12-01-2005, 03:48 PM | #161 |
Hobbit in the Music
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Westmarch
Posts: 1,111
|
You can't "leave science alone" because science never stops! There are always more discoveries to make. Like the discovery of the atom and quantum theory. If we never questioned what "established science" believes, we'd never find out where it's wrong!
|
12-01-2005, 04:12 PM | #162 |
Entmoot Attorney-General,
Equilibrating the Scales of Justice, Administrator ♎ Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,891
|
Exactly!
However, people should leave the definition of science alone, that is refrain from trying to incorporate the supernatural in science. Science is a way of describing the natural world using natural methods.
__________________
An unwritten post is a delightful universe of infinite possibilities. Set down one word, however, and it immediately becomes earthbound. Set down one sentence and it’s halfway to being just like every other bloody entry that’s ever been written. ☻ |
12-01-2005, 05:46 PM | #163 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Couldn't agree more about the supernatural, but what about the political?
e.g. the climate change denial industry: doing "science" in order to support a political position. Or, on the other side of the political fence, spinning the facts to make nuclear look scary. |
12-01-2005, 06:12 PM | #164 | |
Entmoot Attorney-General,
Equilibrating the Scales of Justice, Administrator ♎ Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,891
|
Quote:
One should ask oneself where the money for the research came from I suppose. Many universities around the world have strict regulations that prevents them from accepting funds from companies, in order to make their research as unbiased as possible.
__________________
An unwritten post is a delightful universe of infinite possibilities. Set down one word, however, and it immediately becomes earthbound. Set down one sentence and it’s halfway to being just like every other bloody entry that’s ever been written. ☻ Last edited by Jonathan : 12-01-2005 at 06:14 PM. |
|
12-01-2005, 10:28 PM | #165 | |
Entmoot Secretary of the Treasury
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Campsite-by-Giraffe
Posts: 5,408
|
Quote:
__________________
KI6PFA Amateur Radio Operator
|
|
12-01-2005, 11:13 PM | #166 |
Hobbit in the Music
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Westmarch
Posts: 1,111
|
I don't think science has to be limited to what we can see with our eyes, measure with tools, and record on a data sheet. For me, religion is a science. I don't just believe what anyone tells me; I experiment by acting on what God tells me (whether through direct prompting by feeling and thought, or by the words of a spiritual leader), and find out for myself if it's true. I think this fits comfortably with the "definition of science".
Science (from the American Heritage Dictionary): 1. The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena. 2. Such activities restricted to explaining a limitied class of natural phenomena. 3. Such activities applied to an object of inquiry or study. 4. Knowledge, especially that gained through experience. The scientific method has been applied to many different areas of life, including decision making, problem solving, personal relationships, creativity in advertising, and business. Why not religion? So many people believe that reason and faith are opposite ends of one spectrum, but the truth is that reason and unreasonableness are one axis, while faith and unbelief are another. You can be both disbelieving and unreasonable, just as you can have both faith and reason in abundance. You can also be strong in one but lacking in another. Science and religion are not enemies; questioning the generally accepted theory of evolution, for example, is not "attacking science". It's simply considering other possibilities, just as the theories of two different scientists don't always agree. Who knows? Maybe someday physicists will discover with their microscopes and spectroscopes what I believe to be true through scripture and prayer: that spirit is matter and light is intelligence. Anyway, that's my rant for today. I go to a religious university, and we bring religion into every subject, so it doesn't seem like a big deal to cross the lines that are considered politically correct (that religion and science don't mix). |
12-01-2005, 11:29 PM | #167 | |
Entmoot Secretary of the Treasury
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Campsite-by-Giraffe
Posts: 5,408
|
Quote:
__________________
KI6PFA Amateur Radio Operator
|
|
01-06-2006, 04:38 PM | #168 | |
Master of Orchestration President Emeritus of Entmoot 2004-2008
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lost in the Opera House
Posts: 9,328
|
Quote:
Of course what you're talking about is Natural Science.
__________________
ACALEWIA- President of Entmoot hectorberlioz- Vice President of Entmoot Acaly und Hektor fur Presidants fur EntMut fur life! Join the discussion at Entmoot Election 2010. "Stupidissimo!"~Toscanini The Da CINDY Code The Epic Poem Of The Balrog of Entmoot: Here ~NEW! ~ Thinking of summer vacation? AboutNewJersey.com - NJ Travel & Tourism Guide |
|
01-06-2006, 04:38 PM | #169 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I am living in a large city with smog!!!!!!
Posts: 27
|
Evolution vs. Religion?
"Are geology and aerology the same, only from different planets?"
Very entertaining trolls' bane. Aerology is the meterology of the vertical extent of the atmosphere. Unfortunately, geology hasn't given me a lot, if any, of background in that area Now I would like to pose a question to all of you science fans: Why do so many people view religion and evolution as exclusive? And why does the earth have to be 6,000 years :± 2,000 in order for there to be a higher power? Is there not a possibility that the earth IS 4.567 billion years old and that there is a creator who allowed the things that he created to adapt to their changing environments. In my experience, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle of extremist viewpoints. I am a little puzzled on people's perspectives on this area of the natural sciences in general. Tell me what you think, I would love to see diverse responses and perhaps that will shed some light on my confusion!
__________________
always trying to learn something- aya Last edited by ayarella : 01-06-2006 at 06:57 PM. |
01-06-2006, 04:43 PM | #170 |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Theres only a few genuine young earthers here. Most of the rest of the creationist fringe just have a thing against evolution for some apparent reason. I agree with you that it certainly does not negate the concept of christianity or religion in general. But many of these folks are being taught that the concept of evolution is somehow an atheist concept only and therefore anti christian.
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
01-06-2006, 05:40 PM | #171 | |
"The Bomb"
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: all over the place
Posts: 1,601
|
Quote:
Again, my opinion. I'm a fan of psychology.
__________________
Could it be that one path to enlightenment leads through insanity? Last edited by Bombadillo : 01-06-2006 at 05:42 PM. |
|
01-06-2006, 05:45 PM | #172 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
01-10-2006, 06:36 PM | #173 | |
Hobbit in the Music
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Westmarch
Posts: 1,111
|
Quote:
Many people hold to this because they believe the Bible to be the ultimate authority (for some it is the only proof of God's existence), and simply say that scientists are wrong about the whole idea of evolution (it is called the THEORY of evolution, and new discoveries are being made constantly to revise it). Let's face it, popular science changes its mind a lot. But truth is absolute, and won't change no matter what the current theory is. When Charles Darwin wrote his book the Origin of Man, there was a huge uproar. I don't think you people realize what a big deal it was for Christians, Jews, Muslims, and other religious groups who had their own Creation stories. The idea that we were simply descended from lower forms of life by some random process of evolution contradicted beliefs that millions of people had held firmly for years. Over time this theory and others, such as the scientifically calculated age of the earth, have become standard in public school science classes and textbooks, at least in America. I think each person has to decide for him- or herself what to believe and where to find the balance between religious and scientific belief. The biblical account can be interpreted in many different ways. For example, you could say that a "day" might possibly mean a longer span of time; thousands or even billions of years. You could say that God merely directed the evolution and guided it in the direction he wanted. And what about the time Adam and Eve were IN the Garden of Eden? We don't know how long that lasted. I personally believe that some forms of "evolution" do happen, but not that humans are descended from lower forms of life. I believe in God, and that we are his children, created in his image. Darwin's observations of the change in shape of certain birds' beaks is certainly well documented, but humans have been breeding animals for different traits for years, so this isn't truly earth-shattering. Natural selection is simply how animals breed themselves in order to fulfill God's commandment to multiply and replenish the earth. God wants his creations to stay alive, so he gave them the means to adapt. I don't completely trust carbon dating, because the process hasn't been in use for even a hundred years, let alone a billion. What if carbon decay isn't a completely steady process, or something else has affected it over the centuries? That said, I am not completely certain how long creation actually took before Adam and Eve left the Garden, but I believe that the Biblical account of man's history since that time is true. I do think "day" could be a symbolic word-- not a specific amount of time, but a task or job to be done. I have a firm belief in the laws of physics, which state that matter cannot be created or destroyed, only rearranged or (in very unusual circumstances) converted into energy. So I don't believe in an ex-nihilo creation, but that God created (a better word is organized) the earth and its inhabitants from existing material. God created the whole universe, so the earth may have been used before in his earlier creations, and perhaps this is why there are dinosaur bones and so on. Another principle of physics is entropy, which says (to summarize) that everything will naturally go from order to disorder. Doesn't that contradict evolution (organisms becoming more complex and ordered over time) to some degree? I believe that no "evolution" would be possible without the hand and mind (power and intelligence) of God directing it. Life does not occur randomly, and nor does intelligence. Do scientists have any reason at all for evolution to have "naturally" produced intelligent two-legged soft skinned beings with no tail or natural weapons? It makes no sense. I've seen the cave paintings in France that were supposedly (according to the visitor's center) drawn by pre-human ape-like creatures. They're beautiful, and I seriously doubt that anyone less intelligent that us could have drawn them. For me, the important thing is not if or how or when God created the earth, but that he loves me. That, I have proven for myself. There are countless things we don't know about this universe, and we can't even begin to comprehend the scope of God's wisdom and power, so some questions have to remain unanswered for now. But he has promised that one day we can know all that he knows, so I trust in that. |
|
02-17-2006, 11:57 AM | #174 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
DNA ... validation and invalidations ... who'd have thunk it?
http://titusonenine.classicalanglica...11447#comments
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
02-17-2006, 12:44 PM | #175 |
The Intermittent One
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: here and there
Posts: 4,671
|
i love science
i have grade A in GCSE Physics, Chemistry and Biology, am currently studying A2 Archaeology, after getting grade A in my AS Archaeology, and will be studying for either a BA in Archaeology and Anthropology or an MA in Scottish Archaeology from october |
02-17-2006, 02:33 PM | #176 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
02-17-2006, 09:18 PM | #177 |
Entmoot Secretary of the Treasury
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Campsite-by-Giraffe
Posts: 5,408
|
Quantum mechanics. Does anyone know anything about quantum mechanics? I do! But I'll wait till someone else says something before scaring everyone away. I fell like Alia from Dune.
__________________
KI6PFA Amateur Radio Operator
|
02-17-2006, 09:59 PM | #178 |
Elven Maiden
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,309
|
I don`t really know much about quantum mechanics but the little that I do know makes me wanna know more, so please, scare me all you want! onegaishimaaasu.
|
02-17-2006, 10:06 PM | #179 | |
Entmoot Secretary of the Treasury
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Campsite-by-Giraffe
Posts: 5,408
|
Quote:
I've got a lot mroe to say besides quantum mechanics, but perhaps some is best said in my old astronomy thread.
__________________
KI6PFA Amateur Radio Operator
|
|
02-17-2006, 10:26 PM | #180 |
Elven Maiden
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,309
|
"quantum froth" huh. Never heard of that. But I do have a hard time trying to get my head around the concept of infinite mass. Wait, suddenly I forgot what an event horizon is. Wasn`t it something to do with the trapped light? How about the thing about the two slit experiement and electrons being in two places at once- is that related to quantum physics? I remember reading an article about it, how small things can be in two places at once (even as big as a small dust particle???). I haven`t thought about this stuff for a long time. Really crazy though. Hard to imagine. Extra dimensions are hard to imagine.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paradise Lost | Brill | General Literature | 106 | 01-10-2014 08:13 PM |
GOOD new/recent Science Fiction/Fantasy? | bropous | Fantasy and Sci-Fi Novels | 4 | 03-12-2007 01:36 PM |
Why you believe what you believe I | Rían | General Messages | 1173 | 02-01-2005 03:56 PM |
Science Museum. | Arian | General Messages | 13 | 03-01-2002 11:13 PM |
Science Fiction Books Worth Reading | Quazar | Fantasy and Sci-Fi Novels | 2 | 12-18-2001 11:42 AM |