Entmoot
 


Go Back   Entmoot > J.R.R. Tolkien > Lord of the Rings Books
FAQ Members List Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2002, 06:56 PM   #21
The Lady of Ithilien
Elven Warrior
 
The Lady of Ithilien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right here in between yesterday and tomorrow.
Posts: 357
I've read that when JRRT read that part to CS Lewis and others, they wept. It's one of the best, if not the best, scene in the whole book -- Sam is so human at that point, and his reactions so understandable.

I think Tolkien was setting Sam up for his greatest challenge that would come a bit later: giving the Ring back to Frodo. Thus, he had to first take the Ring.

When Sam gave the Ring back to Frodo (OK, he didn't just say "here it is" and plunk it in Frodo's hand, but he did lift the chain and Ring off before Frodo, crazed by the Ring, grabbed it from him), he became the first Ringbearer since Bilbo to give it up willingly, and unlike Bilbo, he had no help...just his love of Frodo. The really critical part was right after Frodo had grabbed the Ring back -- what would be Sam's reaction? With just about anybody else, it would have led to a terrible fight. Sam just knelt there with tears in his eyes, which besides showing that he himself had escaped the Ring's lure also brought Frodo back to his senses.

A little touch of love there in that awful tower at a moment when the Ring should have driven these two apart and betrayed them to its Master -- how wonderful! To lead up to it, it had to be stressed earlier that Sam's nature wasn't to leave Frodo, even if the Quest required it. Thus it was said, when he learned that Frodo was alive, he abandoned the Quest and chased after his Master. Yet the net effect was to save the Quest. Very complex, that.
__________________
Quote:
Thus one should consider: "Being angry with another person, what can you do to him? Can you destroy his virtue and his other good qualities? Have you not come to your present state by your own actions, and will also go hence according to your own actions? Anger towards another is just as if someone wishing to hit another person takes hold of glowing coals, or a heated iron-rod, or of excrement. And, in the same way, if the other person is angry with you, what can he do to you? Can he destroy your virtue and your other good qualities? He too has come to his present state by his own actions and will go hence according to his own actions. Like an unaccepted gift or like a handful of dirt thrown against the wind, his anger will fall back on his own head."
Buddha
The Lady of Ithilien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2002, 02:10 PM   #22
barrelrider110
Peer of the realm of Sanguine
 
barrelrider110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Hill, Marlton, NJ
Posts: 798
Gaffer Gamgee said:
Quote:
“‘Don't go getting mixed up in the business of your betters, or you'll land in trouble too big for you,’ I says to him [Sam].”
Up to now, Sam’s life had been ruled by proverbs such as this. He and his Gaffer were of uneducated rural stock who saw themselves more as servants, and generally not the type of people who used discretionary thinking. According to Gamgee, whether right or wrong this is the way of the world, and make no mistake about it, the world is a better place for it.

Sam’s choice went against his grain, because as he saw it, Frodo’s job was to cast the ring into the fire; Sam’s job was to help Frodo, not take over for him.

He reluctantly put on the ring because he believed Frodo was dead, and that being the case, there was nobody else to take the ring to Orodruin. When he discovered his error in thinking Frodo had died, he naturally beat himself up for jumping to conclusions.
__________________
“"I am the friend of bears and the guest of eagles. I am Ringwinner and Luckwearer; and I am Barrel-rider,"

Fear Complacency!
___________________
Something under the bed is drooling

Last edited by barrelrider110 : 12-30-2002 at 02:12 PM.
barrelrider110 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2003, 04:29 PM   #23
samwiselvr2008
Elf Lord
 
samwiselvr2008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hobbiton
Posts: 739
I think that Sam was being to hard on himself, at the moment when he left, what else could he have done? He thought that Frodo was dead! I always wondered why he didn't check Frodo's heart to see if it was beeting, like just see if you could fill it/hear it, but maybe Hobbit's and other races didn't know about it in that time period?
__________________
Jesus loves you!

Movie vewing count from the theater:
Return of the King:9
Two Towers: 11
Fellowship: 13

FRODO LIVES!
samwiselvr2008 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2003, 10:08 AM   #24
RosieCotton
Elven Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hobbiton...no wait....
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally posted by samwise of the shire
I think that Sam did what he did out of love for Frodo and out of love for The Shire. Let's suppose Frodo HAD died. If Sam took the Ring and destroyed it he would have had a better chance at seeing his master again, and if Frodo had been found with the Ring the Shire along with the whole of Middle Earth would have been doomed. I think that at that point in the Quest Sam had begun to realize he might never see Rose or Tom or Nibs or the Gaffer again, and so because he knew there might be that possiblity he took the Ring to safe those bcak home that he loved. And alot of times you have to do things you dont want to do to protect those you love who are indanger.
Sam's nature is a giving one, not caring about what happens to him but always making sure others were taken care of, and if he found he was indangering or hurting someone then he'd kick himself in the butt for it. Even with Gollum he tied the rope as loosely as possible so as to not cause any harm, and he HATED Gollum.
Sam is DEFFINITALY the COOLEST fictional character EVER. He's got a soft heart despite his riseliance(sp?)
Cheers,
Sam
Wow! Great post, and I couldn't agree more!
__________________
Fortune rides like the Sun on high
With the fox that makes the ravens fly
Luck his sould, the lightning his eye
He snatches the moons from out of the sky.
RosieCotton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2003, 02:07 AM   #25
LovesBeren
Sapling
 
LovesBeren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 7
Son of the Ol' Gaffer I Suppose...

Parenting has a lot to do with Sam being hard on himself. The Gaffer always puts him down. To me it's funny but sad when Sam refers to something about "What the Gaffer would have to say about it..." However, I don't feel the Gaffer's motivation is to belittle Sam. I think it's generational... it was the way he was raised too. It's reverse psychology where a parent tells their child they "won't amount to anything" so they hopefully go out try to prove you wrong. It might be questionable parenting...but the Ol' Gaffer no doubt loved his son.

Sam may also feel, although somewhat educated in "his letters," that he doesn't have "academic intellect" of Frodo and others of the fellowship. He's not ashamed, but feels he's out of his league. I think in this situation he based his decision based on what thought others (Frodo, Strider, or Gandalf) would do. Afterwards he realized it was not prudent to try to emulate those who are so wise and that he should just be himself... to relying on keen senses, gut feelings and heart and have proved faithful to him thus far. I feel the sharp self-analysis is because Sam very reflective thinker... a very good quality.. (I always admire the reflective thinking of the "Sam's" of the world...just wish they would change that "inner voice" from a parent berating to a kinder tone like a trusted counselor.)

Another thought... I think it is powerful lesson to all of us to be true to ourselves in challenging situations and not try to second guess ourselves and not be completely guided by doing what others might think we should do.

Tolkien always makes me think... what a joy!

LovesBeren
LovesBeren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2003, 01:45 AM   #26
cassiopeia
Viggoholic
 
cassiopeia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,749
I don't think Bilbo gave up the ring willingly (like Sam does later on in the story), it takes a lot of prodding from Gandalf before he releases the ring.

Gandalf says in the FOTR:
Quote:
'A Ring of Power looks after itself, Frodo. It may slip off treacherously, but its keeper never abandons it. At most he plays with the idea of handing it on to someone else's care – and that only at an early stage, when it first begins to grip. But as far as I know Bilbo alone in history has ever gone beyond playing, and really done it. He needed all my help, too. And even so he would never have just forsaken it, or cast it aside. It was not Gollum, Frodo, but the Ring itself that decided things. The Ring left him.'
Sam is remarkable in the fact that, later on in the ROTK, he takes the ring from around his neck and offers it to Frodo. Frodo then snatches the ring from him. Did Sam abandon the ring (but Gandalf says nobody ever does that) or did the ring abandon Sam (and why?)?
__________________
Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.
cassiopeia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2003, 03:40 PM   #27
Elf Girl
Lurker
 
Elf Girl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lothlórien
Posts: 3,419
I think the Ring abandoned Sam because it had done much more work corrupting Frodo than him.
Elf Girl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2003, 12:58 AM   #28
Quercus
Sapling
 
Quercus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
I think LovesBeren is on the right track, Sam was always sputtering about what the Gaffer would say. Sam was very fond of his dad and I think that the Gaffer was fond of Sam, but I don’t believe that he thought Sam was too terribly bright or reliable. Remember how skeptical the Gaffer was when they returned to the Shire? Frodo had a hard time convincing him that Sam had been an asset on the quest.

I think that a lot of Sam’s self doubt was a direct result of things the Gaffer had said to him. I also think that part of the reason Sam was so loyal to Frodo was because Frodo always praised Sam and had confidence in him.

Sam was a wonderful character, but let us not forget that in the end, he chose not to take the Ring to Mt Doom, he decided instead, to go back and stand guard over a dead body. Had the timing been different, Frodo, Sam and the Ring would have been captured! Whether by fate, or by accident, Sam ended up making the right decision twice.

I also think that Blackboar has a good point, it always seemed odd to me that Sam was so worried about someone defiling Frodo’s body and yet he didn’t make any effort to try and hide it.
Quercus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2003, 05:41 PM   #29
RosieCotton
Elven Warrior
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hobbiton...no wait....
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally posted by Elf Girl
I think the Ring abandoned Sam because it had done much more work corrupting Frodo than him.
I agree. Sam would have a much better chance of destroying the Ring at the Cracks of Doom than Frodo, because Frodo was already partially corrupted by it when Sam left him for dead. If Sam kept the Ring until the Cracks of Doom would he have been able to destroy it? I would say probably yes.

More on topic, I think Sam was very hard on himself. I mean, if he stayed, he and Frodo probably would have been killed by Orcs and the whole quest would have been in vain.

Rosie
__________________
Fortune rides like the Sun on high
With the fox that makes the ravens fly
Luck his sould, the lightning his eye
He snatches the moons from out of the sky.
RosieCotton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2003, 01:49 AM   #30
Quercus
Sapling
 
Quercus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally posted by RosieCotton
If Sam kept the Ring until the Cracks of Doom would he have been able to destroy it? I would say probably yes.
I’m not so sure about that. Sam had probably only possessed the Ring for a few hours before he started to have delusions of grandeur. It was his love for Frodo that made him resist the power of the Ring. Would he have had the fortitude to resist it’s temptation if his only goal were to destroy it? I think not.
Quercus is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Theology III Earniel General Messages 1007 07-02-2008 02:22 PM
Chapter 8 : The Potions Master Ireth Harry Potter 6 10-17-2006 09:13 AM
LotR Book IV, ch.9&10: Shelob's Lair and The Choices of Master Samwise azalea LOTR Discussion Project 20 11-06-2005 06:56 PM
Monty Python Meets LOTR Eruve Lord of the Rings Books 73 02-16-2005 08:43 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
(c) 1997-2019, The Tolkien Trail