![]() |
![]() |
#21 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Or a dictionary! PJ's not a purist at all! A realy purist would have kept every important element from the book, maintained the depth and integrity of each character, and wouldn't have altered the plot in any way!
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
I'm sorry, I've run out of thesaurus'. Will a gumboot do?
Of course PJ's a purist. He's stayed true to his blood and gore roots. ![]()
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
Co-President of Entmoot
Super Moderator Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,397
|
Hee hee! You're right, it all depends how you want to define a purist, and what your perspective is.
In Time, I got the impression they were saying he was a Tolkien purist. Um... no. We're all purists and non-purists for different things.
__________________
"I can add some more, if you'd like it. Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to Punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look a lot of Tom-fools." - Sam Gamgee, p. 340, Return of the King Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ALL the rings | Insidious Rex | The Silmarillion | 7 | 10-02-2019 12:04 AM |
The Lord of the Rings discussion project | azalea | LOTR Discussion Project | 460 | 01-20-2008 11:35 AM |
Theological Opinions , PART II | jerseydevil | General Messages | 993 | 03-22-2007 05:19 AM |
The Lord of the Rings Discussion: Chapters 9 and 10 | Fat middle | LOTR Discussion Project | 57 | 05-21-2006 03:41 PM |