10-26-2004, 02:22 AM | #41 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In the Land of Oregon Where the Cherries lie. . .
Posts: 27
|
I believe it all comes down to two things:
When life begins? and What makes human life wrong to end? You may think the second is a given, that everyone believes it is wrong to end a life, so why bother with the why, but the why is everything in this context. I mean, how many of us are vegetarians here? Probably at least one of us, I guess, but most of us probably eat meat or use products from "dead animals." I live on a farm and am within a quarter mile of cows we plan to kill in two months and then eat and I don't have any moral qualms about it. However, I do have moral "qualms" about killing my brother (even when he deserves it.). Why the difference? Because I believe human beings have an immortal soul, mainly. I think humans are granted a precious gift called life. I believe in some cases it is forfeit. If a man tried to kill me and I had a gun, I'd shoot him, no bones about it. I don't want to die, and I think if I could I would kill to save my life. However, let's leave that out of the conversation for now and just assume that for some reason it is wrong to kill an innocent human. So, why do you pro-choice people think it is wrong to start killing off your next door neighbors? Why do we have laws against murder? I can't see any other reason than that humans have something special about them. It is something that defies definition. And I think conception is the only reasonable place for this something to join with a human being to make it a human being. The birth of a soul, if you will. Viability has increased over the years. In my own state babies have survived from incredibly pre-mature ages. These children are only partially developed at the point they are "severed" from the womb. I'd say they are very much human. However, they are also at the same age when a child in the womb can be legally aborted. What is the difference between one or the other? If a nurse so much as pulled the plug on that baby's incubator, causing death, or if the parent did so, they would be prosecuted, would they not? So what does being within the mother do to make the child different? I have heard the word parasite used to describe such a little passenger. However, parasite or not, he is still a human (Many brother-in-laws are parasites, and I can't get a hunting license on them.). A human parasite perhaps. Perhaps dependent on a mother, but when is an infant not dependent? If you left an infant alone in a room for long enough and ignored it, it would die. If you left it on the street it wouldn't last an hour. A parent who leaves a child in the park to fend for itself would be prosecuted because that child is dependent on them. A feutus is dependent on the mother. The only specification is that for nine months the feutus is dependent on no one but ther mother, as opposed to an infant who can be passed off to the government or a relative or another set of parents. But, if a mother gave birth while on a camping trip for some odd reason and didn't want the baby, would she be justified in leaving it in the middle of the forest to die? Let's say she is a week's journey away from someone to hand it to. We would expect her to keep it for that week, would we not? If she didn't, wouldn't we call it murder? Why can't we expect her to keep it for nine months prior? Dependency makes no real difference. Then there is the amount of cells. This would be an argument that a man born with no arms is less of a man than one with arms because there is less there as far as cells goes, isn't it? I mean, you ask where to draw the line, when you say "two split cells or six" but I ask you, why not 1,000 or 1,000,000. What difference does the number of cells really make? Less identifiable, but when do you think that something enters a human? What truly makes it wrong to kill a human being? I'd like everyone to answer that question, if they would. |
10-26-2004, 05:56 AM | #42 | |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Quote:
Several years ago, a guy at work said something like: "I don't understand why people get so upset about abortion. Why don't those who are against it just not have them and let those who are not against it have them?" Struck by sudden inspiration (the one time in my life I knew what to say just then), I replied, "That's what people used to say about slavery." Rian has a very good point. When we're talking about these options, it's obvious that pro-abortion means allowing the option of abortion, and anti-abortion means being opposed to the use of abortion. Pro-choice and pro-life (terms which to this point I have scrupulously used - I'm reconsidering), are just euphemisms which cloud the issue. What would we think if 150 years ago, the terms in the slavery debate had been 'pro-choice' and 'pro-free'?? Nobody would be pro-abortion in EVERY case... that EVERY pregnancy should have to be terminated by abortion, unless someone was working toward our own extinction... so it's a given that we're talking about favoring the option when desired, when we say 'pro-abortion'. Using 'pro-choice' simply allows us the luxury of talking around a very unpleasant issue (a form of denail, perhaps?).
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
|
10-26-2004, 05:58 AM | #43 | |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Quote:
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
|
10-26-2004, 08:44 AM | #44 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
10-26-2004, 09:08 AM | #45 | |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Quote:
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
|
10-26-2004, 09:42 AM | #46 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Brownjenkins and Valandil,
Ahh, the crux of the matter: how do we define the beginning of life? In my career the definition changed form the standard "moment of fertilization" to "implantation" in my field of medicine. This was to facilitate the use of pre-implantation embryonic cells post-fertilization. Did this in fact change anything about the nature of life's beginnings? No. It merely provided a paradigm shift to allow research. If we look historically at definitions of life in various societies, we can report that Sparta did not recognize a newborn baby as a person until it was judged fit. Those that weren't fit were exposed on a specific location to their deaths. The practice of terminating pregnancy, or at least attempting to so do, was rife enough in the Greco-Roman world that Hippocrates included a provision in his physicians oath "I will not give a pessary to a woman to procure abortion." This clearly implies a group of persons who did so. Not all physicians are subscribers to the Hippocratic Oath as original today (for instance, the Hippocratic Oath forswears poisoning, mercy killing, surgery for kidney/bladder stones, sexual predation, and patient confidentiality viiolation). When we get to the 4th century, the definition becomes "quickening" - when the mother senses the movement of the fetus. This is the point at which at that time the soul was thought to enter the body. The state of affairs was pretty much there to the advent of embryological study and the development of the microscope and its application to the issue. Then we see the discovery of the union of the egg and the sperm into the zygote (from which all subsequent development occurs). So, as was memorably testified on Capito Hill, "When does life begin? The life of your puppy or kitten begins when fertilization occurs according to the veterinarian textbooks. How can it be that human life begins later than that of other animals" - to the best of my recollection, of course, reaching way back. As to the legal status of life definition, the determination of its end has been subject to change with the advent of technologies (lack of motion and breathing, absence of heart beat after the stethescope, onset of putrefaction, flatline EKG, and brain death determination in the face of functional heart). And you can see how in reverse these markers have been used to define life: onset of heartbeat, motion, respiration, brain wave activity. So legally the definition has been variable. And let's not forget the legalization of destroying walking, talking, breathing aggregations of fully grown post-partutition cell aggregates that were legally terminated under the Third Reich as "life unfit to live" including Germans and Jews. So when does life begin? It would appear that medically we have pushed the frontier to the most recessive point for humans when we say that prior to the union of the sperm and egg and initiation of the zygote, there is not life. After the union of the sperm and egg into the zygote, the initiation of life is present and observable in the processes of development. I cannot escape the reality that post-fertilization the spark we call life is present. This means to me that life begins at fertilization and is present from there forward. This is a definition of absolute minimal requirement. Of course, some will note the reality of parthenogenesis in some animals. This means that under certain conditions female lower animals/insects can reproduce without requirement for sperm and have offspring. So one could make an argument that life is possible if only an egg is present. But I would argue that doesn't apply to humans. We know of no such occurences in human reproduction or the higher animals. Note that I have arrived at a minimalist definition of life from a medical data standpoint and stand well within human reasoning in so doing. This is not a legal definition, however. In accord with that understanding, when I rtreat a pregnancy, I have two (occasionally more!) patients. Then one gets into the concept of triage and valuation of other factors than the mere definition of life in management of pregnancy. But MY starting point is that I am dealing with two (or more) lives and I ACCORD both value.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
10-26-2004, 10:10 AM | #47 |
Warrior of the House of Hador
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,651
|
If someone in hospital who rely's on machines to keep them alive then surely a fetus who is relying on their mother is alive to.
__________________
Then Huor spoke and said: "Yet if it stands but a little while, then out of your house shall come the hope of Elves and Men. This I say to you, lord, with the eyes of death: though we part here for ever, and I shall not look on your white walls again, from you and me a new star shall arise. Farewell!" The Silmarillion, Nirnaeth Arnoediad, Page 230 |
10-26-2004, 11:59 AM | #48 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
10-26-2004, 12:01 PM | #49 |
Magnificent Master of Buckland
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Buckland, U.S.A.
Posts: 1,138
|
I know I should focus on the Why you believe what you believe thread right now, but I can't resist posting! http://www.americancatholic.org/News.../YU/ay0194.asp
Teens who did abortion and others who chose differently and their reactions.
__________________
But it is the way of my people to use light words at such times and say less than they mean. We fear to say to much. It robs us of the right words when a jest is out of place. -Meriadoc Brandybuck Is there anything I can do that wouldn't inconvenience me?.-Adrian Monk Hogan: What's a definate factor that we can count on? Newkirk: We don't know what we're doing. Do you wanna split a pineapple? -Shawn Spencer |
10-26-2004, 12:07 PM | #50 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
my point, contraception, morning after pills, late-term abortion and even late-in-life mercy killing are all the destroying of "life" in a broad scientific sense much like IRs war and capital punishment examples... the question is not the black and white idea of whether or not it is ok to destroy "life"... but rather, when is it okay to destroy life
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
10-26-2004, 12:11 PM | #51 |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
So... we have no recourse but to convert you guys to evangelical Christianity??
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
10-26-2004, 12:33 PM | #52 | |
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
Quote:
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
|
10-26-2004, 12:43 PM | #53 | ||
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
Quote:
Quote:
You can't have it both ways! Personally, I think one-person-one-vote is the safest and fairest way. EDIT - edited for clarity - I'm not saying Brownie uses this argument
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! Last edited by Rían : 10-26-2004 at 03:51 PM. |
||
10-26-2004, 12:46 PM | #54 |
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
And as far as personal experience - when I was 6 months pregnant with our second child, an ultrasound revealed that his legs were only little stubs. We were told that we could get an abortion, and some people couldn't understand why we wouldn't. This happened just after Christopher Reeve's accident. I pointed out that our child was able to move his arms and legs, and that this gave him more mobility than Christopher Reeve, and should we consider killing Christopher Reeve?
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
10-26-2004, 01:29 PM | #55 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
10-26-2004, 01:36 PM | #56 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Slow down and I sail on the river, slow down and I walk to the hill
Posts: 2,389
|
Quote:
I choose to call myself "pro-life" instead of "anti-abortion" because I am staunchly against making all abortion illegal. Certain methods (such as partial birth...ugh), yes, but not all. "Anti-abortion" gives the air of "we should make abortion illegal because then the problem will go away." I'm not saying that's what YOU'RE saying, but that's what many people, especially pro-choice, would see. Also, pro-life is a personal thing, and not an all encompassing thing (in my eyes). Having never been in a situation that would cause me to face this choice, I say that I would not have an abortion unless I had an ectopic pregnancy. edit: I don't think abortion can be compared to slavery. If we do make abortion illegal, like we made slaverly illegal, can you imagine the surge of back-alley abortions? They're are extremely unsafe, and then you risk more than just the life of an unborn child, but also the mother, who is probably scared and alone.
__________________
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.” –Bertrand Russell Last edited by Starr Polish : 10-26-2004 at 01:37 PM. |
|
10-26-2004, 02:39 PM | #57 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
*lurks*
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-26-2004, 02:41 PM | #58 |
Elentári
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: South Africa
Posts: 727
|
Abortion is not the answer. I believe that there will always be another way, you just have to search for it.
|
10-26-2004, 02:47 PM | #59 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 516
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-26-2004, 03:02 PM | #60 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
at the present time a majority seem to be willing to allow abortion... if this changes, the laws will change as i like to say... right and wrong are relative to the society we live in
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Religion and Individualism | Beren3000 | General Messages | 311 | 04-17-2012 10:07 PM |
Abortion and Handguns | Aeryn | General Messages | 256 | 01-31-2003 01:39 AM |
Abortion | Gwaimir Windgem | General Messages | 9 | 01-28-2003 11:05 PM |
Let Gandalf smite the Abortion thread! | Gilthalion | General Messages | 7 | 08-27-2000 02:52 PM |
Abortion | dmaul97 | Entmoot Archive | 83 | 08-27-2000 01:25 PM |