08-19-2002, 04:24 PM | #81 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,286
|
I certainly believe Eol did love her. First of all, he married her. In those times, marriage without mutual love was unheard of. And, as I said before, she gave him a son, whom he loved and taught. The act of sex implied mutual consent, since rape was also unheard of. If both did not love each other, why else would they both agree?
Quote:
__________________
"For the less even as for the greater there is some deed that he may accomplish but once only; and in that deed his heart shall rest." - Fëanor |
|
08-19-2002, 08:24 PM | #82 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
“Eöl found...the sister of King Turgon astray in the wild near his dwelling, and he took her to wife by force: a very wicked deed in the eyes of the Eldar.” (Quendi and Eldar essay, footnote 9, War of the Jewels, HME)
Looks like Tolkien originally wanted to paint Eol as an evil bastard, but then watered his character down.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
08-19-2002, 10:46 PM | #83 | |
Slacker
Warrior Admin Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,759
|
Now that I reread the story, Eol is worse than I thought. I forgot about the part that when he first saw Aredhel, he enchanted the woods so that she couldn't find her way out. But, she wasn't unhappy with him.
Quote:
__________________
"If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you." Gandalf to Pippin Psalm 107:31 |
|
08-20-2002, 01:23 AM | #84 | |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
Quote:
Thanks for finding that quote, BoP. I was going to say, I think at this point the discussion would turn to the intentions of the author, rather the character of Eol. What did Tolkien intend? Evidently, he originally planned to have Eol as an evil bastard, but changed it somewhere...or did he change it all that much? Why am I attempting to confuse myself?
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
|
08-20-2002, 01:42 AM | #85 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
I don't think the character of Eol from Histories is really relevant here, because, frankly, the source is quite unreliable. Whatever Tolkien intended when he created the aforementioned character is also irrelevant, since he could've and most likely did change his mind before or during the development of Eol from the Silmarillion. Unless there's proof that both characters are one and the same, they should be recognized as individuals.
__________________
"For the less even as for the greater there is some deed that he may accomplish but once only; and in that deed his heart shall rest." - Fëanor |
|
08-20-2002, 01:46 AM | #86 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Well I posted it, because I thought it was interesting to see how his character evolved from that of a blackguard, to one of lesser evil. My point was that the Silmarillion version hardly stands up to the label of evil in comparison to the one Tolkien originally worked with.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
08-20-2002, 01:54 AM | #87 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,286
|
I know, and I agree that it is a valuable insight. My last paragraph was more in response to EG's post, not to question the reasoning behind yours.
__________________
"For the less even as for the greater there is some deed that he may accomplish but once only; and in that deed his heart shall rest." - Fëanor |
08-20-2002, 02:02 AM | #88 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
Keep in mind that Tolkien did not publish The Silmarillion himself. And I think the character of Eol in histories is significant here; the Eol we see in The Silmarillion is based on the one in the Histories, so I would not give Sil. Eol individual status, just slightly different. And mind you, it did not change that much. He still ensnared her and would have married her, whether she was willing or no.
And I doubt Aredhel would have forgotten her home and been satisfied forever, away from the light of the sun, and her kin.
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
08-20-2002, 02:30 AM | #89 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,286
|
I realize that Eol (S) is based on the Eol from the Histories, but that still doesn't mean they're the same person. The Histories was a rough sketch of characters and stories who were later refined or changed to become the ones we are familiar with from LotR and the Silmarillion. For example, Melko and Melkor are very different individuals.
Quote:
Again, I disagree. Aredhel and Eol were very alike in the sense that they both craved freedom. Also, before the birth of Maeglin, neither had any desire to go back to Gondolin or Doriath, respectively (according to the texts). Without the desire to return home, Perhaps Aredhel would eventually become like Eol.
__________________
"For the less even as for the greater there is some deed that he may accomplish but once only; and in that deed his heart shall rest." - Fëanor |
|
08-20-2002, 02:36 AM | #90 |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
It is not until after Eol's actions are described that it says anything about Aredhel not being wholly unwilling (and putting it like that, it doesn't sound like she was particuarly happy either, just not to upset...). What one can assume from the way it is written is that she had little in the way of choice, but she ended up not minding. See, it says (and I don't have the book with me again. arr.) first that Eol ensnared her and brought her to his home, and married her. It says nothing on how she felt about this until the next paragraph. Read it again; I think it implies he would have done so anyway.
Also, I don't think it would be in Aredhel's nature to become completely satisfied with her dark life with Eol, away from the sun and her kin. I think the seeds of discontent were there (and I'll read it again as soon as I find my book so I can be sure) and Maeglin only helped by listening to stories. But I need the book...argh.
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
08-20-2002, 03:01 AM | #91 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Well, all that says, is that Eol was NOT a nice person, and that he had an agenda. It doesn't say that he was an evil [Edited]. Just a twit.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords Last edited by BeardofPants : 08-20-2002 at 03:13 AM. |
08-20-2002, 03:06 AM | #92 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 60,865
|
Dude, you can't say that on Entmoot. It's not in the filter, but I know you can't say that.
__________________
Falmon -- Dylan |
08-20-2002, 03:12 AM | #93 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
What? People have said that before...
Fine, I'll edit.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
08-20-2002, 02:22 PM | #94 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Middle Earth (I wish)
Posts: 670
|
I seriously do not like Eol, or Maeglin for that matter.
__________________
Few know whither their road will take them till they come to its end. -Legolas FRODO LIVES! ABORTION IS HOMICIDE |
08-20-2002, 07:46 PM | #95 |
Slacker
Warrior Admin Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,759
|
Care to elaborate?
__________________
"If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you." Gandalf to Pippin Psalm 107:31 |
08-23-2002, 10:02 PM | #96 |
Slacker
Warrior Admin Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,759
|
It seems that Eol is worse than I thought. I thought that maybe he was just lonely. I guess that theory should have gone out the window when he killed his wife, huh? Anyway, I stumbled upon a piece of information that I found that says for a fact that he had a dark heart. But then again, I guess we knew that anyway. Just for the heck of it, here is goes. When Beleg is choosing a blade from the armory of Thingol, he chooses Anglachel, which was forged from a fallen star by Eol. Melian says, "There is malice in this sword. The dark heart of the smith still dwells in it." Just my quick two cents.
__________________
"If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you." Gandalf to Pippin Psalm 107:31 |
08-23-2002, 10:23 PM | #97 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,286
|
A dark heart doesn't necessarily mean evil. For example, Turin certainly had a dark heart, but he still wasn't evil.
Also, just to nitpick, the death of his wife was not intentional. He was aiming at his son.
__________________
"For the less even as for the greater there is some deed that he may accomplish but once only; and in that deed his heart shall rest." - Fëanor |
08-23-2002, 11:07 PM | #98 |
Slacker
Warrior Admin Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,759
|
So he didn't intentionally kill his wife. He was aiming for his son, which is just as bad to me. I bet he didn't really care that he had killed his wife because she had led Maeglin out of Nan Elmoth and gone against his wishes to never leave their home. Anyway, the word 'malice' there signals to me that he was bad.
__________________
"If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you." Gandalf to Pippin Psalm 107:31 |
08-23-2002, 11:11 PM | #99 |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
He was bad. Does that indicate evil? I think disturbed is a better word.
|
08-24-2002, 12:30 AM | #100 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
We already knew that he wasn't exactly angelic. Just because he had a dark heart, does not, an evil dude, make.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |