10-31-2004, 02:57 PM | #61 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
_The Broken Bubble_ is more realist than either fantasy or science fiction. _Deus Irae_? Of course, one recognizes that the lines blur. Is Star Wars sci fi because it has space ships, or fantasy because it has "magic"? Is Dick a sci-fi writer because often his stories are set in a "futuristic" context, or is he a short story writer in the classic sense because he often asks the important and essential questions that many writers have asked, or is he fantasy because his books have "fantastic" elements, not all of which are science or technologically based? Left Hand of Darkness is another case in point-it takes place on a foreign planet-is it fantsy then or sci fi? |
|
10-31-2004, 03:51 PM | #62 | |
Death of Mooters and [Entmoot] Internal Affairs
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 2,870
|
Defitions of sci-fi by some of the prominent authors:
"Modern science fiction is the only form of literature that consistently considers the nature of the changes that face us, the possible consequences, and the possible solutions." -Isac Asimov "Science Fiction is speculative fiction in which the author takes as his first postulate the real world as we know it, including all established facts and natural laws. The result can be extremely fantastic in content, but it is not fantasy; it is legitimate--and often very tightly reasoned--speculation about the possibilities of the real world. This category excludes rocket ships that make U-turns, serpent men of Neptune that lust after human maidens, and stories by authors who flunked their Boy Scout merit badge tests in descriptive astronomy." -Heinlein Quote:
Of course, whether fantasy, sci-fi, horror or romance: it's all literature.
__________________
Fëanor - Innocence incarnated Still, Aikanáro 'till the Last battle. Last edited by Falagar : 10-31-2004 at 03:55 PM. |
|
10-31-2004, 04:11 PM | #63 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Does that make PK Dick fantasy though? Most of his works tend to examine the inner psyche (valis, ubik, Martian Time-slip, Man in the High Castle, and yes, Electric Sheep)... but this is not something that is prevalent in fantasy literature. Btw, I happen to think that science fiction as a genre is just an extension of the fantasy genre, however, there is a clear demarcation generally between the two. And in the case of PK Dick's works, they are clearly set in futuristic worlds. There's not too much about the style that sets them out as fantasy literature.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
10-31-2004, 04:13 PM | #64 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
Perhaps I should have used Literture? Or called Tolkien the original modern epic form? |
|
11-01-2004, 12:24 AM | #65 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
|
|
11-01-2004, 01:36 AM | #66 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Well, for me fantasy is about the fantastical, the allusions to fables, magic, myth, quests, and so forth. Science fiction tends to be more 'factual'; the genre usually explores the impact of science upon society. It doesn't necessarily have to be set in a futuristic world for it to be science fiction, and like-wise for fantasy - it doesn't have to be set in by-gone eras. The separation between the two is usually defined by a shift in the approach to writer takes to the material. Fantasy being more fantastical, and science fiction being psuedo-factual, or factual. The aspect of PK Dick's writing that has me being inclined to think that he should be qualified as a science fiction writer is that he often writes about mental illness, and how the individual(s) react to society, and how society reacts to them. His stories tend to be quite intro-spective, and driven by the human condition. They're usually set in futuristic dystopic worlds. Whilst it has to be said that PK Dick doesn't conform to the hard sci-fi genre (like Greg Egan) or space operas, etc, he certainly has his share of "techno-babble" going on in his novel(la)s. To reiterate, the human condition is something to be studied, under the guise of science. Time travel is an aspect of science (depending on how it is employed). So on, and so forth. Now, if you were to ask me what genre Frank Herbert's Dune series were to fall under, I'd be a bit more hard-pressed to argue it for a strictly science-fiction stance. Something like that would fit more comfortably in a science-fantasy type genre.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
11-01-2004, 02:25 PM | #67 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
In no particular order... (once you reach the level of brilliance these five author's have acheived, ranking is impossible).
J.R.R. Tolkien, Stephen R. Lawhead, Jack Whyte, Robin McKinely, J.K. Rowling I've been thinking about this thread on and off for a while, and that's definitely my answer. Of course, I do have some honourable mentions to hand out...
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-02-2004, 11:14 AM | #68 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Heh. I'd say that Frank Herbert isn't even Science-fantasy. His whole universe is quite fantastical, and it is resplendant with the myth, the quest, the fable, and despite his presentation there is clearly more magic than science at work.
Hmm... My favorite authors. Hard to say, really, I tend to categorize them more as 'good' or 'bad'. Some are 'excellent'. Two that I can think of right away are Tolkien and Eddings. I can share my least favorite author, though - that's definitely Donaldson.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
11-02-2004, 02:13 PM | #69 | |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
The first book isn't really full of "technobabble", but the certainly, as the series progresses, technology becomes a more important factor
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
|
11-04-2004, 02:03 AM | #70 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 369
|
Quote:
Quote:
It doesn't necessarily have to be set in a futuristic world for it to be science fiction, and like-wise for fantasy - it doesn't have to be set in by-gone eras. The separation between the two is usually defined by a shift in the approach to writer takes to the material. Fantasy being more fantastical, and science fiction being psuedo-factual, or factual. The aspect of PK Dick's writing that has me being inclined to think that he should be qualified as a science fiction writer is that he often writes about mental illness, and how the individual(s) react to society, and how society reacts to them. His stories tend to be quite intro-spective, and driven by the human condition. They're usually set in futuristic dystopic worlds. Whilst it has to be said that PK Dick doesn't conform to the hard sci-fi genre (like Greg Egan) or space operas, etc, he certainly has his share of "techno-babble" going on in his novel(la)s. To reiterate, the human condition is something to be studied, under the guise of science. Time travel is an aspect of science (depending on how it is employed). So on, and so forth. Now, if you were to ask me what genre Frank Herbert's Dune series were to fall under, I'd be a bit more hard-pressed to argue it for a strictly science-fiction stance. Something like that would fit more comfortably in a science-fantasy type genre.[/QUOTE] Obviously we disagree. |
||
11-04-2004, 02:32 PM | #71 | |||
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
Quote:
In the world of Dune, I've always felt Herbert takes what would traditionally be called 'magic' and tries to present it as psuedo-science. The mind powers of the Bene Gesserit, the ability to see the future, the various cults (the Bene Gesserit, the navigators guild, the Mentats, the swordmasters) with their special powers and uncanny abilities which don't have any firm grounding in fact - they're explained away in the same way I always tease my little brothers with things they don't understand: 'Oh, it's magic' 'Oh, it's a result of breeding/special training/drug use'.
There's some genuine technology - the ships, the lasrifles, the shields... but by and large, most of what drives the society is essentially magic. There is certainly a great deal of similarity to that other Space Opera (Star Wars). I'd tend to characterize them both as more fantasy than Scifi, though Dune has always seemed even less 'science-y' than SW. In the one case, we've got plenty of technology, and one instance of magic that is used by a very few people. In the other case, we've got only a few instances of technology and many instances of what I'd call magic. And before anyone else brings it up: I've never bought into the 'advanced technology is the same as magic' explaination. I think that's a lame excuse. Technology is external and mechanical, and takes advantage of natural laws to produce a predictable result. It can be explained and understood. Magic just happens. So... er... anyway. Not that we're off-topic, has anybody read Jack Vance? I haven't, actually, but it's appearently from his writing that we get one word for what I just did to this thread - to pnume.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
|||
11-24-2004, 06:15 PM | #72 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 256
|
my favs are:
JRR Tolkien CS Lewis Lloyd Alexander |
11-25-2004, 01:39 AM | #73 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
I agree with BoP on this, Forkbeard. Fantasy to me is involving normally a more medieval type setting. Industry isn't involved. Rifles are rarely permitted. Cars, space ships, ray guns and such aren't permitted. Magic, quests, a general medieval type format, perhaps some strange monsters and races that are of a mythological/legendary nature. High technology is normally not permitted, unless perhaps it's highly bonded with magic. This is perhaps not the correct definition of fantasy, but it is the definition of fantasy that is normally accepted. Sci-fi is more technology based. Normally it is based on the future. Fantasy is more medieval based. Normally it is based on the past. Those are the images that come into most people's minds when they think of fantasy or sci-fi. They may not be correct, but that's just the normal.
Of course, my view may not be important to you . Though it should be! I mean, duh! Who's broadly acknowledged as the smartest person on Entmoot? Anyhow, I leave you to attempt to respond to my post .
__________________
If the world has indeed, as I have said, been built of sorrow, it has been built by the hands of love, because in no other way could the soul of man, for whom the world was made, reach the full stature of its perfection. ~Oscar Wilde, written from prison Oscar Wilde's last words: "Either the wallpaper goes, or I do." Last edited by Lief Erikson : 11-25-2004 at 01:43 AM. |
11-29-2004, 04:37 PM | #74 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheshire, UK... w00tage!
Posts: 43
|
Dah! I hate it when people do this to me! I try to think of my favourite writers...and they disappear...hmm
In no order: Chris Paolini Garth Nix Tim Bowler Philip Pullman Cornelia Funke Gail Carson Levine Woo! Go me!
__________________
Three rings for the Elven-kings under the sky, Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone, Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die, One for the Dark Lord on his throne In the land of Mordor where the shadows lie. One Ring to rule them all, One ring to find them, One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them, In the land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. |
11-29-2004, 05:12 PM | #75 | |
The Lovely Hobbit-Lass
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bounded in a nut-shell
Posts: 1,593
|
Quote:
__________________
It's New Years Day, just like the day before; Same old skies of grey, same empty bottles on the floor. Another year's gone by, and I was thinking once again, How can I take this losing hand and somehow win? Just give me One Good Year To get my feet back on the ground. I've been chasing grace; Grace ain't so easily found One bad hand can devil a man, chase him and carry him down. I've got to get out of here, just give me One Good Year! |
|
11-29-2004, 05:24 PM | #76 |
The Supreme Lord of The Northern Eagles
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: trondheim, norway
Posts: 1,388
|
my alltime favourite is J.R.R. Tolkien. all of his works.
C.S Lewis and Robert Jordan afterwards. thats all the fantasy authours I have read something of. and besides I think Lief is right about what is fantasy.
__________________
Don't Panic! Last edited by Pytt : 11-29-2004 at 05:25 PM. |
11-29-2004, 09:36 PM | #77 | |
avocatus diaboli
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himring
Posts: 1,582
|
Quote:
in order (I think...) 6) Terry Brooks 7)Anne McCaffrey 8) George RR Martin & Robert Jordan 10) Ursula LeGuin oh! I'll respond to Lief. I agree completely. It seems to me that good sci-fi tends to romanticise a futuristic world, while good fantasy usually romanticises a world of the past. My brother and I look at sci-fi as the dreams of the mind; and fantasy as the dreams of the soul.
__________________
~ I have heard the languages of apocalypse and now I shall embrace the silence ~
Neil Gaiman Last edited by Elemmírë : 11-29-2004 at 09:39 PM. |
|
12-02-2004, 03:42 PM | #78 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Elemire!!! You put Brooks ahead of Jordan??? How could you??? And over Earthsea? TRAITOR!!!!!!!
Oh; my top 5 1: Norse, Celtic and Greek Mythology. The earliest sources of brilliance 1: Tolkien (who else) (tie) 3: Lucas (Star Wars has both fantasy and sci fi elements) 4: Robert Jordan 5: Ursula K. Leguinn 6: Terry Brooks 7: George R.R. Martin 8: Salvatore 9: Piers Anthony 10: someone I forgot about honorable mention: Terry Pratchett. |
12-02-2004, 10:42 PM | #79 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
At least she can spell "LeGuin"...
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
12-02-2004, 11:15 PM | #80 |
avocatus diaboli
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Himring
Posts: 1,582
|
Nice one, Boppy.
You got that, Finnrodde? By the way, Finnrodde, my name is Elemmire, not Elemire. Also known as Amarie, Ungoliant, 'Mire, LM, Ellie, and.... Boggy. (didn't leave anything out, did I?) And I happen to like Brooks better than Jordan. I can't recall one of the books that disappointed me at all... though I could be wrong. The LeGuin... I don't know. I was having trouble putting them in order. And I completely forgot Star Wars. Everyone, bump that up to #2 behind Tolkien. Well... #6, I guess it was... By the way, everyone, Finnrodde is my brother. Hopefully he will have the sense eventually to start a new account using the name "Finrod" since it by itself is still untaken... Or a new name altogether... how about Orondil or Orondur? I think that would translate well enough from your real name, Highlander.
__________________
~ I have heard the languages of apocalypse and now I shall embrace the silence ~
Neil Gaiman Last edited by Elemmírë : 12-02-2004 at 11:18 PM. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The trouble with fantasy... | IronParrot | Fantasy and Sci-Fi Novels | 39 | 04-14-2004 01:28 AM |
Atheists and Fantasy | Gwaimir Windgem | General Messages | 75 | 11-11-2003 11:30 AM |
Fantasy Writer's Forum Petition: | Gwaimir Windgem | Writer's Workshop | 67 | 04-23-2003 04:39 PM |
Falling Into Fantasy | Starr Polish | General Messages | 24 | 03-28-2003 05:48 AM |
The Surging Popularity of Fantasy | Keith K | Middle Earth | 3 | 11-27-2002 01:09 AM |