03-19-2002, 10:24 PM | #141 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Right... Now that I'm, off topic, what, exactly, is Absoulteism?
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
03-19-2002, 11:27 PM | #142 |
Halfwitted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eryn Vorn
Posts: 1,659
|
What? Now I'm entirely confused. The very same arguments I already made can be used to refute the points you just made, Wayfarer. We're going around in circles here, and you keep misreading and misinterpreting what I say. We're obviously on an entirely different page.
I didn't say rape was bad, I said it was unpleasant for the majority of people in the world, which is why we consider it bad. I'm not assuming that individuals naturally care about the species either. Most of what we believe is taught - that's why we care about this stuff. As for your second point, I don't see what it has to do with the subject. How does that argument prove absolutism? If you gave up all morality right now - so? That doesn't prove or disprove either absolutism or relativism. Point #3 - Not given a reason? That whole quote was a reason. And if you let some one else sacrifice themselves for you and don't ever do the same for some one else, again - so? That still doesn't prove or disprove absolutism or relativism! Point #4 - You've supported your case no better than I have mine, only explained why you're an absolutist with various moral scenarios. The pot's calling the kettle black. Morality is substantially different from gravity. Gravity exists without humans; morality doesn't. Not an apt analogy. The nutrition one's good though. Are you saying that I should give up being vegetarian and strive to eat like everyone else because that's the best way? I assure, I'm healthier than a good many traditional eaters. Different ways do work. Besides (and this is the important part), you overlook the fact that we are born with nutritional requirements, while we are not born with morals. Babies are amoral. They learn moral values from their parents. We don't learn nutritional requirements - they already exist, we just learn what they are. Morals are not a physical part of our make-up. If a person lived completely alone, they wouldn't need morals because they'd never interact with other people. However, they would still need nutrition. Nutritional needs are biological, unlike morals.
__________________
Fingolfin lives! ... in my finger! The Crossroads of Arda - Warning. Halfwit content. Not appropriate for people with IQ of over 18. The Fellowship of the Message Board Nyáréonié - The Tale of Tears Last edited by FrodoFriend : 03-19-2002 at 11:29 PM. |
03-19-2002, 11:56 PM | #143 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
But it could be argued, FrodoFriend, that morals are biologically needed. Without morals, we might end up destroying our species! I'm just kidding. I get your point. I'd try to join in, but I can't think of anything intelligent to say at the moment.
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
03-20-2002, 12:01 AM | #144 |
Halfwitted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eryn Vorn
Posts: 1,659
|
Whew, you scared me there. I was afraid I'd have two people to argue against!
__________________
Fingolfin lives! ... in my finger! The Crossroads of Arda - Warning. Halfwit content. Not appropriate for people with IQ of over 18. The Fellowship of the Message Board Nyáréonié - The Tale of Tears |
03-20-2002, 12:05 AM | #145 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
Oh, you might, FF! As soon as I get my brain running again. . .*winds up the key at the back of my neck* okay, now I'm back in business!
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
03-20-2002, 12:32 AM | #146 | |
Hoplite Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,931
|
Wayfarer,
Quote:
If you are an absolutist killing is wrong. Period. Biology DOES play a role in morality. check out the disciplines bio-psychology and socio-biology
__________________
About Eowyn, Does anyone know what her alias Dernhelm means? She was kown as dernhelm because of her exclaimation when she realized that the rider's headgear was heavy and obscured her sight. 'Dern Helm" Culled from Entmoot From Kirinski 57 and Wayfarer. Last edited by afro-elf : 03-20-2002 at 12:34 AM. |
|
03-20-2002, 12:42 AM | #147 | |
Halfwitted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eryn Vorn
Posts: 1,659
|
Quote:
My point with that was this: If you don't eat for the a month, your body shuts down and you die. If you don't exercise your morality for a month, your body keeps on working just fine. Morality is not built into your genetic make-up. Biology may influence morality (through chemicals or whatever), but does not create it.
__________________
Fingolfin lives! ... in my finger! The Crossroads of Arda - Warning. Halfwit content. Not appropriate for people with IQ of over 18. The Fellowship of the Message Board Nyáréonié - The Tale of Tears |
|
03-20-2002, 12:54 AM | #148 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
I think I'll go read that book "Peacemaking Among Primates" that I have for school, now. I recall some of the chapters bringing up similiar issues, but I don't remember what it said.
Now I have a question: What was the purpose of my saying that? FF, in a purely biological way, you are right, but only by your example. And that's just fine if you live on a desert island by yourself, but in a society, morals are sort of necessary, or else nothing would work. NOTHING. I'm not sure what my point is. Maybe I should be the elven lord of perpetual confusion. I hope no mods saw that!
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
03-20-2002, 09:35 AM | #149 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bree
Posts: 148
|
would killing Adolf Hitler (or Osam BinLadin) be morally wrong, even if they do not threaten you directly?
|
03-20-2002, 10:42 AM | #150 | ||
Hoplite Nomad
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,931
|
Quote:
but as it applies to this this Quote:
__________________
About Eowyn, Does anyone know what her alias Dernhelm means? She was kown as dernhelm because of her exclaimation when she realized that the rider's headgear was heavy and obscured her sight. 'Dern Helm" Culled from Entmoot From Kirinski 57 and Wayfarer. |
||
03-20-2002, 12:37 PM | #151 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Now that I read the enitre thread I notice that most of you have a slightly different view on just what's absloute and what's relative. Maybe you should clear that out first. Afterall how can you discuss absolutism and relativism if you can't agree on their definition?
__________________
We are not things. |
03-20-2002, 01:42 PM | #152 | |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
Quote:
Eek! I have to run, otherwise I would continue!
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
|
03-20-2002, 04:55 PM | #153 | ||||||
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
Quote:
Morals are taught by humans to protect themselves. Therefore, we shouldn't pay any more attention to morality than is strictly nescessary. Humans are taught to care about other humans because we want to protect ourselves. But we should still pay attention to what we're taught. Then, if you manage to prove that morals don't really matter because they're subjective constructions (and you have not), you must accept the fact that compassion and anything but selfish motivation, those things likewise being subjective constructions taught by humanity, will also cease to matter. You cannot remove the reason behind conventional morality without likewise crippling morality as a whole. I can hold to morality, even when I'd rather not, because I know it's more than me. You can only stick to a truly relativist morality as long as you continue to feel like it. Quote:
You have, with your arguements for relativitism, privided an ample justification for humans to think and do whatever they wish. Certainly, we'll continue to behave morally when we happen to care about others, but that's also a learned behavior, and thus not a very strong motivation. And then, a few posts later, you admit that not only do you want people to be compassionate, you have a certain morality you think they should follow. You're undermining morality with one hand, and trying to keep it intact with the other. You will, invariably, fail. Quote:
Sure, I'd be willing to let someone sacrifice themself, with no intention to repay. By that token, I'm really not going to jump at the chance to sacrifice myself for anyone who hasn't done something for me. Quote:
If you could pre-empt your morality for a month, you would likely be a socio-psychotic, in perfect physical health. Your social, mental, emotional, and spiritual health would likely all suffer. Quote:
In fact, I can be an absolutist, and believe two different things about two different situations. Just like a can have two different opinions of two differnt books. I absolutely despise robert jordan, but that doesn't mean I have to hate all books, or even all fantasy, on the contrary, I love most fantasy. Perhaps this would be a better example. If I go out looking for someone, find them and kill them I can be convicted of murder 1 and face the death penalty. If I accidentally do somehting that results in death, I'm facing involuntary manslaughter and a much lighter sentance. This is just because they're two different crimes. On the contrary, If you and I were to both commit murder, but I caught the death sentance and you got off with a slap on the wrist because of our races, that would be completely bogus. Get what I'm saying?
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned Last edited by Wayfarer : 03-20-2002 at 04:56 PM. |
||||||
03-20-2002, 05:11 PM | #154 | |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
__________________
We are not things. Last edited by Earniel : 03-20-2002 at 05:27 PM. |
|
03-20-2002, 05:33 PM | #155 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
You can't knock a wizard senseless! Everybody knows that!
*/staffbaps Earmiel.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
03-20-2002, 05:43 PM | #156 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Excuse me!?! Did you just staffbapped me?! If you want to staffbap me, at least write my name correct, it stand so sloppy.
*Turns to her black feline minion, Jinx! Bite him! Watches happily as Wayfarer flies screaming in fear from the mini-balrog-cat* Since when are you a wizard anyway?
__________________
We are not things. |
03-20-2002, 09:19 PM | #157 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
*staffbaps Wayfarer* So what if my staff isn't magic? It still works for bapping, oh Wizard!
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
03-21-2002, 12:04 AM | #158 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 479
|
Quote:
People tend to frame what is considered moral and immoral according to their own social conventions and context. That does not mean that morals do not exist and that they are not real. They are very real, but they do have a tendency to mutate over time. This, to me, suggests that there is an element of relativism. But they are still morals even so. |
|
03-22-2002, 11:07 PM | #159 | ||
Halfwitted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eryn Vorn
Posts: 1,659
|
Quote:
Quote:
How about an analogy? Love : Morals Human love evolved from breeding instincts and chemicals in the brain. These things still play a factor in some ways, such as when people are attracted to each other at first sight. However, due to our intellectual capacity, we have augmented love mentally and spiritually. Love is not absolute. No one says you have to love, even though pretty much everyone does. Not everyone loves in the same way. No one kind of love is more factually correct than another. Same with morals. They evolved from instincts, which still factor today, though unconsciously so. They were/are augmented by our increased intellectual capacity into abstract ideas that play a huge part in our lives. No authority says you have to have morals, though nearly everyone does. No one's morals are exactly the same. One kind of moral belief is not more factually correct than another. Do I want to get rid of love? No!! Do I want to get rid of morals? No!! I am a very moral person, at least as much as you are. I have very strong beliefs. I am simply arguing that morals are not absolute. That is all; I am not passing judgment on morals. And it's absolutism that factually doesn't work. If you believe in absolutism, you have to define the absolute and explain where it came from. Relativism is explained by opinions and evolution, both of which we know exist. I am NOT saying that morals don't exist (obviously they do, since we all have them) or that we shouldn't have them, merely that THEY ARE RELATIVE. Do you understand what I've been saying NOW?
__________________
Fingolfin lives! ... in my finger! The Crossroads of Arda - Warning. Halfwit content. Not appropriate for people with IQ of over 18. The Fellowship of the Message Board Nyáréonié - The Tale of Tears Last edited by FrodoFriend : 03-22-2002 at 11:08 PM. |
||
03-23-2002, 12:29 AM | #160 |
Halfwitted
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Eryn Vorn
Posts: 1,659
|
Anyway, there's my POV. It's perfectly logical if you try to understand it. Since I'm tired of this debate now (we're basically just repeating ourselves, no new ground covered), that's my last word. Nice debating with you all!
P.S. This is my thousandth post!
__________________
Fingolfin lives! ... in my finger! The Crossroads of Arda - Warning. Halfwit content. Not appropriate for people with IQ of over 18. The Fellowship of the Message Board Nyáréonié - The Tale of Tears |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'm writing an essay on relativism in LOTR | IronParrot | Lord of the Rings Books | 152 | 02-11-2005 05:38 PM |