10-14-2005, 12:08 AM | #521 |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
When's the last time you saw a fish produce milk for their young? I call that a function similarity for whales and humans. And if the form of the DNA follows functions like this, that's a logical explanation.
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
10-14-2005, 12:18 AM | #522 |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
Those are functions DNA <i>causes</i>. But you have to concede that proportional to the degree of functional similarity between whales and fish, they have very low degree of DNA similarity, while proportional to their functional similarity to us, they have a high degree of DNA similarity.
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
10-14-2005, 12:20 AM | #523 |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
Warm-blooded, produce milk, have hair...these are all characteristics of mammals, and both humans and whales share them. Fish have none of these, and they even swim differently. (Side to side instead of up and down)
[It's getting late, and since Rian's here, I think I'll log off now...can you cover for me, Rian?]
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) Last edited by Curubethion : 10-14-2005 at 12:22 AM. |
10-14-2005, 12:26 AM | #524 |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
I think you're messing up causes and effects, but I'm tired (I didn't eat until 7 pm today, it being Yom Kippur) and I can't thread it out right now. Basically, DNA CAUSES the form AND the function, in the end, so you can't really say that "form following function explains it". That, and DNA similarity IS a function of relatedness - look at my children, they will have MORE SIMILAR DNA to me and my wife than to any other humans... and be next most similar to those humans next closest to them in blood... it comes from how DNA is transfered from generation to generation, and it is provable. Hence, it IS a proof of how related species are.
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
10-14-2005, 12:31 AM | #525 |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
It can be from relatedness, sure, but that isn't necesarily the only cause. And here's my form vs. function argument: if two animals do almost identical things, then the DNA coding for those things will be very similar. Just like there are graphics engines that apply a universal graphics code to several video games...
[I really should go to bed now...]
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
10-14-2005, 08:51 AM | #526 | |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
Quote:
you don't, for instance, have some insects with feathers and jointed wings
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
|
10-14-2005, 01:12 PM | #527 | |
Quasi Evil
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Maryland, US
Posts: 4,634
|
Quote:
__________________
"People's political beliefs don't stem from the factual information they've acquired. Far more the facts people choose to believe are the product of their political beliefs." "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." |
|
10-14-2005, 03:19 PM | #528 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Environmental factors also affect phenotype; how much depends on the species. It is certainly the case with trees. A good* phenotype often indicates a good genotype, but this is not always the case. How many dead branches remain on the trunk of a Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) depends on the density of the stand and on genetics. The microsite (the environment directly around and under the tree) can affect growth, tree health, tree form, etc.
* By "good", I mean "expressing qualities desired by people"
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-14-2005, 04:24 PM | #529 | ||
Friendly Neigborhood Sith Lord
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,080
|
scientific variables again,
__________________
I was Press Secretary for the Berlioz administration and also, but not limited to, owner and co operator of fully armed and operational battle station EDDIE Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-14-2005, 05:47 PM | #530 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
Western redcedar (Thuja plicata), is much less locally adapted, though it does have genetic differences. For example, the amount of thujoplicins* that occur in the tree's sapwood is influenced, as far as we can tell, completely by genetics. Obviously environmental factors like soil, climate, weather, slope, topography, elevation, percipitation, etc. etc. are also highly variable. Characteristics of a species are affected by genetics and environment on a continuum that ranges from 100% genetics to 100% environment. * Thujoplicins are a chemical compound that prevents disease and rotting in the sapwood, and also puts deer off eating the foliage if it occurs in high enough amounts.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-14-2005, 10:49 PM | #531 | ||
Friendly Neigborhood Sith Lord
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,080
|
i like your stuff about trees like this, i never thought about trees having genetics and stuff, but it makes sense; on the other hand i didn't know trees had emotion either but seriously it is quite interesting, especially to me and curub cause we live in kansas and there are, sadly, very few trees
__________________
I was Press Secretary for the Berlioz administration and also, but not limited to, owner and co operator of fully armed and operational battle station EDDIE Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-14-2005, 11:35 PM | #532 | |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
Quote:
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
|
10-15-2005, 01:11 AM | #533 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
Tree genetics are really imporant in forestry. Breeding programs can actually improve tree volume or make them more resistent to pests among other things. The pedigree of trees in these programs is tracked, just like a rancher tracking the pedigree of his cattle. The rancher and the forester do this for the same reason - if a tree is pollinated by a tree it's closely related to, this can cause genetic problems and a disruption in the breeding program. Kansas has a lot of grasses! I love grass. And they have genetics too. And I didn't just say the ranching analogy just because you're from Kansas - it's just a good example.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-15-2005, 02:36 AM | #534 | |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
Quote:
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
|
10-22-2005, 09:38 PM | #535 |
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
If it's not expressed, it's not important to survival and therefore it is unrelated to natural selection. So maybe it was made similar with an intent and purpose..(hint, hint...)
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
10-22-2005, 09:50 PM | #536 |
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
But what intent or purpose would it have if it is not expressed? Sorry, argument falls down for you too.
And junk DNA is most likely (in my view) DNA that used to have a purpose and doesn't anymore - that is, it has evolved away from having a purpose. Why would a supposedly intelligent designer put in purposeless parts? By contrast, it makes sense for DNA to possibly stop being expressed (by the evolution of the enzyme that snips away junk DNA) over a long evolutionary period.
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
10-22-2005, 10:08 PM | #537 | ||
Fenway Ranger, Lord of Red Sox Nation
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: College!
Posts: 1,976
|
Ok, but wouldn't some organisms evolve ways to not even have the DNA in the first place? Furthermore, evolution is based on DNA mutation, not non-expression.
If any DNA isn't needed anymore, it's because the function it used to code for has changed, coming from a mutation in the DNA. However, then this DNA which supposedly mutated would be the very DNA that's not needed anymore! The argument self-contradicts. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Adventure...betrayal...heroism... Atharon: where heroes are born. My wife once said to me—when I'd been writing for ten or fifteen years—that I could always go back to being a nuclear engineer. And I said to her, 'Harriet, would you let someone who quit his job to go write fantasy anywhere near your nuclear reactor? I wouldn't!' (Robert Jordan) |
||
10-22-2005, 10:13 PM | #538 | ||
Word Santa Claus
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,922
|
Quote:
Quote:
I really should point out here that I am not an expert on junk DNA, since I'm not a practicing biologist. But I still fail to see why junk DNA would be MORE likely to be a sign of "intelligent" design than of evolution - as I've just proposed an evolutionary mechanic for it, and it doesn't seem intelligent.
__________________
Sufficient to have stood, yet free to fall. |
||
10-23-2005, 04:21 AM | #539 | |||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Quote:
But maybe this DNA is useful later in possible beneficial mutations (in which case it would have a good chance of passing this on), or harmful mutations, in which case it might not even germinate. (Thus ending the possibility of someone inheriting the harmful mutation.) I agree that junk DNA would point more to evolutionary process.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
10-23-2005, 11:12 AM | #540 | |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Quote:
Yeah, how do you think we got ENTS?
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homosexual marriage II | klatukatt | General Messages | 736 | 05-15-2013 01:15 PM |
Mel Gibson's Jesus movie | IronParrot | Entertainment Forum | 242 | 05-26-2005 01:46 AM |
Animal morality: are humans merely animals? | Rían | General Messages | 284 | 01-18-2005 04:12 PM |
Evidence for Creationism and Against Evolution | Rían | General Messages | 1149 | 08-16-2004 06:07 PM |
Offshoot discussion of "what religion are you" thread | Rían | General Messages | 2289 | 01-08-2004 02:31 AM |