|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-28-2003, 11:17 AM | #21 | |
Hobbit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On an Ent
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
I said I don’t care if they win the Oscars, because they are not LotR. Not the same thing you are saying, is it?
__________________
I'm bad, no really... QUOTES: “We made a promise to ourselves at the beginning of the process that we weren't going to put any of our own politics, our own messages or our own themes into these movies. What we were trying to do was to analyze what was important to Tolkien and to try to honor that. In a way, we were trying to make these films for him, not for ourselves. “ PJ “Obviously we're taking this incredible novel and we're adapting it into films, and I think the film is the important thing. “ Peter Jackson on The Today Show, December 5, 2002 |
|
06-28-2003, 11:35 AM | #22 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Tolkien's England where the tale grew in the telling...
Posts: 330
|
Quote:
Your first quote was Quote:
However, if I did get it wrong, what did you mean exactly? Last edited by LutraMage : 06-28-2003 at 11:37 AM. |
||
06-28-2003, 01:28 PM | #23 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On an Ent
Posts: 29
|
Are they entertaining movies? Yes, they are reasonable sword & sorcery movies and I enjoyed them.
Are they truly LotR? No, they are inspired in tLotR but are not LotR. Are they classics that I would feel it as an injustice if they don’t win the Oscars? No. But then, I don’t enjoy only Oscar material.
__________________
I'm bad, no really... QUOTES: “We made a promise to ourselves at the beginning of the process that we weren't going to put any of our own politics, our own messages or our own themes into these movies. What we were trying to do was to analyze what was important to Tolkien and to try to honor that. In a way, we were trying to make these films for him, not for ourselves. “ PJ “Obviously we're taking this incredible novel and we're adapting it into films, and I think the film is the important thing. “ Peter Jackson on The Today Show, December 5, 2002 |
06-28-2003, 01:42 PM | #24 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
"quote"
Are they truly LotR? No, they are inspired in tLotR but are not LotR ......so the books are LOTR but nothing else is? or do you think other movies are real and LOTR, TTT,ROTK are fantasy?........ ...................."reality, what a concept".........
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
06-28-2003, 03:27 PM | #25 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On an Ent
Posts: 29
|
No, calling something LotR doesn’t makes it LotR.
If they don’t do the same thing they do in the book, if they don’t speak the same lines they do in the book, if their personality is not the same of those in the book, they cannot be the same, can they? Calling them by the same names doesn’t make them the same. Logic, Mr. Spock, logic.
__________________
I'm bad, no really... QUOTES: “We made a promise to ourselves at the beginning of the process that we weren't going to put any of our own politics, our own messages or our own themes into these movies. What we were trying to do was to analyze what was important to Tolkien and to try to honor that. In a way, we were trying to make these films for him, not for ourselves. “ PJ “Obviously we're taking this incredible novel and we're adapting it into films, and I think the film is the important thing. “ Peter Jackson on The Today Show, December 5, 2002 |
06-28-2003, 03:32 PM | #26 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Nazgul King Squirrel
[B]No, calling something LotR doesn’t makes it LotR. If they don’t do the same thing they do in the book, if they don’t speak the same lines they do in the book, if their personality is not the same of those in the book, they cannot be the same, can they? Calling them by the same names doesn’t make them the same. Logic, Mr. Spock, logic. I completely agree and understand. However, I've yet to see a movie that was that perfect. Some are closer than others to the book version but none are exact. By your definition no movie is worth it?[ [URL=http://www.bellaonline.com/birding/photos/squi/squirrel.jpg[/IMG]
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." Last edited by Spock : 06-28-2003 at 03:47 PM. |
06-28-2003, 05:13 PM | #27 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 516
|
I haven't seen TTT (tho' I'll probably rent the extended edition DVD once it's out), but I did see FoTR. Could NOT care less if any of the LoTR movies win, but I have to say I'm surprised FoTR didn't win. The Oscars, after all, are not about quality or artistic vision. They are about box office and popular appeal.
As proof, here are three miscarriages of justice (there are many more, believe me): 2000 Best Actress: Julia Roberts for Erin Brockovich beat out Ellen Burstyn in Requiem for a Dream 1976 Best Picture: Rocky beat Taxi Driver 1964 Best Picture: My Fair Lady won instead of Dr Strangelove we curse the Academy, we do!
__________________
Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it. George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950) |
06-29-2003, 07:26 PM | #28 | |
Hobbit
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On an Ent
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Some directors want to make their movies as close of the original as they can. Sometimes we, the viewers, see their movies and see it as truly a version of the book, different, but close enough. Sometimes being close to the book is good, sometimes is not. Yet, sometimes the director don’t want to ”just” make the movie version of the book, and wants to tell a story, his story, based on the book. A valid option, and that is what I believe PJ did. By the way, nice squirrel pic.
__________________
I'm bad, no really... QUOTES: “We made a promise to ourselves at the beginning of the process that we weren't going to put any of our own politics, our own messages or our own themes into these movies. What we were trying to do was to analyze what was important to Tolkien and to try to honor that. In a way, we were trying to make these films for him, not for ourselves. “ PJ “Obviously we're taking this incredible novel and we're adapting it into films, and I think the film is the important thing. “ Peter Jackson on The Today Show, December 5, 2002 |
|
07-01-2003, 03:57 PM | #29 |
the greg the admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,101
|
I haven't been in this forum in a while...and now i see why. Too many damn purists.
Anyway, I do think the movie deserves to win many Oscars next year. |
07-01-2003, 04:25 PM | #30 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 6,975
|
I don't care, no... well, I do want them to win, but I won't be sad if they won't win.
|
07-01-2003, 05:48 PM | #31 |
Sapling
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ventura Ca
Posts: 6
|
i'm going to be sooo angry if ROTK doesn't win best picture, we already got robbed cause FOTR didn't win, a beautiful mind did. i know ROTK will be a nomination, and better win!
__________________
Andrew |
07-05-2003, 06:59 AM | #32 |
The Elvish Temptress
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,055
|
Of course I want LotR to win oscars but if not ... I won't die.
__________________
What I am and what I would are as secret as maidenhead. |
07-05-2003, 09:49 AM | #33 |
An enigma in a conundrum
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,476
|
Let's hope you're right and you don't die if TTT doesn't win.
As for your Cayman experience, sounds like it was a positive growth experience. Having been to those islands several times I find them delightful.
__________________
Vizzini: "HE DIDN'T FALL?! INCONCEIVABLE!!" Inigo: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." |
07-08-2003, 02:07 PM | #34 |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
I, for one, care about the movies winning Oscars.
Nobody's pretending that the Oscars are some kind of authority on what's good, bad and ugly on the movie scene in a given year. Nobody will ever agree with every single one of their choices (nor will they disagree with all of them), and everybody can point to a few years when the upsets were outrageous (Shakespeare in Love over Saving Private Ryan? A Beautiful Mind over both Moulin Rouge! and The Fellowship of the Ring?). But at the same time, nobody can deny that the Oscars have tremendous influence, and are important to the film industry in the same way box office tallies are. Simply put: if a risky, high-quality fantasy film wins a whole smackload of Oscars, the big production companies will be more likely to finance similarly huge fantasy projects, or future films by the same director. George Lucas got the money to do Star Wars because American Graffiti was such a hit with moviegoers and critics alike. It's a chain reaction: movie wins Oscars, movie makes more money, studios begin to wonder what that movie did right and start financing similar projects. The result: more good movies. Awards will also mean continued prestige for the films, though the impact is much bigger on smaller films than these big ones. There are many classic films I would never have stumbled upon had they not been rewarded with as many awards as they did in order to pique my interest. I was first introduced to Gone With The Wind because I was interested in how any film could possibly top The Wizard of Oz in awards in 1939. I heard of Cabaret because it was the film that very nearly beat The Godfather. This is how we remember movies like An American in Paris. More recently, this is how so many people were introduced to the sensation that was Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon - because it got a whopping ten nominations, a record for a foreign-language film. Last but not least, here's something specific to LOTR: if it nabs up a Best Picture, it will break the sci-fi/fantasy curse that put Annie Hall over Star Wars, Chariots of Fire over Raiders of the Lost Ark, Gandhi over E.T.. Nobody can deny that genre films - good genre films - have been marginalized. LOTR is the perfect film to break that trend, as well as the misconception that films like it are "popcorn movies" by default, when these few special ones are in fact far greater. Best of all: if the film wins Oscars, more people will read the book. Cases in point: I otherwise would never have read Mario Puzo's The Godfather or Margaret Mitchell's Gone With The Wind. On the other hand, LOTR could enter the pantheon of legendary films that didn't win (and arguably already has). Citizen Kane, Singin' in the Rain, 2001: A Space Odyssey - the list goes on.
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
07-08-2003, 10:04 PM | #35 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 215
|
Well said, IronParrot! I do hope they win the awards, and if they don't I do admit that I'll be rather disappointed. If they don't, it's not the end of the world. But the more awards, the more attention the movie gets. As the last movie in the trilogy, I truly hope that the Return of the King gets some awards.
__________________
Chickens at rest will stay at rest unless acted upon by an unbalanced force. Chickens in motion tend to cross the road. |
07-08-2003, 10:21 PM | #36 |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
Annie Hall! Ugh! Don't remind me!
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! |
07-09-2003, 12:31 PM | #37 |
The Original Amazonian Coconut
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Answering no questions, telling no lies.
Posts: 753
|
I think the movie itself is unworthy, but the soundtrack was truly marvelous.
Go Howard!
__________________
Hem, hem |
07-09-2003, 01:21 PM | #38 | |
The Elvish Temptress
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 3,055
|
Quote:
__________________
What I am and what I would are as secret as maidenhead. |
|
07-20-2003, 09:10 PM | #39 |
Master of Orchestration President Emeritus of Entmoot 2004-2008
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lost in the Opera House
Posts: 9,328
|
I can say this. The A.M.P.A.S. only(mostly) picks are biographical films, theres nothing wrong with that, but if rotk doesnt win there will be! I was sad for the losses of some of my favs though i.e...ghandi over e.t., annie hall over starwars,chariots of fire over raidersof the lost ark, terms of endearment over the mission, and so on....
p.s: i see my thread is in favor? |
07-29-2003, 11:00 PM | #40 |
Master of Orchestration President Emeritus of Entmoot 2004-2008
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lost in the Opera House
Posts: 9,328
|
Hi.
__________________
ACALEWIA- President of Entmoot hectorberlioz- Vice President of Entmoot Acaly und Hektor fur Presidants fur EntMut fur life! Join the discussion at Entmoot Election 2010. "Stupidissimo!"~Toscanini The Da CINDY Code The Epic Poem Of The Balrog of Entmoot: Here ~NEW! ~ Thinking of summer vacation? AboutNewJersey.com - NJ Travel & Tourism Guide |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HP Vs. LoTR | Pytt | Harry Potter | 53 | 01-17-2011 01:33 AM |
Blatant LoTR Copy-Cats | ItalianLegolas | Middle Earth | 81 | 08-13-2010 12:17 AM |
LOTR Discussion: Appendix A, parts 2 and 3 | Forkbeard | LOTR Discussion Project | 12 | 12-28-2007 07:10 AM |
LotR personality tests | Bombadillo | Lord of the Rings Books | 55 | 07-30-2006 09:55 PM |
Funny LOTR Insults | Haradrim | Middle Earth | 0 | 08-22-2004 01:19 AM |