : 06-24-2006 at 05:44 AM. |
06-24-2006, 07:26 AM | #4 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Thank you for your reply Jon, but Butterbeer is right. You will notice I began the second paragraph “Early in the Third Age”.
I have seen this exact argument before, and I absolutely agree that Sauron took the Nazguls’ rings at some point. But this doesn’t really apply to the idea I posted here because the Nazgul probably kept their rings for at least a thousand years during the first part of the Third Age. Quote:
|
|
06-24-2006, 07:37 AM | #5 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2006, 10:49 AM | #6 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
My name is not short for Jonathan - it's Jon.
CAB, yes, I read your original note carefully. That's why I took the time to cut and paste the FAQ excerpt here. Did you (and Butterbeer) read this part (emphasis added)? >> (What is not known is just when Sauron took the Nine Rings back from the Nazgûl, assuming that he did. We know it was some time before the Nazgûl began hunting for the One Ring, but whether it was immediately before or much earlier we cannot tell. That Sauron, even without the One, could get the Nazgûl to give up the Nine Rings, there is little doubt, since no mortal could have withheld even the One from him.) If not, now that you have, do you have additional thoughts to share on the suicide question? EDIT: P.S. >> I would think it is very likely that at least one of the Nazgul wished to end his existence in Middle Earth. Even accepting this as true (I have my doubts), why so soon? Why not after, say, 10,000 years? Or 6,000? Or 12,000? The point being perhaps what you're doing here is more projecting what you would think and do in a similar situation than describing accurately what the 9 ex-kings felt and wanted. Last edited by Jon S. : 06-24-2006 at 10:58 AM. |
06-24-2006, 11:05 AM | #7 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
Quote:
"But the Elves were not so lightly to be caught. As soon as Sauron set the One Ring upon his finger they were aware of him; and they knew him, and perceived that he would be master of them, and of all that they wrought. Then in anger and fear they took off their rings." Last edited by Jon S. : 06-24-2006 at 11:10 AM. |
|
06-24-2006, 11:54 AM | #8 | ||||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
By the way Jon, I do appreciate you cutting/pasting the FAQ. Like I said, I have seen it before (I think Gordis posted a link to it once), but maybe some of the others here haven’t. I think it is a pretty solid argument. |
||||
06-24-2006, 03:59 PM | #9 | |
Spaceman Spiff
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the belly of a Firefly, living in Serenity is where you'll find me
Posts: 1,438
|
Quote:
There isn't a lot known about the Nine Rings right? Maybe some of the power that Sauron put into them was to robe them of this thought. Make them 'forget' about the desire to leave Middle-Earth. I mean, they weren't designed to be given to say.....hobbits, or dragons, or whatever, right? I don't know much about the lore of the Rings of Power. I've only read The Hobbit and the LotR series so most of what I know I've picked up here. Which I am most thankful for. You see, I'm lazy and if someone can just tell me the info without me having to do the work to look it up, I'll take it.
__________________
Do you hear that? |
|
06-24-2006, 04:51 PM | #10 | |||||
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
I agree with most of what you say CAB.
My thoughts: 1. Nazgul may have been suicidal because of the weariness of their fëar. Indeed even the Elven fear were not supposed to endure for long in the Mortal Lands - the Elves either departed for Valinor, or faded. How long did it take them to grow weary of the World? about 6.500 years for Elrond the Half-Elven, about the same for Galadriel. And note, for 3000 years out of 6500 they were protected from fading by their Rings. Celeborn, Erestor and K, though had no Rings, still lived for 3000 years in the Elvish ring-protected enclaves - Imladris and Lorien. Cirdan, the most enduring, stayed in ME from the very begginning, and was protected by his Ring for only about a 1000 years. (I count the time when the Rings were actually wielded). Anyway, as there is talk of the Lingerers- faded Elves, I guess, quite a number (who didn't depart) faded much sooner - in 3000-4000 years Their hroar were consumed by their fëar. The fëar of Men were never meant to endure so long within the Circles of the World. CAB is right, 400 years was clearly not enough for them, but Elros laid down his life at 550 - I guess it was his choice, as he has grown weary. If not, I guess, in 1000 years most men would have been tired of living. Nazgul knew all about it, of course, their lives seemed endless, but at the end each day was a weariness. Now they couldn't give their Rings away, and they couldn't destroy them - so they turned into wraiths. The question is: Were the wraiths continuing to feel "world-weariness", as they did when living, or did they become "happy wraiths "? We don't know for sure, but the nazgul, when they appear in LOTR, do not seem to be world-weary. They have a sense of humour (laughing at Frodo at the Ford and at Gandalf at the Gate), seem to have some vanity (WK's crown at the Gates of Minas-Tirith) and hopes for the future - like hoping to rule Gondor and/or Arnor. 2. So there is a second possibility: the nazgul were suicidal, NOT from the World-weariness, but because of the loss of freedom. Of course, whether they were "Kings, sorcerers or warriors of old", they were not the kind who enjoyed being enslaved. And they tasted freedom again in the Third Age, having lost their Rings only quite recently (70 years ago, if I am right, or 1000 years ago, if CAB is right - but even in this case there was "relative freedom" until Sauroin returned to Mordor). 3. And, as I have quite recently pointed out in "Gollum" thread, they may have been not suicidal at all, but only hoped to become free with the One Ring's and Sauron's destruction, believing that the destruction of the One does not necessarily entail the loss of power of the Nine. Now your other points, CAB. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
John S: We all agree, as far as I know, with your point about the Nazgul Rings being in Sauron's keeping at the END of the Third Age. Thank you for posting the quote from this excellent FAQ thread. Quote:
The question WHEN Sauron got the 9 rings was much debated in my thread "Were the Nazgul free from Sauron...". I would be happy to hear your opinion. Last edited by Gordis : 06-24-2006 at 04:55 PM. |
|||||
06-24-2006, 05:05 PM | #11 | |||
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Quote:
Indeed Rings look after themselves. The possessor is incapable to harm his Ring (look at Celebrimbor! Look at Frodo!), often incapable to give it away or to keep it locked somewhere and not to use it (though the Elves managed to keep them unused, and Bilbo and Cirdan and Gil-Galad gave away their Rings). Bilbo says: Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
06-24-2006, 05:23 PM | #12 | |
Spaceman Spiff
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In the belly of a Firefly, living in Serenity is where you'll find me
Posts: 1,438
|
Quote:
__________________
Do you hear that? |
|
06-24-2006, 05:32 PM | #13 |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Well Sauron attacked Hollin, killed Celebrimbor, who made the Rings, but only found 7 and 9. As for the Three, the Elves hid them: one (Nenya) was given to Galadriel and two were sent to Lindon. Vilya came to Gil-Galad (later to Elrond), Narya was given to Cirdan (and later to Gandalf). So Sauron didn't touch the Three.
As for your theory, it may hold, yes. |
06-24-2006, 05:37 PM | #14 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2006, 05:48 PM | #15 | |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Quote:
Interesting this part about Isildur... It seems the guy didn't even know that he was to live VERY long, and that he would become a wraith, and then he would really need his Ring. Heirloom of the house, indeed! |
|
06-24-2006, 05:57 PM | #16 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
|
|
06-24-2006, 06:18 PM | #17 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
I don't have any more or better answers to these questions than everyone else has already expressed, I just want to thank Landroval for the laugh.
>> Thror gave his ring to Thrain and the elves passed on the rings like bongs |
06-24-2006, 06:34 PM | #18 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: here and there
Posts: 3,514
|
and thrain kinda to Thorin .... er... just how did he (Thrain) keep it secret from undercover S the Necromancer in Dol Guldor? Up his jacksy??? ..would not the red hot pokers have noticed?????????? sorry Jon ... thought you were Johnathon the swede .... knowing me, probably wasn't paying attention... and..er .. in that case, hello btw ! yeah, elves and bongs ... flowers and long hair ... trees and woodstock ... Last edited by Butterbeer : 06-24-2006 at 06:36 PM. |
06-24-2006, 06:41 PM | #19 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
06-24-2006, 06:46 PM | #20 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: here and there
Posts: 3,514
|
oh yeah ..sorry- i was thinking of the key... and the map .... ... obviously neither would be of interest to sauron!
**edit*# - well i must away ere break of day ... get some sleep, ere my mind gets more addled ... night all. BB Last edited by Butterbeer : 06-24-2006 at 06:50 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nazgul horses | Gordis | Lord of the Rings Books | 98 | 09-12-2006 02:39 PM |
Were the Nazgul free from Sauron for the most part of the Third Age? | Gordis | Middle Earth | 141 | 07-09-2006 07:16 PM |
Discussion Thread Number 3 Of Wraiths-Kings-Friends-Rings Campaign | Gordis | RPG Forum | 1000 | 11-29-2005 05:35 PM |
*Discussion Thread* Of Nazgûl-Kings-Friends-Rings Campaign (Calling all Nazgûl II) | Grey_Wolf | RPG Forum | 1000 | 10-04-2005 05:26 AM |
anti american sentiments | afro-elf | General Messages | 207 | 07-29-2002 08:47 PM |