02-17-2000, 03:11 AM | #21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re:
yes, thank you Elnor! :P heheheh
|
02-17-2000, 08:13 PM | #22 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Missing Link
Where's Nugent!?
|
02-17-2000, 09:45 PM | #23 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
ya, whatever.
:P |
02-18-2000, 01:22 AM | #24 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
Very funny...
Too bad ezboard are becoming more strict, you should have seen the fun to be had with strange table tags... |
02-18-2000, 01:25 AM | #25 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
The trick?
1)View source from your browser; 2)Learn html; 3)Go through the source. BTW, nice trick ben... |
02-18-2000, 01:26 AM | #26 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
<
Thanks
|
02-18-2000, 01:27 AM | #27 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
Yeah, I remember when I used to fool other boards with the <plaintext> tag combined with changing the font color to the background color. Nice trick as well, except now they have the option of turning off HTML.
|
02-18-2000, 01:29 AM | #28 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
OK, well the loophole I used was closed with the new version of ezboard, which is what I suspected, and why I made the thread the other day
The trick was to make the less than < sign and it would come out blank |
02-18-2000, 01:32 AM | #29 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Missing Link
Yeah... EZBoard had forgotten about opened tags and opened brackets...
With opened table tags, a whole forum could disapear! They repaired their mess quite fast... |
02-18-2000, 11:07 PM | #30 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
=)
|
02-19-2000, 01:50 AM | #31 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
It's too bad ezboard fixed the bug, this is a beautiful thing!!!
|
02-19-2000, 03:41 AM | #32 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We'll have to find a new way around it.
|
02-19-2000, 12:32 PM | #33 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
"It's too bad ezboard fixed the bug, this is a beautiful thing!!!"
And very unsecure! Good thing this EZCode trick: limits the number of html functionalities... But right now it's too limited (we can't even make nice lists with the ul or ol tags!) |
05-20-2000, 04:28 AM | #34 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
Heh. This thing still exists.
|
05-20-2000, 02:20 PM | #35 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
So it does.
Hehe, it took me forever to find it again. |
05-20-2000, 02:42 PM | #36 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
Yeah
I had a vague recollection of the number, I started at 200 and only had to go through 21 to get here |
05-20-2000, 04:01 PM | #37 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
*Sigh*
|
05-20-2000, 04:48 PM | #38 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
ho hum.
|
05-20-2000, 06:14 PM | #39 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
I bookmarked it, you see. I found it while clearing out my bookmarks.
Oh, and notice how since 5.3 introduced table borders, it uses the BORDER color now (on the blank space on the front page)? Maybe it's a default table background color on which all the cells are placed... I'll have to look at the source. Interesting way of doing it, methinks. |
05-20-2000, 07:06 PM | #40 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: =)
Now I´m here too. I admit I came here with the help of anduin´s clue and some guessing to what 221 refered to.
|