09-26-2002, 02:38 AM | #61 | |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Quote:
But back to topic... did you notice in the film that Elrond's version of the Isildur's refusal to destroy the ring left out Cirdan? Well, I'm just saying Interesting footnote. My 8 year old asked me if her could be Isildur for Halloween. The main thing I like about the movie is that it has raised his interest in the story.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
|
09-26-2002, 05:26 AM | #62 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
I just *hate* to be proven right but you folks made it easy on me. =)
BeardofPants, you originally said the movie left you cold because of the plumped up action scenes. But when I pushed you for a response, what I got was a comparison of the movie's action versus what was found in the book rather than an analysis of the film based on its own merits. As I suspected all along, when we get down to the nitty gritty, what you really didn't like about the movie is that Jackson wasn't able to offer you YOUR mental version of the book. You have every right to feel this way if you wish, I guess. But the elitist snobbery of this position galls me. How anyone can profess to love the book and yet be unwilling to recognize Jackson's stunning accomplishment is beyond belief. I have to smile when I read that Jackson resorted to "tired" and "tried and true" fantasy formula because Tolkien WROTE the damn formula. He's in a no-win situation--he's blasted when he follows the book and blasted when he doesn't. Lastly, personal tastes are...well, personal. But the ongoing commentary here about the academy awards, Titanic, and My Heart Will Go On, only reinforces the observation that there are some posters here that are absolutely horrified at the thought that THEIR beloved Tolkien world has become...gasp...popular with the masses and their stupid award shows!!! |
09-26-2002, 06:26 AM | #63 | ||
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
We are not things. |
||
09-26-2002, 06:33 AM | #64 | ||
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Quote:
Well I'm sorry but that's the platform you gave me; I am unsure how else to discuss my point that the movie was "plumped up action scenes" when the very platform you gave me to start off with was a comparison between Tolkien and PJ. If you did not want such a comparison, then why start off with one in the first place? Over to you again. Regarding bringing tolkien to the masses, I couldn't be more pleased. It means that there are more people out there that I can discuss Tolkien with! And it is to the movie itself that I am reading the Histories of Middle Earth. Finally: I will pull this quote to your attention again, since it best sums up my thoughts regarding the movie. Quote:
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords Last edited by BeardofPants : 09-26-2002 at 06:43 AM. |
||
09-26-2002, 09:13 AM | #65 |
im quite stupid
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cockermouth
Posts: 2,058
|
the fool the fool picking a fight with BoP dont you know shes pure evil
__________________
Yeah god hes ok but i would rather be judged by a sheep than that idiot |
09-26-2002, 09:54 AM | #66 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
Great. Another newbie know-it-all. Been there, done that, and it ain't pretty watching from this end.
O Ebony Device For Detection of Serum Levels of Ethanol, you have proved nothing more than that you are rather obsessed with setting up straw men so you can crow in victory when you knock them down. You have YET to prove your own premise that BoP, or any OTHER poster here, is a purist. You have yet to prove your own premise that BoP's objections to the film are based in that desire to keep out the "unwashed masses" from the ranks of Tolkiendom. You also have yet to prove that a derision of the obviously political and highly incestuous nature of the Academy Awards and their underserving recipients somehow translates into an inability to contemplate the pros or cons of a particular film. One COULD point to your own sheep-like parroting of Academy Awards and popular approval as marks of quality in a film. You could not be more incorrect if you tried. The vast majority of fine film does NOT get awards nor massive public acclaim; Lord of the Rings is one exception to that rule, however. I loved the film, I loved the "action scenes", and the soundtrack grew on me after a time after an initial humdrum acceptance. I thought the additions of real-time action replacing flashbacks was effective and assisted in the storytelling in film style. I do, however, also feel that the film could have been made a lot more true to the original source without having to resort to rewriting the story line, dialogue, or characters. To me, the Lord of the Rings is a perfect story in book form. I think Peter Jackson did a fine job in his film interpretation but failed to bring the full scope and beauty of the original masterwork to the screen by diverting off on tangents not included nor contemplated in the original story. So, purist I am, so freaking sue me. But that "purism" does not also correspond to a desire to keep outsiders out of my private world. I love the entire universe of Middle-Earth, and have loved it, imagined it in endless reverie, and have re-travelled that long, long road to Orodruin with Frodo many, many times. And each time I read the book, I saw that here was a rare treasure of insight and creativity, and that what was contained therein was of TREMENDOUS benefit to all people, not just the few who picked up the books and persevered all the way to "Well, I'm back." You have continually shown that you only read the parts of what others write which you can use to back up your assertions, you have shown you level an accusation against someone and refuse to back off that assertion even when proved consistently wrong, and have also shown you are more interested in starting conflict between posters because they disagree with you rather than argue with them in reasoned discourse. You may think you have been "proven right", cowboy, but you're telling us the sky is green when we know dadgum well it is a nice shade of azure.
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. |
09-26-2002, 10:54 AM | #67 |
im quite stupid
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cockermouth
Posts: 2,058
|
You all make good points. But been a nice nutral that i am this is how i look at it. The film is the tale of the war of the ring. the book is the tale of the hobbits journey and self discovery. In the book its from the point of view of the hobbits allways. In the film its from the point of view of men (aragorn) this is probably to help the uninlighed of us feel more at ease i mean who cares about short guys with hairy feet?
Ill take BoP up on one thing i thought the ending of the movie was very well done and i had a tear in my eye. Frodos choices were not demished at all. i love his chat with aragorn even though he did offer that damn ring to allmost everyone in the film. His and sams convo was beautiful and the flashback then his eyes as he goes to the boat very nicely done. I dont like it when people reduce a film to base elements eg car chace sex scean trip to casino cos well uve a bond movie right there but its not what films are about its about the way they are played out on screan. Black breatliser BoP is not a purist sure she likes tolkien but im sure she is of intelgent enough mind not to just say oh that was crap cos she likes the books. She obvosly didnt like a lot of the film. seeing from other thread shes not really into big set peice films she seems to like lots of convo and character development and stuff like that (her poor bf ) I love the film its my number 1 of all time but even i can tell its a very diffrent tale from the book and just cos you like the book does not mean you will like the film.
__________________
Yeah god hes ok but i would rather be judged by a sheep than that idiot |
09-26-2002, 11:03 AM | #68 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
Good points there, Sween. You need to change your "byline", though, 'cause you're anything BUT stupid. It's pretty obvious that dyslexia doesn't hinder a person's reasoning skills. Good on ya.
Time to watch my faves, Manchester United, against the Tottenham Hot Spurs.......and I ain't lookin' at the Moot til the game's over 'cause I don' wan' no one telling me the outcome!
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. |
09-26-2002, 11:06 AM | #69 | |
im quite stupid
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cockermouth
Posts: 2,058
|
Quote:
__________________
Yeah god hes ok but i would rather be judged by a sheep than that idiot |
|
09-26-2002, 03:28 PM | #70 | |||
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Quote:
Quote:
However, the whole ending with the "Boss Fight"... ergh. And Frodo having to consort with Aragorn regarding his decision; again... ergh. Another instance of the "weakening"/cowardisation of hobbits, IMO. Quote:
And thanks also to Bropous, again.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords Last edited by BeardofPants : 09-26-2002 at 03:31 PM. |
|||
09-26-2002, 04:05 PM | #71 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: minneapolis MN
Posts: 920
|
Quote:
__________________
Gandalf lives...oh and Frodo too. Haldir Lives!!! |
|
09-26-2002, 04:29 PM | #72 | |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Quote:
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
|
09-26-2002, 04:36 PM | #73 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: minneapolis MN
Posts: 920
|
Quote:
__________________
Gandalf lives...oh and Frodo too. Haldir Lives!!! |
|
09-26-2002, 04:46 PM | #74 | |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Quote:
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
|
09-26-2002, 04:47 PM | #75 |
Lady of Letters
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Either Oxford or Kent, England
Posts: 2,476
|
Newbie though I am, I like being a purist. By all accounts Tolkien himself was the ultimate purist, so it's nothing to be ashamed of
__________________
And all the time the waves, the waves, the waves Chase, intersect and flatten on the sand As they have done for centuries, as they will For centuries to come, when not a soul Is left to picnic on the blazing rocks, When England is not England, when mankind Has blown himself to pieces. Still the sea, Consolingly disastrous, will return While the strange starfish, hugely magnified, Waits in the jewelled basin of a pool. |
09-26-2002, 05:41 PM | #76 |
im quite stupid
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cockermouth
Posts: 2,058
|
i personally feel that Pj is saving a lot of the development of a characters esspecially the hobbits for the next 2. the hobbits in the book are pretty much in there hero phase as they leave the shire they are organised and prepared. They also had a much better idea of what they were facing.
key characters like gollum get but a passing mention in the film. by the end of all the movies the movie aragorn will be the book aragorn i bet.
__________________
Yeah god hes ok but i would rather be judged by a sheep than that idiot |
09-26-2002, 08:59 PM | #77 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
The trouble when book fans see a movie adaption is that there is a tendency to want to play back-seat movie director. There is nothing wrong with someone saying "hey, the movie was not my cup of tea." But when Tolkien book fans say they don't like the movie for one reason or another, I suspect that its because they have been subbornly unwilling - or perhaps unable - to judge the film on its own merits.
In the case of BoP, she said she didn't like all the action. I asked her why. She responded by telling me how different the movie was from the book and how the action cut into the character development she was hoping for. That's cool. She's entitled to her opinion. My point is simply that whenever vocal critics of the movie use the book to defend their negative views, its hard not to believe that the real issue is unmet expectations. Going into a movie with expectations of watching your own book vision broadcast to you in living color on the big screen is guaranteed to leave anyone disappointed. If I've given some of you a hard time, it's only because I've "been there, done that." I saw the movie on Midnight on opening night and came away from the experience with mixed feelings and at a loss to say how I felt about it. On one level, I knew I had watched a very high quality production with great acting, an inspired soundtrack, and wonderful sets, yet I felt disturbed and a little disappointed. When I had a chance to reflect back on what had happened to me, I realized that I hadn't had a normal movie experience where I was able to lose myself into the screen. Why? Because I spent the entire movie analyzing every detail and tearing each scene apart in my head ('yeah, okay, okay, this is right,' or 'no-no-no, this isn't the way I pictured it.'). After I got over my initial shock of seeing the world and the people I loved since I was 14 come to life on the screen slightly different from what I had imagined it all, I was able to relax and let all that stuff go and free myself to watch the film again (uh, and again and again...) and enjoy it for the unique story it was telling me without feeling compelled to compare it unfavorably against the book I knew so well. There is no reason to get into a book versus film comparison (or arguement.) Tolkien didn't write a fantasy novel, he devoted much of his adult life to writing a modern mythology for England. Like the Greek, Roman, and Norse mythologies of old, Tolkiens stories are now being retold and refashioned. While some of his followers may feel that any change - "for good or ill" - to Tolkien's words is sacrelegious, I believe Tolkien would have understood what was happening to his work and may have actually felt validated by it. Sincerely, "Another Newbie Know-it-all" =) |
09-26-2002, 10:43 PM | #78 |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Well BB, that was a better articulation of your point and you did'nt even have to pat yourself on the back. Of course movies are always disappointing when compared to a book. I was just reading the Prancing Pony chapter. The development was so much better because there is narration to every detail and feeling on the part of every character. This would be extremely difficult to convey in film without extensively expanding dialog or adding narrative, neither of which would improve the story. This is, however, exactly why some people don't like the movie as much as the book. Since the topic of the thread is "Peter Jackson improved Tolkien" it would make sense that these individuals would disagree with this pronouncement. Since you have said you felt the same way but then put your fellings aside, I find it hard to understand your intolerance for this point of view. It's not that anyone hates the movie. Everyone here has seen it many times. The simple point is that they don't think PJ improved Tolkien.
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
09-26-2002, 11:10 PM | #79 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
I disagree, Cirdan. Once purists put aside their built-in book prejudices and view the film more objectively, they might actually acknowledge that there are indeed small areas where the movie's storyline or characterizations enhanced book fans' appreciation of the Lord of the Rings characters and story.
I respect that there can be different opinions on this subject. But when a confessed Tolkienite says he doesn't like a movie that millions have embraced and that clearly captures the essence of Tolkien's great work, I question their objectivity and/or their motivations. |
09-26-2002, 11:31 PM | #80 | |
Viggoholic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,749
|
Quote:
__________________
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Research paper on Tolkien | The Telcontarion | Writer's Workshop | 10 | 12-16-2007 12:04 PM |
Whats on your Bookshelf? | hectorberlioz | General Literature | 135 | 02-12-2007 07:26 PM |
The Jackson haters A to Z | Curufinwe | Lord of the Rings Movies | 4 | 01-25-2004 03:44 AM |
Follow on from Gandalf v. HP...Tolkien v. Peter Jackson! | Elf.Freak | Entertainment Forum | 3 | 01-22-2003 02:22 PM |
a little orientation needed | DrFledermaus | The Silmarillion | 9 | 02-12-2001 05:48 AM |