02-03-2002, 05:14 PM | #41 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Merry old England
Posts: 413
|
It could have gotten all the hair from the Dwarves' beard and sewn them into wings! Yeah! *shuts up when he starts getting odd looks*
It can happen! *runs*
__________________
Take up the White Man's burden-- The savage wars of peace-- Fill full the mouth of Famine, And bid the sickness cease; And when your goal is nearest (The end for others sought) Watch sloth and heathen folly Bring all your hope to nought. |
02-04-2002, 11:02 AM | #42 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 608
|
lets sort this out for good this time!!!!!!!
BALROGS AND WINGS: FOR AGAINST If it had wings it wouldn't As a Maiar it could have have fallen down would it? changed shape to have wings, but not been able to fly. The book says it had fiery wings, But not actually wings. IT'S ALL A MATTER OF PERSONAL CHOICE- AND AT THE END OF THE DAY IT DOESN'T MATTER! BALROGS ARE REALLY SCARY, FIERY CREATURES, THEY DON'T NEED WINGS BUT YOU CAN GIVE THEM WINGS IF YOU LIKE!!!!!!! |
02-04-2002, 02:39 PM | #43 | |
Best Ex-Administrator ever
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Ireland
Posts: 60,547
|
Quote:
|
|
02-04-2002, 04:54 PM | #44 |
Bard of Mangled Songs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West of Middle Earth...oh alright...Manila
Posts: 2,679
|
Don't you just love the Professor? He left enough loose and not so loose ends to keep people mooting.
__________________
Power attracts the corruptible. Absolute power attracts the absolutely corruptible. -Missionaria Protectiva, Frank Herbert Accio, Ash Nazg! Elennuru s?*la lúmenn' omentielvo (The Death Star shines on the hour of our meeting) - Darth Arathorn Put aside the ranger... Start looking for Mumakil action figures... |
06-08-2002, 03:12 PM | #45 |
Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lothlórien
Posts: 3,419
|
Okay. This thread is months old, but I want to throw my stone on the non-winged side of the scale. If I started another thread, it would be closed. So... I wrote a paper that was supposed to defend one side of an issue for English. Here it is. Bear with me, I had to do a little explaining for the nitwits.
For fifty years, Tolkien lovers everywhere have debated the infamous question: do Balrogs have wings? J.R.R. Tolkien created the Balrog, an evil and fiery demon from the depths of the world, for his masterpiece, The Lord of the Rings. The Balrog is described as being "like a great shadow, in the middle of which was a dark form, of man-shape maybe, yet greater; and a power and terror seemed to be in it and go before it...in its right hand was a blade like a stabbing tongue of fire, in its left it held whip of many thongs." But do Balrogs have wings? Tolkien says that "The shadow around it reached out like two vast wings", but are the wings real, or merely shadow that looks like wings? It is my belief that the wings are merely figurative. After all, Tolkien tells us that they are "like two vast wings". This is a simile that that the writer used to create an image of towering shadow in our mind. Farther on, the Balrog's "wings were spread from wall to wall". However, Tolkien has already established that the wings are not literal; only wing-like shapes. Therefore, it seems obvious to me that the Balrog, however evil, is utterly wingless in every regard.
__________________
There's antimony, arsenic, aluminum, selenium... |
06-08-2002, 04:24 PM | #46 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 6,975
|
I think the Balrogs had wings, I almost sure they had. But I don't think they could fly with them... (agree with Agburanar)
|
06-08-2002, 09:36 PM | #47 |
Viggoholic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,749
|
I agree with Elf Girl's post. After rereading the part on the Balrog, I have to the conclusion that Balrogs don't have wings. They are not real wings, just a description. This debate will probably never end, but its fun debating it!
__________________
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. |
06-08-2002, 09:52 PM | #48 |
EIDRIORCQWSDAKLMED
DCWWTIWOATTOPWFIO Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Littleton, CO
Posts: 1,176
|
Have to agree with CBG on this one. this is totally inconclusive, and it is absolutely certain that the Master left this dichotomy in for people to hash over time and again. His meticulous editing process would not have missed this dissonance in such a harmonic masterwork. Folkses will argue from now til doomsday whether Balrogs gots wings. For me, I have always visualized Balrogs pretty much as the one in the film, and think Alan Lee got the viualization right [wasn't he the one who designed this Balrog?].
I see your point, Elf Girl, regarding simile versus objective statement, but Professor Tolkien, again, would not have left that shift in conceptualization remain in the books if he had not wanted to leave the issue intentionally vague. And, mayhaps, as Gandalf stood and saw one of his childhood playmates gone horribly wrong approaching acroos the bridge at Khazad-Dum, those wihtout Maiar or Elven sight might have been asking themselves, "are those wings there? or what the freaking heck ARE they?" I imagine had one polled the remaining fellowship in Lothlorien, you would have gotten a result similar to this: Does Balrogs gots wings? FOR: 2 AGAINST: 2 DON'T KNOW: 3 NOT VOTING: 1
__________________
"...[The Lord of the Rings] is to exemplify most clearly a recurrent theme: the place in 'world politics' of the unforeseen and unforeseeable acts of will, and deeds of virtue of the apparently small, ungreat, fogotten in the places of the Wise and Great (good as well as evil). A moral of the whole (after the primary symbolism of the Ring, as the will to mere power, seeking to make itself objective by physical force and mechanism, and so also inevitably by lies) is the obvious one that without the high and noble the simple and vulgar is utterly mean; and without the simple and ordinary the noble and heroic is meaningless." Letters of JRR Tolkien, page 160. Last edited by bropous : 06-09-2002 at 01:31 PM. |
06-08-2002, 10:12 PM | #49 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Well, what cast the wing-shaped shadows, if there were no wings?
Hah! HAH!
__________________
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.” –Bertrand Russell |
06-08-2002, 10:46 PM | #50 |
Slacker
Warrior Admin Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alabama
Posts: 2,759
|
I can see both sides of this issue, buy I say that Balrogs had wings for two reasons:
1. He spread his wings from one wall to the other. Period. 2. They would look so much cooler if they had wings. You never know. I might change sides after I read over it and think about it a little.
__________________
"If the giving of information is to be the cure of your inquisitiveness, I shall spend all the rest of my days in answering you." Gandalf to Pippin Psalm 107:31 |
06-09-2002, 03:25 AM | #51 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 6,975
|
in second thought:
maybe it had one wing and one hand or two wings and two hands? because he lash with his whip... or he did this with his wings? |
06-09-2002, 05:54 AM | #52 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tring, Herts, England
Posts: 582
|
I'm not sure whether this is good evidence or not, but my SFX magazine has an advert for Games Workshop collaborating with New Line Cinema, and the picture of the Balrog definitely has wings. I will see if I can scan the picture at a later date (when my ******* scanner is working!)
__________________
Entmoot Resident Bard #2 Wielder of the shiny fire extinguisher Worshipper of the divine cheesecake Hamsters and Rangers everywhere, rejoice!!! Minsc, Baldur's Gate 2 Children, don't take drugs. Become a pop star, then people give them to you for free!!! - Billy Mack, Love Actually. While I'm sure the nice people from the local archery club meant well, a moment's consideration would have made them realise that giving my friend and I lethal weapons was probably not a good idea! Dammit, eyeliner and dreadlocks should not be that sexy! |
06-09-2002, 08:47 AM | #53 | |
Lurker
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lothlórien
Posts: 3,419
|
Quote:
__________________
There's antimony, arsenic, aluminum, selenium... |
|
06-09-2002, 06:50 PM | #54 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
I'm with wings.
Firstly, they don't have to be functional wings. To follow this, you could then postulate that the wings were of a shadowy/phantom element. Secondly, wings are cool. Thirdly, they were spread from wall to wall. If they were non-functional shadow wings (well, semi-functional, since they could be used like a cat makes it's fur rise... as a scare tat tic.) then they still exist, and were spread, but they were not REAL, solid wings. Wings of fire and shadow, if you will. That is all.
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
06-09-2002, 07:09 PM | #55 |
Númenorean
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,050
|
Balrogs have wings. I dont care what anybody says, but balrogs have wings.
__________________
Why can we not be sober.. |
06-09-2002, 07:35 PM | #56 | ||||||
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
||||||
06-09-2002, 07:38 PM | #57 |
Queen of Nargothrond
Administrator Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Akron, Ohio - USA
Posts: 7,121
|
Since the professor left us with this mystery, I say that if you think that Balrogs have wings, then they have wings. If you think they don't have wings, then they don't have wings. Btw, Do Elves have pointy ears?
Oh, and even though this is an old thread, I think it belongs in the ME forum. Moving. |
06-10-2002, 06:57 AM | #58 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
To wing or not to wing... Well I don't care that much for it, but it's a nice perpetual debate. I'm not sure which of these two options it's going to be, but it takes but a little to adjust my mental image of the balrog. Although I do favour wings for the nice and shallow reason that's the balrog is more impressive that way, shadow wings are okay too. But if he had real wings, I sincerely doubt them being functional. If the wings were to carry a balrog they must have been enormous, bigger than enormous really, gigantic's better. Or even beyond that. Anyway, you get my point, I hope.
__________________
We are not things. |
06-10-2002, 08:32 AM | #59 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dorset
Posts: 608
|
Quote:
__________________
I would wish, were it to any avail, that the LORD OF THE RINGS FILMS had never been wrought. ROLLING STOCK, WE'RE ROLLING STOCK!! |
|
06-10-2002, 09:13 AM | #60 | ||||
The Original Corruptor
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,881
|
Having just finished lunch, I feel that I am morally obliged to insert mine 2 cents into this fiasco, because if I don't, the world will end, and I won't be able to enslave anyone.
[frowns]*Scratches head*[/frowns] Now then, where was I? Alright, let's take a few statements from a book called LotR... Quote:
Quote:
The darkness assumed a shape. The shape of wings. We know that when the thought of a demonic creature comes to mind, we sometimes (if not most of the time) picture it with some type of wings. Whether the wings can be used is of no consequence - it is merely an addition to the rest of the image to make it look more "demonic". Now, the balrog, I'm sure many would agree, is a prime candidate for "demonic creature", as parallels are drawn between the type of being: spirit of fire, powerful and terrifying, and the concept of demons from hell, eternal fire, terror, etc. I would say that Tolkien wished to draw from the reader's conceptual image of a demonic creature, to reinforce the interpretation of this creature in the way that Tolkien wanted people to see it; to equate thoughts of "hell" with this being of fiction. Therefore, of all shapes to intentionally compare the shape of the transformed darkness/shadow, wings would be the most suitable choice. Also, since the Good Book says "...the shadow about it...", we should not ignore that the shadow/darkness surrounded or encompassed the "dark form, of man-shape". From this, it would be silly to assume that, if the balrog had wings, they were folded behind it, and when the wings were unfolded, the shadow of (or darkness of) the wings was extended. Silly, because if the wings were folded up behind it, obviously the shadow/darkness of the wings would too be behind it, not encompassing it. Additionally, we know that the balrog was a man-shape, surrounded by shadow, and has the ability to manipulate fire and shadow. Let's go back to the sentence "His enemy halted again, facing him, and the shadow about it reached out like two vast wings." The balrog was manipulating shadow, to induce fear. If a man-shape was detected - amidst the shadow - why weren't wings detected? Well, they might have been folded to such an extent that they were not at all visible behind the frame of the balrog, or perhaps the shadow made so much of an impact on the physical boundary of the balrog that anything behind the frame would be indeterminable/indestinguishable from shadow. But then, if the man-shape (physical) was discernable against shadow, physical wings would also have been discernable, because they would have been separate from the shadow. We know this because, if we again assume there were wings, without the "wings" unfolded there was still shadow surrounding the man-shape. This would imply that if the wings became unfolded, there would be an additional shadow (of the wings). Quote:
Quote:
It reminds me of Junior School english classes, were we learnt about similes and metaphors. Examples: [Simile] The cloud looked like an anvil. [Metaphor] The anvil exploded in a thunder shower. [Simile] ... the shadow about it reached out like two vast wings. [Metaphor] ... its wings were spread from wall to wall. That is all that I have to say about that. Never forget, however, that I.EAT.FLESH. Huzzah! Last edited by Andúril : 06-10-2002 at 09:19 AM. |
||||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A question to ponder | Ælfwine | Middle Earth | 13 | 10-18-2004 02:38 AM |
Unofficial Hobbit Question Thread | Yodaman | Lord of the Rings Books | 2 | 06-14-2004 11:35 AM |
balrogs | den | Middle Earth | 22 | 10-30-2003 08:10 PM |
The nature of Balrogs | Captain Stern | The Silmarillion | 17 | 02-26-2001 10:01 AM |
Question for Mr. Jackson | Fat middle | Lord of the Rings Movies | 9 | 07-19-2000 04:36 AM |