12-26-1999, 06:30 PM | #21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: What should LotR be rated?
I agree with you Hernalt, except when it comes to your opinion of TPM!
|
12-27-1999, 12:46 AM | #22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: What should LotR be rated?
Psst! (whisper) My opinion of TPM is actually quite high... but I do get carried away sometimes... (/whisper)
|
12-29-1999, 07:54 AM | #23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
i think...
It would be much cooler with a R rating...they could have much more realistic violence... but theres no way thats happening... i mean how can you show a orc getting its head hewn by gimli with a pg13 rating? you can't really...
|
12-29-1999, 01:39 PM | #24 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: i think...
I think you could show Gimli hacking at orc necks and keep a PG-13, because an orc is a monster, not human.
|
12-29-1999, 01:48 PM | #25 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: i think...
Peter Jackson has stated, "These films will be PG13, but I would like them to be a hard PG13. The battles can't be BRAVEHEART violent, but we could maybe think about a slightly "harder" version for laserdisc release." That is of course, if laserdisc is still around then......
|
12-29-1999, 10:53 PM | #26 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: i think...
[wisper]ok then[/wisper]
|
12-30-1999, 04:40 AM | #27 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"wHisper"
[sigh]Tater, Tater, Tater......[/sigh] *shakes head*
|
12-30-1999, 07:28 PM | #28 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: "wHisper"
One pTater, Two pTater, Three pTater, Four...
|
01-04-2000, 04:37 AM | #29 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LotR's rating
Up here in Canada (eh) we have a much better ratings system than what your foolish American MPAA provides. It goes: G - Same as G in US. PG - Same as PG and most of PG-13. 14A - Same as either a high, high PG-13 or a low-to-middle-range R. 18A - R. R - NC-17. I'd say LOTR would definitely have to be 14A. That would likely end up R in the US, though... or as Jackson said, a "hard PG13".
|
01-04-2000, 07:05 PM | #30 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: LotR's rating
All I can say is this: if it gets rated 'R', my idiot mum will not let me see it. I'm hoping to God it's not. My mother is waaaaay overprotective.
|
01-04-2000, 11:24 PM | #31 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: LotR's rating
Have no fear Arwen....it is going to be rated PG-13
|
01-05-2000, 10:53 PM | #32 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
jerks
That's good
|
02-07-2000, 05:53 AM | #33 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: jerks
Ok here's my 0.02 cents. I think pg is a little to soft for things that happen in the story i.e. shelob,slaying orcs,sauron, "ect" Frankly an R is to high...this should be for children too... So I would go for a PG-13.....it's a good "Inbetweener"
|
04-07-2002, 07:24 AM | #34 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 146
|
Yes, let me see... I think thwe way they're doing it in the Uk is quite good-PG but not suitable for under 8's.
__________________
"A truth that's told with bad intent beats all the lies you can invent." |
04-07-2002, 07:32 PM | #35 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ithilien
Posts: 203
|
If it was rated R, I wouldn't be able to see it in the theater.
|
04-07-2002, 07:42 PM | #36 |
Viggoholic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,749
|
I think FOTR was rated M 15+ here which means (I think) that children under 15 have to be with an adult. I think it should be PG which means anyone can go see it, but is warns of violence etc. The TT will be rated PG or M 15+ cause of financial reasons. Obviously there will be no swearing, but maybe nudity in ROTK. *Blushes*
__________________
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HP Vs. LoTR | Pytt | Harry Potter | 53 | 01-17-2011 01:33 AM |
Blatant LoTR Copy-Cats | ItalianLegolas | Middle Earth | 81 | 08-13-2010 12:17 AM |
LOTR Discussion: Appendix A, parts 2 and 3 | Forkbeard | LOTR Discussion Project | 12 | 12-28-2007 07:10 AM |
LotR personality tests | Bombadillo | Lord of the Rings Books | 55 | 07-30-2006 09:55 PM |
Funny LOTR Insults | Haradrim | Middle Earth | 0 | 08-22-2004 01:19 AM |