08-05-2010, 02:48 PM | #621 |
Cardboard Harp of Gondor Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IM IN UR POSTZ, EDITIN' UR WURDZ
Posts: 6,433
|
Interesting news. Looks like a judge has overturned proposition 8, and it's on it's way back to the court of appeals, and then the supreme court. It'll be interesting to see what the people around me (at the Churches, at school, etc.) have to say, if they even notice it. It seems like not as big a deal is being made this time, but then again possibly I'm missing the outlets where it's being mentioned. I wouldn't have even known if a friend hadn't mentioned it to me.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lano...-marriage.html |
08-06-2010, 12:05 AM | #622 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Mixed feelings. Prop 8 would probably have been overturned in 2012, but this is (strictly on the merits) a great decision.
Tactically, maybe not so much. It seems unlikely that the current Supreme Court would overturn all laws (including state constitutional bans) against gay marriage, but it probably comes down to Kennedy- and Dahlia Lithwick at Slate points out that Judge Walker cites Kennedy 15 times in his decision. http://www.slate.com/
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-06-2010, 12:09 AM | #623 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
And I think people are going to notice it indeed.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-07-2010, 02:37 PM | #624 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Wow. A homosexual judge overturns PROP 8 (http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-02-0...n-judge-walker).
__________________________________________________ _____________ This is going to the Supreme Court ... ***Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F 3d 859, 8th Circuit (2006): Indeed, in Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972), when faced with a Fourteenth Amendment challenge to a decision by the Supreme Court of Minnesota denying a marriage license to a same-sex couple, the United States Supreme Court dismissed “for want of a substantial federal question.” (Emphasis added.) There is good reason for this restraint. As we have explained, Appellees’ attempt to isolate § 29 from laws prohibiting same-sex marriage because it is a state constitutional amendment fails. If there is no constitutional right to same-sex marriage, that is, if a statutory prohibition satisfies rational-basis review, then § 29 likewise survives rational-basis review. We hold that § 29 and other laws limiting the state-recognized institution of marriage to heterosexual couples are rationally related to legitimate state interests and therefore do not violate the Constitution of the United States. *** If it's not unconstitutional in the 8th Circuit, how is it in the 9th? __________________________________________________ _________ "In a breathtaking and brief sentence, Judge Walker asserted: "Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals." Until this verdict, such language had never appeared in a decision of a Federal court. If gender is no longer "an essential part of marriage," then marriage has been essentially redefined right before our eyes. The religious liberty dimensions of the decision are momentous and deeply troubling. While Judge Walker declared that the religious freedoms of citizens and religious bodies were not violated because no such body is required to recognize or perform same-sex marriage, the very structure of his argument condemned religious and theological objections to homosexuality and same-sex marriage as both harmful and irrational. Beyond this, Judge Walker claimed to read the minds of California's voters, arguing that the majority voted for Proposition 8 based on religious opposition to homosexuality, which he then rejected as an illegitimate state interest. In essence, this establishes secularism as the only acceptable basis for moral judgment on the part of voters. The judge's statements condemning religious opposition to homosexuality speak for themselves in terms of animus." http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/...0.html?start=1 I haven't read all 162 pages, (see here... http://metroweekly.com/poliglot/2010...20Decision.pdf) but I think he forgot the Dalai Lama, the Buddhists, the Hindus and the Islamics, but, hey, we all KNOW that it's only Christians who oppose this sort of stuff, right?
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
08-08-2010, 01:35 AM | #625 |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
"Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage; marriage under law is a union of equals"
As you can tell by the second half of what you quoted, Inked, what Judge Walker is referring to is that states used to have laws like coverture, which resulted in the infamous legal dictum that "husband and wife are one person under the law, and that person is the husband," which explicitly defined legal roles for a man and a woman in marriage. Those sorts of gender-based laws about marriage are off the books now; marriage is, legally, a union of two equal partners, with no reference to their gender other than, in some states, the explicit requirement, as in Prop 8, that they be of different genders. As the judge points out, and I believe correctly, this implies that there is, legally speaking, no reason for that last requirement - it does not cause the fulfillment of anything else within the marriage contract.
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
08-08-2010, 09:46 AM | #626 |
Best Ex-Administrator ever
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 60,547
|
Well done people of California in a step towards civilisation. Wherever the people of America leads, the world tends to follow. Also, it's always very satisfying to see advocates of extreme bigotry riled. Well done again!
|
08-08-2010, 10:40 AM | #627 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
So Judge Walker shouldn't rule on this because he is homosexual and thus might be prejudiced.
Though of course a heterosexual judge might also be prejudiced the other way. What do you suggest? A bisexual judge? A transexual? A eunuch? I suspect your ideal would be that just as gays shouldn't rule on isssues involving gays, blacks shouldn't be allowed to judge on issues involving racism, women shouldn't judge on issues involving women, Latinos can't judge on issues involving Latinos or immigration, non-Christians can't judge on issues involving religion- in fact that all judging should be done by straight white Christian males, because of course they are the only ones who aren't prejudiced.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-08-2010, 10:50 AM | #628 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
"If it's not unconstitutional in the 8th Circuit, how is it in the 9th?"
Hmmm, that's a toughie...how about, because Appellate Courts often rule in different ways and that's one reason there is a Supreme Court in the first place? (Think about the name- the Supreme Court- that's kind of a hint)
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-08-2010, 10:57 AM | #629 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
And who is Judge Walker?
Quote:
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
08-08-2010, 11:17 AM | #630 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
08-08-2010, 06:31 PM | #631 |
Dread Mothy Lord and Halfwitted Apprentice Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 10,820
|
Not "people of California," Judge Walker. The people of California are the ones who voted Prop 8 in the first place. Clearly, though, they didn't know what they really wanted.
__________________
Crux fidelis, inter omnes arbor una nobilis. Nulla talem silva profert, fronde, flore, germine. Dulce lignum, dulce clavo, dulce pondus sustinens. 'With a melon?' - Eric Idle |
08-08-2010, 07:35 PM | #632 | |
Best Ex-Administrator ever
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 60,547
|
Quote:
Americans really shouldn't take for granted the unalienable rights and protections their government and constitution gives to individuals. American really is the most free and liberal country in the world, socially at least. I'm quite envious myself. Ireland has an archaic blasphemy law that now apparently is being used for a model for legislation in Islamic Theocracies in the world! |
|
08-08-2010, 09:40 PM | #633 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
It never ceases to amaze me how much people like to think that a 51/49 issue or something similar is somehow decided. In my mind, anything short of 80/20 deserves some serious introspection.
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
08-08-2010, 10:21 PM | #634 |
Dread Mothy Lord and Halfwitted Apprentice Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 10,820
|
The question is, does a unilateral veto qualify as "serious introspection."
__________________
Crux fidelis, inter omnes arbor una nobilis. Nulla talem silva profert, fronde, flore, germine. Dulce lignum, dulce clavo, dulce pondus sustinens. 'With a melon?' - Eric Idle |
08-08-2010, 11:57 PM | #635 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Hmmm...might not even get to the Supremes- which, given the 4-4 split with everything depending on Kennedy, might make both sides happy.
The compromise which everyone might be able to live with would be to find some way to keep the ruling applying to California only. http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...INEO1EOV71.DTL
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-09-2010, 07:06 PM | #636 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
judicial creationism ...
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/art...ng_106652.html As a judge, I can make up what I wish. That's why there are other judges and Supreme Court judges.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
08-10-2010, 04:07 AM | #637 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
I mean they'll come out against it if asked the question, but nobody seems to be eager to be the one identified with leading the opposition. Compare this to what it would have been like even 5 or 6 years ago. While public opinion in the US may still be against, people are uneasy about being too outspoken- it's too easy to get identified with the bigots. Looks like Mexicans and Muslims are the new gay.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
08-10-2010, 04:16 AM | #638 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
From inked's link:
Quote:
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
08-10-2010, 04:55 AM | #639 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
And, yes, Gwai, I know Plato would not have approved of gay marriage.
I wonder what Matthew Frank thinks about gays in the military?
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
08-10-2010, 07:45 AM | #640 |
Best Ex-Administrator ever
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 60,547
|
Plato, yeah, because he never got anything wrong, or leave a legacy that profoundly retarded western thought for a few thousand years, or advocate ideas that now would be regarded as extreme tyranny. Nope, he's a god who rules all our opinions.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
marriage | katya | General Messages | 384 | 01-21-2012 12:13 AM |
Homosexual marriage | Rían | General Messages | 999 | 12-06-2006 04:46 PM |
Gays, lesbians, bisexuals | Nurvingiel | General Messages | 988 | 02-06-2006 01:33 PM |
Ave Papa - we have a new Pope | MrBishop | General Messages | 133 | 09-26-2005 10:19 AM |
Women, last names and marriage... | afro-elf | General Messages | 55 | 01-09-2003 01:37 AM |