01-29-2006, 10:41 PM | #41 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
Amazing that this thread is still going at this late date.
For me, in the end, it comes down to this: The world is a mirror. Yes, it's possible to view Gandalf as a cunning manipulator and the hobbits as his expendable baggage. It's also possible to see Gandalf as an immortal demigod who selflessly assumed the pains and aches of mortal flesh to teach, lead, and save, someone to whom friendship is a high value indeed worthy of faith and trust. I just can't help myself - I see Gandalf as the latter. [Edited to soften the point.] Last edited by Jon S. : 01-29-2006 at 10:44 PM. |
01-30-2006, 01:44 AM | #42 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LI-woods, NY
Posts: 653
|
Quote:
He is not human - a spirit in human form, sent by the High order, and therefore his idea about ME dwellers expendability is quite in tune with those who sent him:to serve the "common goods" as THEY understand them. Gandalf is brilliant, shrewd and scary person, because all human's feelings are alien to him, he can fegn love and affection to manipulate person, but in reality he has none. Absolutely all his actions were deliberate and had a double bottom, but when time comes to lay down on sacrificion table his own life in the name of the quest, he does it like a true soldier (or android), without hesitation, just the same way as he sends on sure death, without any remorse and wavering, people who love and trust in him. Quote:
|
||
01-30-2006, 01:35 PM | #43 | |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Quote:
I think the hobbits were taken on the Quest neither because of their friendship with Frodo, nor because they insisted on going. Here Olmer is right. Sentimental reasons were not part of the decision. It was simply practical. And I believe, Gandalf's did have foresight about their future role in the quest, at least a strong feeling that they were needed. He foresaw that Gollum was vital to the quest, and some of Gandalf's words make us think that he knew what for and when he will be needed. In Mordor and at Orodruin. So why couldn't he have similar foresight about Merry and Pippin? No, he didn't take them as two spare ring-bearers. He knew they had another role. Without the two fools, Isengard would not be destroyed. Without Merry the Pellennor battle would have been lost! I think Gandalf foresaw that. And note, Elrond had similar foresight that they were needed in the Shire. And he was right! But Gandalf had more power and foresaw more. He knew of their future importance in the quest. |
|
01-31-2006, 07:50 PM | #44 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
The Numenor-discussion is split off and moved into a single thread: The drowning of Numenor.
This thread is to discuss the reasons for having Merry and Pippin in the Fellowship.
__________________
We are not things. |
02-07-2006, 04:45 AM | #45 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
The side discussion about the Valar, Maiar and Men has been split of and moved here where it is better suited. And now I like everyone here to stay on topic.
__________________
We are not things. |
02-11-2006, 12:21 PM | #46 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Why have Merry and Pippin in the Fellowship?
I like to think they were included for comic relief.
With Frodo all noble and burdened down and the elves, wizards, etc. all heavily invested with morality and good and evil, these two were just "every Hobbit" and showed the faults and peccadellos of everyone.
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
10-19-2007, 07:32 PM | #47 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: montana
Posts: 41
|
I think, If Merry hadn't been there, Eowyn wouldn't have defeated the witchking of Angmar, and Pip, believe it or not, actually helped in the mines of moria. Think about it, if gandalf hadn't fell, He wouldn't have become Gandalf the white, and Pip also signaled Rohan by lighting the beacons when denethor refused. And I have to agree that because of them the ents went to war against Isengard, and Rohan survived. What would have happened if there was no Gandalf the White? Gandalf the gray lost against Saruman the first time, but as Gandalf the White, he beat him the second time in Rohan.
|
10-19-2007, 09:09 PM | #48 |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
Foresight is definitely my pick for the reason. Foresight, and providence. Merry and Pippin were meant to be in the Fellowship, as was seen by later events.
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
10-19-2007, 09:26 PM | #49 | |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Quote:
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
|
10-20-2007, 04:09 AM | #50 | |
Leaf-Crowned Lord Of Elvenpath
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven by the looks of it. Hell by the feel of it.
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
Also, it would have been easier and swifter if the Valar had stormed Barad-Dùr, molten the Ring, and with justice swooped around telling everyone it was them who bothered to come down to ME, and thus earning the worship of all the Free Peoples. It would have been better publicity for them, but no, they agreed the folks to do it themselves. And too much worship results to too many prayers.... The Free Peoples had to "grow up."
__________________
Hers. |
|
10-20-2007, 05:43 PM | #51 | ||||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LI-woods, NY
Posts: 653
|
Quote:
Gandalf can foresee nothing, his argument on an inclusion of Merry and Pippin was a tight friendship between hobbits. In it he was putting his hopes for success(I already said about the real reason). Nevertheless in whole escapades of the hobbits their friendship played a little part in Frodo's quest, since they became separated and each went on his own way. If it's not for Gandalf's return (which he did not forsee either) Pippin would end as a helpless catatonic, and Merry would be Theoden's chore boy at best. Quote:
Quote:
And who said that in Valinor it would be better than in Middle Earth? Valar themselves? Why they have to drag elves out of their home? Because they did not have enough of servants over there? Seems many of Moriquendi have asked the same question and refused the invitation to the gilded cage. Quote:
__________________
Uruk-hai, or the journey to there. Last edited by Olmer : 10-20-2007 at 05:47 PM. |
||||
10-21-2007, 05:01 AM | #52 | |||
Leaf-Crowned Lord Of Elvenpath
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven by the looks of it. Hell by the feel of it.
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Hers. |
|||
10-21-2007, 09:29 PM | #53 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 455
|
As someone who's constantly Monday morning quarterbacks NFL coaching decisions, I realize I'm a bit hypocritical now saying here that there sure is an awful lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on here regarding Gandalf and Elrond's selection of Merry and Pippin for "the team." Sure, certain negative consequences resulted from the choice. There were also quite positive consequences and none of us knows how worse the outcomes might have been had anyone else been chosen in their stead.
|
10-24-2007, 08:42 AM | #54 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
It seems to me that the last four positions on the Fellowship were really just "filler". Gandalf, Aragorn, and Frodo were chosen for obvious reasons. Sam was picked because of his loyalty to Frodo and Boromir was probably asked to stay in Rivendell and leave with the rest of the Fellowship to keep news of Aragorn and the Ring from reaching Gondor too soon (though surely this wasn't the reason told to Boromir).
As for the rest, Legolas and Gimli originally only agreed to stay with Frodo to the crossing of the mountains, so their addition doesn't seem particularly important. And Elrond's decision to include Merry and Pippin really seems like a "well,... ok,... whatever" type thing, doesn't it? There were two open spots remaining (always seemed a bit overly coincidental), they wanted to go, Gandalf spoke up for them, and off they went. Last edited by CAB : 10-24-2007 at 08:44 AM. |
10-24-2007, 12:31 PM | #55 |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Hello, CAB - great you are back! You have been missed.
Yes it looks like the extra hobbits were mostly "filler". But on the other hand, Elrond couldn't really send someone of power - Glorfindel for instance. Nazgul could have overlooked three hobbits in the Emin Muil and Dead Marches and in the Morgul Vale, but no way they would have overlooked the shiny Glorfy. As for Legolas and Gimli, I have a suspicion that they were included because Thranduil and Dain respectively have requested it. Thranduil must have suspected that something very important was going on. Aragorn brought Gollum to Mirkwood, Gandalf questioned (and tortured ) him there, then the ranger and the wizard left, seeming much preoccupied, and asked Thranduil to guard the prisoner. I think the Mirkwood King grew suspicious of all these goings on and resented being kept in the dark. So he sent his own son to investigate and take part in what was about to happen. As for Dain, it was Sauron himself who warned him that a "little ringy" was wanted. I bet Dain felt that the Elves were concoting something again so he sent his trusted advisor Gloin to Rivendell. |
10-24-2007, 04:41 PM | #56 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 306
|
Hello Gordis, and thank you.
You gave some good reasons for the inclusion of Legolas and Gimli in the Fellowship. I hadn't considered the political angle with them. I think you're right. Staying with the political theme may also help explain why there was room for Merry and Pippin on the Fellowship. Why were none of Elrond's people chosen for this journey? As you stated the shiny, resurrected Glorfindel couldn't go, but surely someone else from Rivendell could. Noldorian Elves had been sneaking around Middle Earth quite well for thousands of years. Maybe Elrond could have volunteered "so and so" who was one of his best scouts and was very familiar with the lands south of Rivendell or "such and such" who was often a guest of the Moria Dwarves in years past (since Gandalf said he had considered going through Moria before the quest ever started and probably shared this thought with Elrond). The answer may be political. As the Fellowship turned out there was no question that Gandalf was the leader and Aragorn was next in line. But what if a high status Noldorian Elf had been a member? Would this have caused a power struggle in Gandalf's absence? It is quite possible, I think. And if Aragorn had ended up following this person to Minas Tirith his claiming of Gondor's crown would certainly have proven much more difficult. |
10-24-2007, 05:26 PM | #57 |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
Very good points, CAB, indeed.
Moreover, some Noldorin Elves - if not most of them - didn't really wish to help actively or to risk going to Mandos poste-haste. Gildor Inglorion is a good example . Then again, few of the Noldor were not also Calaquendi Elves, so in the Spirit-world they would be as shiny as Glorfindel. As for the Sindar, maybe Elrond didn't consider them much trustworthy when dealing with the One. And in the actual fellowship the Elf was balanced by the Dwarf (who could have thought they would become fast friends?). |
10-25-2007, 04:10 AM | #58 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Here's my two cents.
Don't forget that LOTR is about Hobbits. Specifically, it is about hobbits "growing up" and taking their place in the world: Quote:
Now, Frodo and Sam, both ring-bearers, end up taking ship and leaving Middle-Earth. So it's not them who "grow up", Sam and Rosie going at it like rabbits notwithstanding; they make the ultimate sacrifice to save the Shire. It is Merry and Pippin who provide the leadership necessary to kick Sharkey out of the Shire. Remember Gandalf's parting words: Quote:
|
||
10-25-2007, 04:22 PM | #59 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: montana
Posts: 41
|
??????????? Sam never left on the ship to leave middle earth. He stays behind remember? I don't remember exactly what frodo said but it went something like this "Even though you bore the ring, even if for a little while... My dear sam, you can not always be torn in two, you must be one and whole..." I've read The Hobbit, FOTR, TTT, ROTK, and seen all three movies. In the book and the movie, Sam returns home to Rosie after watching the ship dissapear that bore frodo.
|
10-25-2007, 05:25 PM | #60 | |
Lady of the Ulairi
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minas Morgul
Posts: 2,783
|
It is in LOTR Appendices.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What All Was Wrong with PJ's LOTR | Wally | Lord of the Rings Movies | 425 | 08-14-2016 08:43 AM |
Meryy and Pippin - their importance to the fellowship | Landroval | Lord of the Rings Books | 16 | 02-25-2006 12:12 AM |
Character Analysis: Frodo, Sam, Merry and Pippin | Telcontar_Dunedain | Lord of the Rings Books | 1 | 09-19-2004 06:56 AM |
If Merry and Pippin had returned to the Shire | IronParrot | Lord of the Rings Books | 21 | 06-28-2003 11:39 AM |
Pippin at the Black Gate | kennebecc | Lord of the Rings Books | 19 | 01-13-2002 08:14 PM |