12-21-2003, 05:26 AM | #41 | |
Alcoholic Villain-Fancying Elf Pirate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Lyonesse
Posts: 4,547
|
Quote:
Oh, and again, I actually liked the thing with Frodo sending Sam away. I thought it worked.
__________________
Eruviel Greenleaf in a past life. "Whoever has come to understand the world has found only a corpse, and whoever has found a corpse is superior to the world." -The Gospel of Thomas SQUAWK! |
|
12-21-2003, 05:43 AM | #42 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
I didn't mind the Frodo-Sam thing so much. I thought it was an odd change, but at the same time, it was well done and I don't mind it.
I don't understand why it occurred, but it worked well enough I suppose. However, it's deviations like that that decrease its success as an adaptation. Overall, though it was a highly enjoyable movie, LotR was not a successful adaptation.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-22-2003, 01:29 AM | #43 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 19
|
I believe he meant crack that Jackson was smoking.
|
12-22-2003, 10:22 AM | #44 |
Peer of the realm of Sanguine
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Hill, Marlton, NJ
Posts: 798
|
Of the three movies, this was, in my opinion, the best adaptation. It may be that I had a different set of expectation regarding changes, but as far as a movie goes I thought it was well done. I don’t have a problem with anything that was deleted, it’s over 3 hours and 20 minutes for goodness sake, but I did have issues with additions. I thought that Gollum’s attempt to turn Frodo against Sam was OK, and the appearance of the Mumak battalion at the Pelennor was superb. I thought the Legolas-as-Spiderman routine was a little corny.
__________________
“"I am the friend of bears and the guest of eagles. I am Ringwinner and Luckwearer; and I am Barrel-rider," Fear Complacency! ___________________ Something under the bed is drooling |
12-22-2003, 05:47 PM | #45 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
If Ioreth is not in the Entended Edition, I will be upset. For now all I can say is, wrong idea to leave out the Houses of Healing. Very bad move. What's the point without Ioreth? Can just any old Dunedain come walking in and claim to be King? Though I shouldn't give more material to movie bashers, I will just wait till November.
I have to throw a link to a great essay Michael Martinez wrote about the Wise in which he mentions the scene that I am refering to: http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/tolkien/71710 Well, maybe only indirectly.
__________________
cya Last edited by Elfhelm : 12-22-2003 at 05:57 PM. |
12-22-2003, 07:08 PM | #46 |
Sapling
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7
|
-well it sure was interesting to see shelob sting frodo wearing a mithrill shirt, and marry and pipping being not realy taller at the end of the movie (:
best movie ever for a long time to come |
12-22-2003, 09:36 PM | #47 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
In the book (though I haven't read RotK for a while) I believe she's described as stinging Frodo in the back of the neck, where the mithril shirt would not reach of course.
Since they included the Entdraught in the extended edition, Merry and Pippin should have been taller. Good noticing. I believe this has been mentioned before, but no one made a big deal over Eowyn and Merry slaying the Witch-king. They also recovered from their wounds impressively and unnaturally quickly. If the Houses of Healing isn't included in RotK extended edition, that will not make sense. (It already doesn't, but EE could repair the damage anyway.)
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Nurvingiel : 12-23-2003 at 04:00 AM. |
||
12-23-2003, 01:34 AM | #48 | |
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
Read this:
Quote:
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen |
|
12-23-2003, 03:59 AM | #49 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Oh my goodness, that's almost everything they missed! No wonder it's about 5 hours long (apparently).
So what are everyone's conclusions so far? I feel that, though the movies are visually stunning and beautiful, they are not very good adaptations. I will probably not deviate from this viewpoint with future viewings of the movies. The way I would describe a successful adaptation would be the book in film form, or as close as humanly possible. Before I saw any of the movies, I gave Jackson full marks. Watching the movies, each major or pointless deviation detracted from its success. This would include (in no particular order) the Flight to the Ford, the omission of Saruman and the Scouring of the Shire (from RotK), the omission of the shortcut through the Old Forest, Gimli and Pippin's more unfortunate lines, and many parts of the battle of Helm's Deep, among others. Small details such as pointless differences with the book in the battle in Moria at Balin's tomb, or the omission of Gandalf's letter to Frodo about Aragorn. I did enjoy the movies immensely, and they were visually stunning. Arwen (the movie character) was very beautiful, but nothing like her character in the book. Dark hair, being Elrond's daughter, beauty, and love for Aragorn are not enough to make her character successfuly adapted from the book. Likewise the movie, though beautiful and well-done in many parts, the movie was overall not a successful adaptation.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-23-2003, 05:23 AM | #50 |
Viggoholic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,749
|
I'm confused, Nurvingiel. How could you give Peter Jackson full marks before you have seen the films?
__________________
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. |
12-23-2003, 05:09 PM | #51 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
I should have elaborated on that a little.
Before I saw it, I knew of no mistakes. I gave it full marks because of this, but when I watched the movies and saw deviations from the book, I knew there were mistakes and started taking off "marks", which eventually led to me concluding it was a failed adaptation. The full marks thing was my way of going into the movie with an open mind.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
12-23-2003, 07:24 PM | #52 |
The Lovely Hobbit-Lass
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Bounded in a nut-shell
Posts: 1,593
|
Well, I went into the theater fearing the worst (because I was extremely dissapointed when I saw the Towers). I was, however, pleasantly surprised. I was a bit miffed at what they cut out, but even more amazed at how much they crammed into the amount of time that they had. The biggest problem I've got with it is the whole Shelob deal (Frodo leaving Sam included). The whole thing is sooo much better in the book- and what isn't??- but I think it was a silly decision to change it from the book. I missed Sam getting to beat the crap out of Gollum and Shelob. His "Drop him" growl was the best part of the whole thing. I was sooo dissapointed that he had no good-bye speech to poor Mr. Frodo. Much to short.
Other than that and no Houses of Healing, I was rather pleased with the whole movie. Simply a beautiful job on everyone's part. I do indeed think it was a very successful adaption.
__________________
It's New Years Day, just like the day before; Same old skies of grey, same empty bottles on the floor. Another year's gone by, and I was thinking once again, How can I take this losing hand and somehow win? Just give me One Good Year To get my feet back on the ground. I've been chasing grace; Grace ain't so easily found One bad hand can devil a man, chase him and carry him down. I've got to get out of here, just give me One Good Year! |
12-25-2003, 04:59 PM | #53 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 123
|
Well, I believe it was a good adaptation (not a great one though)
So to start with the good: 1) I liked Minas Tirith 2) The battle scenes were good (except from Legolas...) 3) The hobbits 4) Theoden's part 5) Minas Morgul I disliked: 1)When entering the paths of the dead (Aragorn, Legolas and Gimli) the horses flee in terror. I think that PJ should emphasize the loyalty of those horses. 2)Denethor eating 3)I missed Mouth of Sauron 4)I think PJ presented Faramir weaker than he is. 5)Reduced the power of the Nazgul since Mery and Eowyn don't seem to suffer much (Mery even goes to the black gate to fight) 6) The palantir thrown in the water 7)on March 6 Dunedain and Elladan and Elrohir don't show up (Aragorn doesn't get the banner) And... I hated: 1)Gandalf beating up Denethor 2)Arwen-scenes (especially the one with the baby ) 3)The Scouring of Shire missing 4)Frodo sending away Sam Anyway, despite these I really enjoyed the movie |
12-28-2003, 04:41 AM | #54 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
12-29-2003, 01:13 AM | #55 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: KY
Posts: 217
|
I loved ROTK.
I was not expecting to see the book, exactly as it was written, up there on the screne. The time it would take to do that is staggering, and it's over 3 hours as it is. I can't wait to see the extended version, as many of you have mentioned, I too miss the house of healing, among other things. I wish they could have filmed the scourging of the Shire, but since I was aware it would be absent I wasn't disapointed. (I was very sad when I saw "Fellowship" because I hadn't heard Tom bombadil was cut!) These are movies based on Tolkien's work, and I think they do an admirable job. I shudder to think how they would have ended up if some slob of a hollywood director had gotten ahold of them and completely butchered them. I have seen so many movies that have nothing to do with the books they supposedly are based on. Peter Jackson, in my opinion, has kept the feeling of the books intact. Yes, he has changed things, mostly for time considerations, and I do not always agree with those changes. But everytime I see one of these movies I have a great time. I haven't had this much fun at the movies in a long time. I was suprised that Denethor was so wacked from the get go, in the book he's a jerk, but doesn't flip out until Faramir is hurt. But I have to admit that the scene with him eating and Pippin looking aghast is very compelling. I have often read of calvary overunning infantry, but I've never seen it, and it was beautifully done in this movie. I could watch that scene over and over. I'm arachniphobic, Shelob scared the pants off me and there I was in front of god and everyone with no pants! I'm not sure how I feel about Frodo ordering Sam off. In my opinion, that would never happen. But perhaps Peter jackson felt he had to show more of how much the ring was effecting Frodo so folks who have not read the books weren't completely suprised when Frodo claims the ring. Frodo going over the edge in Mt. Doom was a bit hollywood, but not nauseatingly so. Dang, but that actor playing Faramir is cute! I hated Orlando Bloom when I saw him in the first movie, but he has really grown on me. I think I was predjudiced because he wasn't what I had pictured. I hope we see more of him and Gimli in the extended version. Hmm.... I wonder what's on my signature, I havn't posted in so long!
__________________
"They have called me that ever since I said yes to an elder Ent before he had finished his question" -Quickbeam This post property of Entmoot. |
12-29-2003, 06:44 AM | #56 |
Greatest Elven woman of Aman
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Having way too much fun with Fëanor's 7
Posts: 4,285
|
I like the movie as a movie, but it doesn't work for me as a good adaptation of the book. It is too many deviations and omissions.
__________________
--Life is hard, and then we die. |
12-29-2003, 05:07 PM | #57 | ||
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
I think a lot of you are forgetting the key word here. ADAPTATION!
Adaptations are NOT literal interpretations of books. So when I see people above saying it wasn't a successful adaptation because of changes it makes me smirk. It's sad, yes I know, but change in adaptations are practically required. Ask any screenwriter or even pick up a big time screenwriting book that discusses adapting books to film. In fact I will give you a quote from one of my books, which by the way is one of the most popular screenwriting books out there. This is from a chapter on Adaptation: Quote:
Quote:
P.S. I also think they did a good job by picking certain things that were said in the books, but attributed them to other characters and made them work.
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen Last edited by Dúnedain : 12-29-2003 at 05:16 PM. |
||
12-29-2003, 08:43 PM | #58 |
Bard of Mangled Songs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West of Middle Earth...oh alright...Manila
Posts: 2,679
|
One thing I noticed as I watched it more times is that many of the big scenes felt more action-hero driven than epic. For instance, I was expecting the big Aragorn screne to be shown from the point-of-view of Gondorians and Rohirrim in battle and their initial despair at seeing the black sails of the corsairs AND THEN being much surprised to see the the standard of Aragorn. The film-writers wanted to focus on the 3-action stars right away. The quick intercutting made that long stretch between the lighting of the beacons up to the time the One Ring is destroyed feel action-hero driven as well but I did like the charge of the Rohirrim and the Eowyn moments.
I guess successful adaptation is a personal thing: it is different for each person who views the films and depends largely on their expectations. Mine was based on both my personal experience on the books and the first 2 films. The 3rd film suddenly felt like the glaring/obvious liberties taken suddenly multiplied.
__________________
Power attracts the corruptible. Absolute power attracts the absolutely corruptible. -Missionaria Protectiva, Frank Herbert Accio, Ash Nazg! Elennuru s?*la lúmenn' omentielvo (The Death Star shines on the hour of our meeting) - Darth Arathorn Put aside the ranger... Start looking for Mumakil action figures... Last edited by Arathorn : 12-30-2003 at 12:11 AM. |
12-29-2003, 10:35 PM | #59 | |
Elf Lord of the Grey Havens
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 2,381
|
Quote:
__________________
There exists a limit to the force even ther most powerful may apply without destroying themselves. Judging this limit is the true artistry of government. Misuse of power is the fatal sin. The law cannot be a tool of vengance, never a hostage, nor a fortification against the martyrs it has created. You cannot threaten any individual and escape the consequences. -Muad'dib on Law The Stilgar Commentary |
|
01-03-2004, 04:36 AM | #60 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
I didn't feel that the spirit of the book was maintained. Not all the "made up" scenes were departures from the spirit or intent of LotR, but there were too many that were completely off. Also, as was previously pointed out, focusing on action at key points, and leaving Saruman's story arc unfinished scuppered any success they might have had at a good adaptation. Because there were many excellent, Tolkien-spirited scenes, it is still halfway decent.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROTK : EE version Mooter reviews! | Rían | Lord of the Rings Movies | 100 | 02-13-2006 11:59 AM |
The ROTK 5-Disc Platinum Series freebies (what to do, what to do...) | Arathorn | Lord of the Rings Movies | 15 | 01-03-2005 02:00 AM |
RotK: EE Sneak preview | Andúril | Lord of the Rings Movies | 44 | 12-07-2004 05:20 PM |
ROTK Trivia | Indril Anarion | Lord of the Rings Books | 986 | 11-22-2004 01:43 PM |
Another ditty on the faithfulness of the adaptation, this time with some Oz parallels | IronParrot | Lord of the Rings Movies | 4 | 03-26-2000 07:35 PM |