02-23-2003, 04:04 AM | #1001 | |
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Quote:
You can't compare the fact the we have troops still in Germany and Japan as a reconstruction force. They're only there as strategic forces and have been for years. Supposedly we will be removing our 70,000 troops from Germany in the near future. It's about time too. No sense in keeping them there, supporting an economy where they're not wanted and since the Soviet Union no longer exists - we don't need to waste money protecting Germany anymore. Just hope without our military presence they don't get any ideas of WWII grandeur again and decide they want to rule the world.
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide Last edited by jerseydevil : 02-23-2003 at 04:05 AM. |
|
02-23-2003, 04:13 AM | #1002 |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Iraq will be strategic until the oil runs out or we switch to a new fuel source or the ME is completely pacified. None of the things will happen in the next ten years. It will be similar to waiting for the USSR to fold.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
02-23-2003, 04:15 AM | #1003 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
Quote:
|
|
02-23-2003, 05:25 AM | #1004 | |
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
OMG! It is not about oil for the zillionth time!!!!
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen |
|
02-23-2003, 12:48 PM | #1005 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right here in between yesterday and tomorrow.
Posts: 357
|
Quote:
One woman did answer his question, unfortunately: "Because we didn't have such a bastard for president then." Then there was the group of three women that shouted him down. Scary. But to balance them, there is this guy himself, going out there and posing the question. You could see he got some of them thinking seriously...maybe for the first time. I also like the point he made at the end -- that most of these were people he'd be glad to call friends, but that the extremist language, name-calling, etc., really hurt their cause. It's like that link here a few pages back to the comical "Weapons of Mass Destruction Not Found" page -- I enjoyed it, too, but wouldn't pass it along because of the gratuitous things about President Bush, in particular, and Mr. Rumsfeld. Dumb stuff. Spoiled the whole thing. BTW, UPI was reporting yesterday that the Chronicle's count of the number of protestors in San Francisco was way below that of the march organizers and the police -- more like 65,000 than 200,000. Both organizers and police disagreed, but both protestors and police had vested interests, the former to show their ability to call up huge numbers of people and the latter to show their ability to handle huge numbers of people relatively peacefully. I tend to believe the Chronicle, at least until I can figure out if they've got a vested interest in it.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
02-23-2003, 01:13 PM | #1006 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Halkirk
Posts: 208
|
I don't want the war in Iraq because in Iraq the people are still sufring from the last war and because if Donreay gets bomded I'll be died.
__________________
Ni melme legolas |
02-23-2003, 01:26 PM | #1007 | ||
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are you living by Donreay Scottland? If so - how do you think he'll attack you there? or even why? I'm assuming it's because of the Nuclear Power Plant. At first I was thinking you were from Israel or another neigboring country, where your fear would be more understandable.
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide Last edited by jerseydevil : 02-23-2003 at 01:36 PM. |
||
02-23-2003, 01:47 PM | #1008 | |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Quote:
It may not be only about oil, but you'd have to be pretty naive to think it doesn't play an important roll. Strategic interests, baby! Even when the administration talks about rebuilding, they mention using oiil revenue to finance it. It's part of the plan. Iraq threatens the oil producing nations of the ME. If there were no oil we wouldn't be talking about this. If Saddam were Idi Amin, slaughtering his people, but had no oil, do you really think we would bother? Think Namibia, Cambodia, Angola, Sudan, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe, China, Tibet, N. Korea. If there were no oil, and it was only a matter of terrorism, then why not just invade as we did in Afganistan? Oil. The fact that the are large assets in the country makes the situation more complicated. Like it or not, the Iraq situation has always been about the oil. We meddled in Iran until the revolution soured it. We supplied arms to both sides in the Iran-Iraq war, hoping to maintain a standoff, preventing a single power from controlling the oil supply, and punishing the Islamic revolutionaries in Iran. We defended Kuwait because of the oil. George H. W. Bush didn't bother to deny that was ther reason for the first Gulf war. His son is just putting a better political spin on his reasoning. Terrorism does tip the scales. Not everything has changed since 9/11, however. The Middle East is a disaster because of the politics of oil over the last 100 years.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
|
02-23-2003, 03:35 PM | #1009 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
Cirdan, all of those arguments have already been answered. We could have taken the oil during the Gulf War, we could have lobbied to lift the sanctions on Iraq so that we could continue trading. In the face of all history and all evidence to the contrary, your thinking that oil is a major factor in this is naive.
Quote:
We also didn't in the past have a strong enough president to lead us against countries that were becoming a threat to world peace. Ronald Reagan led us against Communism and rallies went up all over the place against him, but he helped to protect the world from a dangerous threat. Only President Bush since then has taken similar steps against evil, and just like Ronald Reagan, he's getting pounded for it. |
|
02-23-2003, 03:45 PM | #1010 |
'Sober' Mullet Frosh
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Queen's
Posts: 1,245
|
Was Ronald Reagan so undiplomatic? I would't know it was before my time, but Bush and his administration are abrasive, even if they are right. Explains why him and Ariel SHaron get along so well. The IDF was never good at PR either.
__________________
"Earnur was a man like his father in valour, but not in wisdom" |
02-23-2003, 03:53 PM | #1011 | |
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Quote:
Similar to Bush - Reagan said how it was and what he was going to do. Very few Europeans liked his tough talk. Margaret Thatcher was heavily criticised for standing side by side with Reagan. There was a similar feeling of patriotism during the 80's and the similar outpouring of anti-American demonstrations throughout Europe, particularly in Germany - as there is now.
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide Last edited by jerseydevil : 02-23-2003 at 03:59 PM. |
|
02-23-2003, 04:19 PM | #1012 |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
LE, none of those questions have been answered. "Coulda" meeans zip. "Couldn't" would be more appropriate. Certrainly we have the military power to destroy any nation. That does not add up to political power. We "could" have invaded Iran in 1979 but we feared a Soviet counter-invasion from Afganistan.
We "could" have invaded Iraq alone in 1991 except we lacked the political power to go it alone. We could have saved the Kurds from the post-war retalliations of Saddam for working overtly with coalition forces but we weren't that concerned for thier welfare while they we still alive. The Regan administration "could" have decided not to give Saddam's regime $10 billion in military aid including chemical and biological weapons. The idea that one must invade weak nations and tolerate stronger ones regardless of the threat they pose is morally bankrupt. War should be the last resort, not just a matter of convenience. Finally LE, your tactic of brushing aside arguements by saying they have been answered is pointless and a bit lazy. If you have nothing to say about them, that is what you should say, nothing. It turns debate into contradiction. There would never have been US invovlement in Iraq had oil not been a strategic concern. Reagan was very diplomatic through administrative channels. The SALT agreements are a good example. While he threatened a good deal, he was genuinely negotiating for peace from a position of strength. The "Evil Empire" but was pretty funny since we were allying ourselves with the pretty evil empire of China at the time. Evil Empire Lite. The current administration would be disappointed with a peaceful solution, if it meant leaving Saddam in place. A moot point since war and/or death are the only thing that will remove him from power and resolve the current problems. Did anyone notice that Iran is closer to WMD that Iraq at this point? Did anyone see SNL last nigt? LOL! The "Hardball" parody with the French diplomat was too funny.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
02-23-2003, 05:08 PM | #1013 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
Quote:
As for it being morally bankrupt to ignore bigger countries while dealing with little ones, I think that it sometimes only makes sense. If a bad situation has fully developed, like North Korea or China, we can't just barrel in there anymore. A solution that would work with the developing situation isn't the same solution that will work for the fully developed situation. A different way of dealing with the problem is called for. Meanwhile, if there is a smaller country that is (A bad solution developing) that is turning into one of the big solutions but is not yet too big for you to deal with, then it is your perogative to go and deal with it before it as well becomes out of hand. It's simple logic, not moral bankruptcy. Certainly we wish that China and North Korea weren't the problems they are now, and we still should do something about it. But we cannot go to war with either without huge risk to ourselves, and that cost must be taken into account. Besides, China isn't threatening us. Quote:
As for your refutation of the 'coulda', I want to point out that although you're right about some of the things that in the past we could have done, you're also right that there were always reasons for our not doing those things. Those evidences you quoted don't equal anything, all they do is describe things we could have done but it was too risky or the costs made it not worth it. This is another issue that I've described, two points in time where we could have taken the oil (As you've claimed it is our motive to take). We obviously didn't do it, and I'm giving the reason why we didn't do it. That's the obvious reason, that even though we could have taken it, we didn't, because it wasn't what we were after. You as yet have not offered an alternative reason as for why we didn't take it that is reasonable. |
||
02-23-2003, 05:18 PM | #1014 |
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Well my personal feeling is that we need to deal with the smaller countries while they ARE small - instead opf waiting for them to blow up like they do when they develop into a North Korea.
I agree that oil plays a role in the Middle East - of course it does. There is also no problem with dealing with situations that are in a nation's self interest before dealing with others. Others may have a problem - but I elect our leaders to look after America - not after Europe or other countries. I want OUR leaders working for us - not foreign interests. We've done the appeasement thing, the negotiation thing, the isolation thing, history shows that this does not really work. It just postpones the inevitable to the point where it is much more difficult to deal with.
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide Last edited by jerseydevil : 02-23-2003 at 05:19 PM. |
02-23-2003, 05:58 PM | #1015 | ||
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Quote:
I agree, JD, these interests should be protected. I just want to call a spade a spade. "Evil" alone is not a prime motivator in US foriegn policy. Actually the isolation, negotiation thing works with patience (see USSR, China, Cuba). To say negotiation only works when military options are less optimistic is intellectually dishonest. It's pragmatic only if the benefits outweigh the costs. The US has forced the stakes high with the mobilzation of it's forces. It basically can't "fold" now without losing authority. We must show our will to follow through now. Unless we help resolve the Palestinian issue we are treating the symptom and not the disease. Quote:
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
||
02-23-2003, 06:26 PM | #1016 | ||||
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Quote:
There is another problem now though and that is the militant terrorists which come out of that region. In this case - even if there was no oil - it would be in American's best interest to get inolved to put an end to this. Many "have nots" blame the "haves" for all their problems and feel like they deserve something. This breeds resentment. Unless we can improve the conditions of the Middle Eastern people - we will always have terrorism. We need to get these governments to change and I think that Afganistan and Iraq are good places to start. My main concern is not the result of the war - but just making sure that we don't isolate the iraqi people and that we truly work to establish a democracy in Iraq. Not a puppet government or one that does not represent the people. We can successfully execute the war - and I think it is necessary - but we must do the post war properly and not half-way. Quote:
No matter what the PC thing to say is - this is a war against the Middle East extremists. Iraq is just the first phase of this. The rest may not be militarily - but we do need to take an active role and not just passively hope that the Middle East will come into the 21st Century and change. People should be outraged that Middle Eastern schools teach hatred - including Saudi Arabia. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide Last edited by jerseydevil : 02-23-2003 at 06:31 PM. |
||||
02-23-2003, 10:32 PM | #1017 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
Quote:
When the Jewish state was first established, there were many, many Palestinians in Israel. Because of that, the Jewish leaders were aware that if they were going to have the majority in their democracy, they knew that they had to expel many of the Palestinians that were currently living there. The war waged between the Arabs and the Israelites gave them a good excuse. Many Palestinians were exported from their homes and from their lands during that time. Many eyewitness accounts and other evidences exist of this from the Palestinian side, but the Israelies claim that these expulsions never happened. It is true that some Palestinians were terrified into fleeing because of the reports given by the Arab army, in the hopes that it would raise up support for them. The Palestinians rather than becoming furious and attacking the Israelies, fled in terror. Also Jewish terrorists assisted others that wouldn't make this move. Some land was bought as well, but not much. Most of the people were expelled. As I said, the Israelites deny that these expulsions ever happened, but those claims seem rather dubious due to the fact that the UN said that the Palestinians could return to their homes, but Israel never allowed it. The logic of this move of expelling the Palestinians and the evidence for such a move is strong. America's support of the Sharon government causes us to be villified in the Middle East. Many European and nonEuropean countries can see the justice of their claims; America is Israel's prime supporter. Now we see the more recent side of this. Israel has in the past taken land and expelled Palestinians without permitting them to return, so it's logical that we'd see the same strategy in place today. And I wasn't surprised. Rather than accepting Bush's overtures of peace, Israel has taken an extremely tough stance against the Palestinians, not willing to yield an inch until the Palestinians yield (Something that at this point seems very unlikely to happen, particularly as the Muslim nations see them as unjustly treated and support them). Notice Israel's behavior when it entered into Palestinian territory. They were targeting the 'terrorist infrastructure'. The only possibility of this being true is if the whole economy was supporting and building up terror, something that seems unlikely to be true. In entering these territories, the Israelite army destroyed huge amounts of infrastructure and targetted the economy. Video tapes were taken of what was destroyed- electrical facilities, education materials and other things that plainly had nothing to do with terrorism but which millions of dollars were spent on by the UN and by America for the building up of the Palestinian economy. They targeted specifically and destroyed that which was giving the Palestinians hope in the land they occupied. It is in keeping with their overall strategy of taking land and expelling the Palestinians from what they want. They also have much greater media coverage of their problems, like the suicide bombers, then the Palestinians do of all the things that have happened to them. I realize that Israel has a lot of good and compassion in it as well; I've been painting it in a rather bad light here. But I think that there are two sides to the story and that the Israelite government's tactics have caused much of the terrorism from which they now suffer. |
|
02-23-2003, 10:47 PM | #1018 | |
I am Freddie/UNDERCOVER/ Founder of The Great Continent of Entmoot
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
Posts: 9,431
|
Quote:
After the Passover massacre and the Bar Mitzvah attack - Israelis have a right to defend themselves. I was hoping for peace before - but now I feel that israel needs to take action. Whenever anything would calm down - israel would pull back their troops - and as soon as they did that - there would be another suicide bombing. Until the suicide bombings stop against innocent civilians - I will not support the palestinians. They must stop the bombings.
__________________
Come back! Come back! To Mordor we will take you! "The only thing better than a great plan is implementing a great plan" - JerseyDevil "If everyone agreed with me all the time, everything would be just fine"- JerseyDevil AboutNewJersey.com New Jersey MessageBoard Another Tolkien Forum Memorial to the Twin Towers New Jersey Map Fellowship of the Messageboard Legend of the Jersey Devil Support New Jersey's Liberty Tower Peacefire.org AboutNewJersey.com - New Jersey Travel and Tourism Guide |
|
02-24-2003, 12:25 AM | #1019 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
Quote:
But after the Jenin affair was over, the Israelites would not permit human rights organizations or anyone into the whole area for a large amount of time, regardless of the fact that numerous governments and agencies were demanding access. Video tapes were taken by the Palestinians of the bodies being taken out. In any case though, what I was describing to you was history, showing that the Israelites have historically and in the present had a system of taking land for themselves. I'm not claiming that all the fault lies on them, but the situation is easy for violent or right wing Islamic fundamentalists to take advantage of. People like Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and others are easy to find support, and groups like Hamas can gain support in the surroundings that Israel created. Quote:
|
||
02-24-2003, 02:10 AM | #1020 |
the dumb stoner canuck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 2,542
|
a war would suck because if it was nuclear it would affect us all
__________________
-"Down with the system"-Serj tankian of system of a down -“Humans have been on the earth for millions of years, yet we don’t believe man began thinking until he started building walls. And what good have these walls ever done us?”-Serj tankian of soad -"stupid people do stupid things"-Serj tankian of soad "Trying is the first step to failure" Homer Simpson "It isn't going to be easy"-jerseydevil "only the good die young" I AM CANADIAN If the people lead, the leaders will follow. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Iran and Iraq-problems-outlook-discussion | brownjenkins | General Messages | 208 | 05-27-2008 12:45 PM |
The effectiveness of a "War" on terror | Fenir_LacDanan | General Messages | 121 | 02-02-2007 03:29 PM |
Putting Saddam's conviction into perspective | MrBishop | General Messages | 24 | 11-21-2006 04:56 AM |
WMD search officially over in Iraq | Ragnarok | General Messages | 40 | 01-14-2005 04:48 PM |