04-24-2003, 03:12 PM | #241 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
Ye ol' read only half the post syndrome.
__________________
cya |
04-24-2003, 03:30 PM | #242 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
Last edited by Black Breathalizer : 04-24-2003 at 07:00 PM. |
|
04-24-2003, 03:40 PM | #243 | |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
I'm only repeating myself because it was ignored. Sorry.
Quote:
For Aragorn the "church" is Gandalf. "Thou shalt defend the Church." Again, this would be Gandalf, with whom he collaborated in the defense of the North all the years leading up to the War of the Rings. "Thou shalt repect all weaknesses, and shalt constitute thyself the defender of them." See the Rangers thread over in Books. But especially, this is why he would not have sent a hobbit alone into the hands of The Enemy. "Thou shalt love the country in the which thou wast born." And isn't that exactly why he is so perplexed about whether he can serve it properly as King, and why we all want him to return? "Thou shalt not recoil before thine enemy." of course not "Thou shalt make war against the Infidel without cessation, and without mercy." The Infidel in this case is Orcs. "Thou shalt perform scrupulously thy feudal duties, if they be not contrary to the laws of God." Here is Aragorn's flaw and one driving force behind the whole story. "Thou shalt never lie, and shall remain faithful to thy pledged word." That's Aragorn! And Faramir, too! "Thou shalt be generous, and give largess to everyone." Which we'll see in scenes to come, hopefully. "Thou shalt be everywhere and always the champion of the Right and the Good against Injustice and Evil." of course
__________________
cya Last edited by Elfhelm : 04-24-2003 at 03:49 PM. |
|
04-24-2003, 04:01 PM | #244 | |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
Quote:
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! |
|
04-24-2003, 05:08 PM | #245 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
Aragorn did not permit Frodo to go alone. He acted on his principles until they brought him to an impass, then made a difficult decision.
__________________
cya |
04-24-2003, 05:18 PM | #246 | |
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Anyway, whatever one thinks about Aragorn's choice in the book, the sequence of events is quite different from that which occurs in the film. Of course, in the film, Jackson's Aragorn remains true to the form into which the Director has cast him: he wimps out again!
__________________
Mrs. M. "A Queen among farmer's wives" |
|
04-24-2003, 06:03 PM | #247 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
Exactly! And you know why? Because a man who makes millions catering to the bloodthirst of the public has no concept of chivalry.
__________________
cya |
04-24-2003, 07:25 PM | #248 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
You can give me excuses like "oh, it was Aragorn's chivalry," "But Merry & Pippin would have spilled the beans," "The danger to Merry & Pippin was more immediate," and on and on, but if all agree that everything pales in comparison to the quest of the Ringbearer, then there is NO difference. |
|
04-24-2003, 07:26 PM | #249 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
You always think the end justifies the means, and that's the whole difference.
__________________
cya |
04-24-2003, 07:51 PM | #250 |
The Insufferable
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,333
|
The real difference is that the film involves completely different characters, behaving in a completely different way, under markedly different circumstances.
__________________
Disgraced he may be, yet is not dethroned, and keeps the rags of lordship once he owned |
04-24-2003, 08:15 PM | #251 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: I have no idea.
Posts: 5,441
|
I actually came to this forum looking for something else, but found this thread and couldn't resist reading. Wow, we've got some different opinions here.
I'd like to just go on record as saying that it is quite impossible to follow the book when putting a movie together. A lot gets scrapped (ie, Tom B.) and some things get changed a bit. I was totally pissed about Arwen taking Frodo to the Ford, totally. And was not too happy that it is not made clear that Frodo is about 50 years old when he leaves Crickhollow, not the Shire. And I wasn't pleased about the little character changes, as well. But after I thought about it, in the end, I feel that the essence of JRRT was preserved. And I was alright with it. After all, wouldn't it have been a shame if someone else with less insight had taken up the cause and cast Tom Cruise as Aragorn (ick!). |
04-24-2003, 10:10 PM | #252 | |
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
__________________
Mrs. M. "A Queen among farmer's wives" Last edited by Mrs. Maggott : 04-24-2003 at 10:11 PM. |
|
04-25-2003, 12:21 AM | #253 | |
Dread Mothy Lord and Halfwitted Apprentice Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 10,820
|
Quote:
__________________
Crux fidelis, inter omnes arbor una nobilis. Nulla talem silva profert, fronde, flore, germine. Dulce lignum, dulce clavo, dulce pondus sustinens. 'With a melon?' - Eric Idle |
|
04-25-2003, 12:28 AM | #254 |
the Shrike
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Francisco, CA <3
Posts: 10,647
|
Can I insert a gratuitous farty noise right about here?
__________________
"Binary solo! 0000001! 00000011! 0000001! 00000011!" ~ The Humans are Dead, Flight of the Conchords |
04-25-2003, 07:42 AM | #255 |
Domesticated Swing Babe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Reality
Posts: 5,340
|
Ok, but no smell!
__________________
Happy Atheist Go Democrats! |
04-25-2003, 07:58 AM | #256 |
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 59
|
It is getting rather tiresome, but for the sake of clarity or understanding or whatever, I will reiterate that I found Tolkien's "reason" for Aragorn's desertion of Frodo not terribly excuseable either. Indeed, the first time I read the book, I was actually astonished at his decision. I later understood that Tolkien had to have Aragorn make that choice in order to develop the story in the way it was in fact developed. However, I recently was involved in a debate in which I was on the side that said Aragorn was in fact wrong to permit Frodo to go to Mordor without him. We won!
Of course, it was the "correct" decision in the end. Had Aragorn accompanied Frodo it would probably have been disastrous at least for Rohan and Minas Tirith. And then, too, we have the man's obvious prescience as already illustrated in his warning to Gandalf before the Company entered Moria. This may go some way to explain why he could make such a fatalistic statement as "the fate of the Bearer is no longer in my hands". Nevertheless, however questionable the book Aragorn's decision was under the circumstances in which it was made, the film's Aragorn's was worse under less excusable circumstances and for definitely less acceptable reasons. And for those reasons alone the two "decisions" are decidedly different although they produce the same result: Frodo and Sam going forward alone on the quest.
__________________
Mrs. M. "A Queen among farmer's wives" |
04-25-2003, 08:39 AM | #257 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
I do think that our "Aragorn's Parth Galen decision" discussion minimizes Frodo's role in this whole affair.
Frodo was chosen by the Council of Elrond as the Ringbearer, not Aragorn. Gandalf's and Aragorn's roles were to guide the Ringbearer, not lead him and tell him what he had to do. It was Frodo who made the decision (in both the book and the film) to go alone. Was it Aragorn's responsibility to stop him? Would Gandalf, Elrond, or Galadriel have counciled a different course? As Gandalf and Galadriel said, even the wisest cannot see all ends. It seems to me that one of the themes of Tolkien's book was that even the smallest person can make a difference. I can still recall the strong feelings I had when I first read the end of FOTR at age 14. I remember thinking, "how can Frodo DO that?!?!? How in the world can he THINK he can go to Mordor WITHOUT Aragorn and company to PROTECT him?!?!?!?" That is exactly what Tolkien wanted me to think. It was a very important aspect of the story to him. Jackson understood this and created the same emotions for his FOTR audience. I heard many people who had never read the books wonder how Frodo was going to be able to make it to Mount Doom considering how much he depended on the rest of the Fellowship throughout the first film. Chalk this one up as yet another example of Peter Jackson getting it right. Last edited by Black Breathalizer : 04-25-2003 at 08:40 AM. |
04-25-2003, 09:15 AM | #258 | |
Enting
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
Jackson's Aragorn is obviously concerned that he will be unable to resist the lure of the Ring at least at some point, if he continues to be involved with it. True, he "escapes" that temptation at Parth Galen, but at what cost? The cost of allowing Frodo to go off unguided, unaided and unprotected. Tolkien's Aragorn never has the problem and so the Ring plays no part in his eventual decision not to follow Frodo and Sam. Rather that decision is motivated by a belief that "fate" has decided that he is no longer responsible for Frodo and the Ring coupled with his very real obligation (as leader of the Company) to Merry and Pippin. In the end, Jackson brings about the same situation, but in a way that underscores either his lack of knowledge and/or understanding of the story or his boast that he could "tell it better" than Tolkien. Either way, the story loses.
__________________
Mrs. M. "A Queen among farmer's wives" |
|
04-25-2003, 09:49 AM | #259 |
Marshal of the Eastmark
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,412
|
Return of the King, Appendix A:
"It was said by Gimli that there are few dwarf-women, probably no more than a third of the whole people. They seldom walk abroad except at great need. They are in voice and appearance, and in garb if they must go on a journey, so like to the dwarf-men that the eyes and ears of other peoples cannot tell them apart." However, in Dungeon Magazine in the early 80's on the AD&D race of dwarves it was similarly declared that dwarven women were not inclined to go on adventures, and it was specifically stated that they had beards. Now that the AD&D thing has been added to the Tolkien thing by the screenwriters, I suppose it's not going to be questioned.
__________________
cya |
04-25-2003, 06:23 PM | #260 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: england
Posts: 22
|
surfer legolas????? the only theme that represented was to appease the "Xtream" kiddies. It really ruined what is one of the best cinemagraphic scenes I have ever seen...shame.
__________________
take this ring....for your labours will be heavy; but it will support you....and with it you may rekindle hearts in a world that grows chill |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tolkien's Languages | Forkbeard | Middle Earth | 3 | 10-14-2004 01:08 PM |
Tolkien's message =to die with dignity. Can any one help explain this interpretation | Seblor | Lord of the Rings Books | 6 | 12-18-2002 01:18 PM |