12-31-2004, 11:28 AM | #1 |
Fëanorophobic
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the pages of a book
Posts: 1,417
|
Tolkien: Style or Substance?
This is a topic that has been bothering me for some time: what makes Tolkien so popular? Is it because his writing style is exceptional or because of the stories themselves? Or is it both?
I personally don't find Tolkien's style all that (that sounds almost like blasphemy on the Moot ) but, seriously, I only find some passages to be extremely well written (and of course the poetry) but for the rest of his work...the style seems ordinary. What do you guys think? |
01-02-2005, 02:27 AM | #2 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I dwell in possibility.
Posts: 247
|
His work just has such grandeur and a sense of epic history about it. The plotlines are interesting and highly entertaining, and the themes have a sense of importance and are easy to take to heart (though I'm sure I'm not doing a particularly good job of explaining my point on that).
__________________
"...then how shall I Revive the dying tones of minstrelsy, Which linger yet about lone gothic arches, In dark green ivy, and among wild larches?" Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum. |
01-02-2005, 06:28 AM | #3 | |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
|
01-02-2005, 09:55 AM | #4 | |
Fëanorophobic
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the pages of a book
Posts: 1,417
|
Quote:
Does that mean you prefer the story itself over the style? |
|
01-02-2005, 11:14 AM | #5 |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
I vote for substance. The style is good, but it's the content that got me hooked.
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! |
01-02-2005, 12:24 PM | #6 |
Warrior of the House of Hador
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,651
|
I think in LotR it's more substance thatn style (even thought the style is good to), but in The Sil I'd say it was both. His style is more poetic in the SIl than it is in LotR.
__________________
Then Huor spoke and said: "Yet if it stands but a little while, then out of your house shall come the hope of Elves and Men. This I say to you, lord, with the eyes of death: though we part here for ever, and I shall not look on your white walls again, from you and me a new star shall arise. Farewell!" The Silmarillion, Nirnaeth Arnoediad, Page 230 |
01-02-2005, 02:13 PM | #7 |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
The Sil! The style was ick! If it wasn't for the content...I would have NEVER bothered to read the whole thing! IMO the writing style of the Silmarillion made reading it torture....like a dry textbook...
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! |
01-02-2005, 02:31 PM | #8 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
The style of the Silmarillion wasn't exactly one of its strong points, sadly enough. I still maintain that if Tolkien had lived long enough to devote the time and attention he gave LoTR to the Silmarillion, it would have been a stunning book, and much more accesible.
I don't think Tolkien's style was the reason for the succes of the Hobbit and LoTR since they're both quite different in style. I'm going for substance all the way.
__________________
We are not things. |
01-02-2005, 02:40 PM | #9 | |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
Quote:
Ahhh! Wouldn't that have been nice! Yes, the Sil is 2 dimensional...it had no depth. It would have been wonderful with more time and detail, and "storytelling".
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! Last edited by Lizra : 01-02-2005 at 02:41 PM. |
|
01-02-2005, 05:10 PM | #10 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 6,975
|
The Sil is the best. Must better than LotR in my opinion - although, I'm not sure if it's only the content or the style too. I didn't mind the style at all, I think it's part of what the Silmarillion is supposed to be - some kind of history book of the elves.
(It's not dry! ) |
01-02-2005, 05:24 PM | #11 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
It's not his fault the style in the Sil is... how it is. He didn't finish the manuscript, and as you all know, his son had to edit it. Of course Christopher couldn't know what to edit. An editor working with the original author and/or the author would have tidied it up nicely.
I think style and substance are deeply intertwined in any book. As for LOTR, it's ultimately about the substance for me. However, I love the style, and it's partly due to style that I re-read the series. And re-re read.....
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-02-2005, 06:07 PM | #12 | |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
The Silmarillion isn't even JRR. It's CJR. So you can't base anything on that.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
|
01-02-2005, 06:15 PM | #13 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Sure the Sil is JRR! He wrote the content. CJR put it together and did some editing. Admirable work, but that doesn't make him the author. Either way, I prefer the style of LOTR to the Sil. But that's another thread maybe.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
01-02-2005, 06:22 PM | #14 |
Fëanorophobic
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the pages of a book
Posts: 1,417
|
I don't find a difference between the Sil. and Lotr in terms of style. The ordinari-ness is the same. But when we get to the good parts, I find the Sil. has much more (and much better) good parts than Lotr.
Wayfarer, the Sil. is definitely JRRT's work! |
01-03-2005, 09:16 AM | #15 |
Fëanorophobic
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the pages of a book
Posts: 1,417
|
Ok, another way to look at it:
Do you think that the same Tolkien stories would attract a wider audience if they were written by a different author? Would you have reacted differently to such stories and probably not have become fans? |
01-03-2005, 11:37 AM | #16 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Tolkien's style is that of an older story-telling format: a combination of the Icelandic saga, medieval romance, and history. It is an inherent part of the work and distinguishes it from imitators. It grew out of the love of languages and their context. So it IS uniquely and irreplicably JRRT. Note the confirmation on this forum of 1)the Tolkien rip-off thread and 2)the enormous number of analytical threads dissecting the multiple components.
His imitator have borrowed ideas but NONE have duplicated the effects because style and substance are so intertwined. As to substance, the complexity of the inherent philosophical and Christian (the Roman Catholic worldview of Tolkien) basis as understood in the unique person of JRRT and as expressed by him will never be duplicated precisely because the are the soul of the man in the work! Ahh, the glory of the individual redeemed and through his person redeeming the work he loves! Those fractured beams of Eternity through the prism that is JRRT just makes one rejoice and say, Gloria patri et filii et spiritus sanctus, eh?
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-03-2005, 11:40 AM | #17 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4
|
I just find it astonishing that Tolkien can create a whole Mythology, I guess why it appeals to me so much is party because it's an escape from the real world, and Tolkien was just a great story teller!
|
01-03-2005, 02:59 PM | #18 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I dwell in possibility.
Posts: 247
|
Quote:
BTW: 100th post. Yay.
__________________
"...then how shall I Revive the dying tones of minstrelsy, Which linger yet about lone gothic arches, In dark green ivy, and among wild larches?" Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum. |
|
01-03-2005, 03:28 PM | #19 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
i'd say substance... as pointed out by others, the "whole world" approach to his story is what made it incredible
stylistically, i wouldn't call jrrt one of the best... but his ability to change his "voice" according to the material is pretty impressive... lost tales is even more in the early-mythological style than the silmarillion, while the hobbit is very much geared towards the younger reader in some ways i think the lotr suffers a bit in style because he was trying to write a out of his realm of expertise... to make it more of a "popular novel" after his failure to get earlier works published he may have simplified things more than he needed to... much like what he did to the lost tales when reworking them for the silmarillion
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
01-03-2005, 05:58 PM | #20 |
The Supreme Lord of The Northern Eagles
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: trondheim, norway
Posts: 1,388
|
as many others have said, substance is the thing! the style in Hobbit and LoTR isn't that bad, quite good actualy, but it is the substance that takes it of this earth and onto a wholy new level.
in Sil, the style don't work out very well, but the substance is really amazing! but substance, definitive...
__________________
Don't Panic! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Research paper on Tolkien | The Telcontarion | Writer's Workshop | 10 | 12-16-2007 12:04 PM |
Whats on your Bookshelf? | hectorberlioz | General Literature | 135 | 02-12-2007 07:26 PM |
My 10Kth post - Tolkien and a California Girl | Rían | General Messages | 52 | 11-12-2005 10:38 PM |
Your intials Tolkien style acronyms | afro-elf | Middle Earth | 128 | 06-24-2002 08:38 PM |
a little orientation needed | DrFledermaus | The Silmarillion | 9 | 02-12-2001 05:48 AM |