01-09-2009, 09:50 PM | #641 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Earniel, that article was quite interesting. The bacteria clearly mutated over time and acquired a new ability to utilize a substrate previously unavailable to it as an energy source. But it also did not become other than E. coli. So from my recollection of microbiology in general this is mutation in an organism and not evolution of or into another.
In general one could hypothesize that such a series of mutations under the guidance of natural forces favoring particular mutations with a survival advantage in those conditions could lead to an organism different from the earlier organism - a new species. This is not demonstrated here. What is demonstrated is the ability of mutations to occur and under certain conditions to favor continued existence of the strain within the established species. Clearly mutations that are not lethal to the organism may confer a survival advantage to be expressed later when conditions are right. My personal favorite was the testing of bacteria cultured from permafrost frozen English sailors in Alaska for antibiotic sensitivities and/or resistance. Amazingly, the bacteria were from 300 years or so prior to antibiotics and yet they had the capability of being resistant! Until the pressure of medical antibiotic usage was applied, this capability was unused. But these bacteria were still clearly in their major groupings of Staph, Strep, etc. Similarly, the recovery of the flu virus of 1918's pandemic has allowed study of its mutations since that time and helped in the understanding of which factors render virulence stronger. But these are still identifiable flu viruses. So, mutation occurs. Like the bumper sticker says! IR and Earniel, yes, some transitional fossils have been found and one expects more to be found. My question was how many of these would be considered necessary for validation of the theory. Observation and all that sort of thing about the repetitive nature of the process. IR, I am a fossil, it's true. Baconian methodology and evidence requirements and observational evaluations....... ... and too evolutionary for some creationist types and too delusional for some less-than-stringent-scientism-ists . I often feel that I am indeed meeting my purpose in life!:cool . Gaffer, it's plain and simple eugenics. You could do the same thing by killing all the identified carriers of the genetic defect (which is, of course, what "disposing of affected embryos" means) at any age before reproduction. So, why not screen the general population in the first and second grades and "dispose of" all the identified carriers. The solace of having prevented their passing on the defective gene should more than compensate for the difficulties encountered in their disposal. We have indeed seen this before: http://www.nodussolutions.com/Medica...et/History.htm "In 1920, two distinguished German scholars, the law professor Karl Binding and the medical doctor Alfred Hoche, wrote the crucial work “The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life” (Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens).' Margaret Sanger's work in America to keep the inferior races down (and she meant negroes, Irish, and oriental immigrants) and the eugenics movement in America are well documented but little understood or researched. With prenatal diagnosis the opportunity is to kill off the affected individuals before they are born. More expensive but less messy. The bodies are only a few cells or so as opposed to all those nasty corpses. And the ovens would probably contribute to global warming too, now that I think of it.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-09-2009, 10:16 PM | #642 | |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
Alright, inked, I think we're getting close to the "agree to disagree" stage, where no number of fossils or amount of observable evidence pointing to evolution will convince you because you always demand another example. But here goes at least once more:
From "The Beak of the Finch" (Jonathan Weiner, Vintage Books, 1994). p 234-5 Quote:
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
|
01-10-2009, 07:02 AM | #643 | ||
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
I have always found the adherence to species a bit ambiguous. Species is a system we impose on the world to make sense of it. Every fossil that looks a little bit different is classified as a different species. Even modern species are often still continually devided into new species, like the African elephant, or the giraffe for instance. Even among amphibians, there have been a number of recent changes in the classification. Are the animals suddenly changed? No, it's only our understanding of them that has changed, and their species-classification often changed accordingly. Quote:
__________________
We are not things. |
||
01-10-2009, 11:59 PM | #644 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Popperian, eh? Thank you, Earniel. I learned something today. If I understand the wikipedia entry on Popper and falsifiability, I'm not sure he would have regarded evolution as science necessarily, would have he? Is evolution falsifiable in his sense?
But no amount of observation does not mean that a hypothesis elevated to theory will not be disproved tomorrow...now, that I can agree with wholeheartedly. But in the meantime we can trust the hypotheses elevated to theories on the basis of serial, repetetive observations of successful predictions, yes. Just like Newtonian physics semed absolute until Mercury's orbit wouldn't do as predicted and ...... voila! Einstein und de special relativity and general relativity and ...... quantum mechanics und probabalistics which Einstein did NOT like .... You get my drift, I hope.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-16-2009, 12:22 AM | #645 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Absolutely... if one cannot argue science, they hide behind philosophy.
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
01-16-2009, 04:49 PM | #646 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Yes, BJ, and we shan't remind you that scientists were known as natural philosophers before they were called scientists. You might lose faith, or whatever it is you have in them....
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-24-2009, 07:46 PM | #647 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Doomed, DOomed,DOOmed,DOOMed,DOOMEd, DOOMED
Mr Gaia tells all:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...rue&print=true Goodbye, Cruel Gaia, you're going to miss us when we are gone! You have one last chance to cut back on your 90% contribution to global warming or we are toasted - just like 99% of all the species that have ever been! O cruel, cruel Gaia!
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-25-2009, 08:31 PM | #648 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
|
|
01-25-2009, 10:41 PM | #649 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
Or, better, if by free-wheeling down Suicide Hill your car gets up to 90kph, and Deadman's Curve at the bottom has an Absolute Top Speed Limit of 90kmh, it's okay to step on the gas to get it up to 100, because you're only contributing 10kph to the total speed.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
01-26-2009, 12:47 AM | #650 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Mr Gaia pointed out that human contribution to carbon production was essentially negligible and of no consequence to the cycle and therefore doom is unavoidably certain.
Not to mention he debunked the whole carbon offset fudge offered at a price by the developer of the Internet and rewarded with a high minded prize of some sort as an homage to futility in this chap's view. Now, who do you believe? Mr. Gaia theorist or the Al Gore-ithem? (Hint the comments were either *ironic* or *sarcastic* or *flippant* or *deeply held to be true by some and Mr.Gaia* or all of the above.)
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
01-26-2009, 09:53 AM | #651 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
That said, there's a lot less scientific basis for Dr. Lovelock's self-regulating system (the Earth as one massive unified organism), and although I like the theory it is far from supported (though far from disproved) by science as of yet. You seem to be under mistaken impression that he believes human-induce global warming is neglible Far from it. Dr. Lovelock is from what I've read, an advocate of nuclear power as a result of this and advocates a complete stop in coal-powered energy facilities (He even speaks about funnelling large amounts of CO2 down into the deep oceans, a very intiguing idea which could make a real signifiance!) He seems to believe we've crossed the threshold of a point of no return (speaks about it in that article), but there are so many differing forecasts about this and it is near impossible to make predictions, much less come with concrete dates. I am at least very sceptical to concrete future predictions about the world's global system that take place 100 years into the future: it's just too advanced for us to possibly predict that most of the world's population will wither away by then! |
|
01-26-2009, 05:23 PM | #652 | |
Entmoot Attorney-General,
Equilibrating the Scales of Justice, Administrator ♎ Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,891
|
Quote:
So maybe someday some of my stem cells will find a new host. That's a cool thought, I think
__________________
An unwritten post is a delightful universe of infinite possibilities. Set down one word, however, and it immediately becomes earthbound. Set down one sentence and it’s halfway to being just like every other bloody entry that’s ever been written. ☻ |
|
01-27-2009, 12:49 AM | #653 | |
Entmoot Secretary of the Treasury
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Campsite-by-Giraffe
Posts: 5,408
|
Quote:
When I have more time, I'd like to post a few of my own.
__________________
KI6PFA Amateur Radio Operator
|
|
01-29-2009, 11:36 PM | #654 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
No, inked, you've totally misread the article. What Lovelock is saying is that though the amount of carbon produced by humans is enough to put us over the tipping point on global warming, it's still small enough that there are measures we can take to counter the effect.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
01-29-2009, 11:43 PM | #655 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
02-01-2009, 10:28 PM | #656 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
BJ, I'm right for the wrong reasons! I love it!
Purely unscientifically, Christians believe that we shall outlast even the universe in its (take your pick) a) cold death due to never ending expansion, b) the big crunch when expansion reverses, c) all the never ending cosmos ends up as a uniform field of low energy/low mass steady state. All have been proposed by science as the ultimate end; but where in the timeline of science? And, TWIMC, I intended no disrespect by failure to use the title appropriate to this gentleman. It was not indicated in the article. By the by, I don't think I misread it. The 90% of carbon output is natural. And that output has demonstrably been up and down several times over the billenia.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
02-02-2009, 12:15 AM | #657 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
We'll be taken out by an asteroid or the death of our sun long before any of those things.
The thankful part (for us), is that even the major effects of warming are well beyond our lifespan. We have all been born in a good time to be human, make the most of it!
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
02-02-2009, 08:10 PM | #658 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
BJ, should we (that is the persons now alive) just live it up since we won't pay consequences for our behaviours? Or did you mean that humans should live it up before the asteroid impact renders our poor materialist existence impossible? And, if the latter, why exactly should we be responsible for use of resources to whom?
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
02-03-2009, 10:45 PM | #659 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
It's something we should be thankful for. Not that long ago, death was much more common and existence relatively short. And the future may very well bring similar conditions, or worse. Most of the choices involving polluting and using up our environment apply just as much to the quality of our own future, unless you are quite old. Even if you choose not to believe in the more long term global warming issues. But, ultimately, we are doomed to be no more... not even a memory. So some tempered enjoyment along the way wouldn't be the worst path to follow.
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
02-04-2009, 03:25 PM | #660 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Hmmm..."should is a very moralistic term", eh? Then how does your requisite enjoyment of anything in the face of the total inconsequence of anything existent now or ever fail to be a "should"?
""Should" is a very moralistic term. I was merely addressing reality. We currently exist in a unique frame of time. A few hundred years where humanity can live an prosper in a way never seen before. It's something we should be thankful for." To whom or what, I must ask? To be thankful for means to be thankful to someone for something? "Not that long ago, death was much more common and existence relatively short. And the future may very well bring similar conditions, or worse." Last I heard, death was still at 100% worldwide. Average life expectancy globally remains at 45 - which it was 100 years ago in the USA (but due to our terrible healthcare system now is only 88 for females and 78 for males - oh, my how horrible). The future is sure to continue the present just as it has done for the past: tomorrow's death rate will be at 100% and for most of mankind life will be nasty, brutish, and short. Really fortunate victims may die before their statistically average 45 years are up and be spared the angst of enduring their lack of meaning or worth until that time. Aborted babies will be the most fortunate at not having to endure any of their lives, so they may be regarded as having achieved the highest possible good in the shortest amount of time - if you happen to regard them as human, of course. Polluting? Using up resources? "But, ultimately, we are doomed to be no more... not even a memory. So some tempered enjoyment along the way wouldn't be the worst path to follow." Since nothing ends in nothing having arisen from nothing, there is no imperative to conserve or not pollute. There is, in fact, no reason for "tempered enjoyment" nor a better or "the worst path" to follow. There is no reason to do anything other than consume in one wild long party into the blackness of non-meaning and non-existence. Watch for your invitation to this party! Everyone who is anyone - and who doesn't become nothing before arriving - will be there. But only for the briefest of times on a cosmic scale and never. Gee, BJ, you make it all so..............meaningless.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paradise Lost | Brill | General Literature | 106 | 01-10-2014 08:13 PM |
GOOD new/recent Science Fiction/Fantasy? | bropous | Fantasy and Sci-Fi Novels | 4 | 03-12-2007 01:36 PM |
Why you believe what you believe I | Rían | General Messages | 1173 | 02-01-2005 03:56 PM |
Science Museum. | Arian | General Messages | 13 | 03-01-2002 11:13 PM |
Science Fiction Books Worth Reading | Quazar | Fantasy and Sci-Fi Novels | 2 | 12-18-2001 11:42 AM |