09-23-2008, 09:46 AM | #221 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
If individuals are supreme, Coffeehouse, then by your own progression no individual can impose his/her/its will on another. The zygote/embryo/fetus/baby is demonstrably an individual by scientific data in genetic and embryologic realms.
So, tell me again how it is that a pregnant woman has absolute power over another individual other than by mere power ("I'm bigger and you can't fight back"). And why is it that society has no ability to regulate this behaviour when it regulates much more in regard to human interactions? I'm waiting for argument rather than simple repeated declaration of your opinion. Preferably based on science facts, since that how we started and I demonstrated your "facts" in error.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
09-23-2008, 02:07 PM | #222 |
The Ñoldóran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 2,050
|
To me, science has very little to nothing to do with this debate. From the very moment of conception, the zygote/fetus/baby/whatever you want to call it - is the potential for human life. To deny that is ridiculous. It's not suddenly going to turn into a frog at some point.
This, however, does not make me any less pro-choice. Whether or not the termination of a pregnancy is moral or amoral is also unimportant to me in this debate. Different people will have different sets of moral beliefs that lead them to champion the superiority of the rights of either the mother or the baby, and these are not important to this debate. Why? Because we're not talking about declaring abortion immoral, we're talking about declaring abortion illegal. And that brings us to an entirely different set of circumstances. Not scientific, not moral, but based on a person's individual rights.. The fourth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects..." How secure am I in my person if the government has the right to tell me whether or not I can have a baby or not? Or to ask a related yet slightly different question, how secure are you in your person if the government can force sterilization, or if they can withhold the right to contraception? Let me state again, the legalization of abortion is not about abortion, but about the place of government in our most personal and private lives. It is not the place of the state to legislate morality, or to force a person to have (or not to have) a baby. It is not the place of the state to legislate on the grounds of moral beliefs that do not hold true for a good percentage of the population. It is not the place of the state to tell me how to live my life, or to decide when I can (or cannot) become a parent. These are the most private and personal of decisions, and I don't think that Congress should be deciding what happens inside my body. Abortion is, of course, a tragedy, and as someone said before, it is not the only tragedy involved. If Christian and pro-life groups want to counsel these women not to have abortions, to try to help them find a better way, then totally, go for it. But don't involve the state. It simply isn't their place.
__________________
Then Celegorm no more would stay, And Curufin smiled and turned away... ~The Lay of Leithian |
09-23-2008, 04:00 PM | #223 | ||||
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
Quote:
Quote:
Oh, nevermind ... Quote:
Quote:
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
||||
09-23-2008, 04:03 PM | #224 |
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
Well, but it does, in many ways. Where people disagree is which moral opinions should be legislated against. And depending upon a person's unproven, unprovable worldview, there are different answers to this.
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
09-23-2008, 04:31 PM | #225 |
Faithful Gardener
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I walk here and there, they say...
Posts: 3,603
|
This drives me crazy!!! I am pulling out my hair while I read arguments that do not agree with mine; I can understand your reasoning, but I do not agree with it! I just feel like NOTHING is happening in this debate but redundancy.
I'll leave it for a while, before I start shouting and saying idiotic things... But I might be back some day...
__________________
In God I trust, I will not be afraid. What can man do to me? Psalm 56:11 "Starbuck, what do you hear?" "Nothin' but the rain, sir!" "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." Make sure to check out the C.S. Lewis forum. Game threads, movie and book discussions and more! |
09-23-2008, 05:31 PM | #226 |
The Ñoldóran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 2,050
|
That's a debate, Midge, you can't expect people to agree with you all the time.
But Kudos to you for knowing when you've had enough and getting out before it's too late.
__________________
Then Celegorm no more would stay, And Curufin smiled and turned away... ~The Lay of Leithian |
09-23-2008, 05:34 PM | #227 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
"Let me state again, the legalization of abortion is not about abortion, but about the place of government in our most personal and private lives."
Like laws about driver licenses, intoxication, breaking and entering, the military draft registration, purchasing a home, medical care, drug use.... and all those other ways the government doesn't regulate our private lives, C?
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
09-23-2008, 05:39 PM | #228 |
The Ñoldóran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 2,050
|
It's a bit simplistic to group all those things together, inked.
Driver licenses, intoxication, breaking and entering, medical care, etc - these are things that affect the public good - i.e., are not personal but societal problems. Abortion concerns the woman and the woman alone. It doesn't hurt her next door neighbor if the woman has an abortion - unlike the things that you stated. I know that you will say that it will 'hurt' the 'baby,' but that's just something we're going to have to agree to disagree on, as it gets into matters (mostly) of faith and partially of fuzzy, contested scientific knowledge of when a fetus becomes "viable." As I am not a doctor or a scientist (except of the political variety ) I have no right to speak on that matter.
__________________
Then Celegorm no more would stay, And Curufin smiled and turned away... ~The Lay of Leithian |
09-23-2008, 06:05 PM | #229 | |||
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
The second aspect is the degree of potential and how much value we attach to it. An embryo has the potential for becoming an adult individual. I have the potential of becoming a dictator who will force everyone to dig a frog pond in their garden. Nobody is locking me up just yet for that. Any nuclear powerplant has the potential of going Tchernobyl on us. We haven't shut all of them down. An acorn had the potential to become a huge tree, but that doesn't mean I will immediately buy the biggest pot I can find to plant it in. So clearly not all sorts of potentials are deemed important enough to warrant action. We tend to measure and weigh them in a degree. For some people the potential a single cell possesses to become an adult is not enough to value that cell just as we would an adult. Quote:
Quote:
If everyone agreed, this sort of topic wouldn't be controversial, now would it?
__________________
We are not things. |
|||
09-23-2008, 06:36 PM | #230 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
Calling my opinion an opinion is touching. But these are all opinions, yours as mine. We disagree. I say a woman has the right to choose. You disagree. Deal with it, if you don't want to read my arguments for what they are, so be it
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." |
|
09-23-2008, 07:20 PM | #231 |
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
The point is that you don't HAVE arguments, Coffeehouse - you just state your opinions as if they are incontestable fact, and when people rightly question the validity of your statements, you say that they don't "get it".
I'd like to hear your thoughts on my observations on science. And I think a woman has the right to choose - she can choose to not have sex if she doesn't want to risk getting pregnant. Rape is a special case - the VAST majority of abortions are from consensual sex. And abortion is NOT only about the woman's body - there's also the baby's body, as well as the man who was involved (why do we hear so little about him?)
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
09-23-2008, 07:39 PM | #232 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
But save me distortions on what I've written, it makes for a poor strategy.
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." |
|
09-23-2008, 07:42 PM | #233 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,535
|
So, would you support abortion as a possibility in the case of rape?
__________________
That would be the swirling vortex to another world. Cool. I want one. TMNT No, I'm not emo. I just have a really poor sense of direction. (Thanks to katya for this quote) This is the best news story EVER! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26087293/ “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”...John McCain "I shall go back. And I shall find that therapist. And I shall whack her upside her head with my blanket full of rocks." ...Louisa May |
09-24-2008, 05:45 PM | #234 | |
Dread Mothy Lord and Halfwitted Apprentice Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 10,820
|
Quote:
You said that it is a potential human life; well and good! But should that not make it wrong to destroy it? Isn't it wrong, generally speaking, to end a human life? And wrong in such a way that it affects society? I see abortion as having a much larger effect on society, by depriving it of a future member, then an aging hippie lighting up a joint in Haight-Ashbury. This is especially true given the alarmingly low birth rates in the Western world (particularly in Europe).
__________________
Crux fidelis, inter omnes arbor una nobilis. Nulla talem silva profert, fronde, flore, germine. Dulce lignum, dulce clavo, dulce pondus sustinens. 'With a melon?' - Eric Idle |
|
09-25-2008, 02:30 AM | #235 | |
Entmoot Attorney-General,
Equilibrating the Scales of Justice, Administrator ♎ Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,891
|
Quote:
__________________
An unwritten post is a delightful universe of infinite possibilities. Set down one word, however, and it immediately becomes earthbound. Set down one sentence and it’s halfway to being just like every other bloody entry that’s ever been written. ☻ |
|
09-25-2008, 04:15 AM | #236 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ilha Formosa
Posts: 2,068
|
Quote:
You know what else deprives society of a future member? Banning in-vitro fertilisation.
__________________
Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep. Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man; But will they come when you do call for them? "I like pigs. Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals."- Winston Churchill |
|
09-25-2008, 10:56 AM | #237 |
Fair Dinkum
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,319
|
Currently, in my state of Victoria, a bill is waiting to be passed through the upper house of Parliament. It essentially decriminalises abortion (for which no one has been prosecuted for over 20 years), but surprisingly that is not the most controversial issue. There is a huge fuss about one of the provisions, which states that a doctor with a moral objection to performing abortions must refer the patient to someone who doesn't share that objection. So, there is much debate as to whether this constitutes a violation of the freedom to conscience. Critics of the provision say that it makes someone with a moral objection complicit in an action they find abhorrent, like someone opposed to torture being forced to send the torturee (I think I made that word up) to someone else, knowing the consequences.
What do you guys think? Personally, I'm pro-choice, but I think the provision needs to be changed, if not removed. I agree that it does undermine the freedom of conscience. (I also feel that the bill is less likely to be passed with that provision in force, but I don't want to discuss the issue of abortion per se right now). Last edited by Linaewen : 09-25-2008 at 10:59 AM. |
09-25-2008, 11:04 AM | #238 |
The Ñoldóran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 2,050
|
I can see both sides on that - it's similar to the controversy here in the US a while back that Walgreen's pharmacists don't have to dispense contraceptives to patients if they have moral objections.
And although I can see both sides, mostly I disagree with this, and here's why. It is not the place of the doctor (or pharmacist) to make moral judgments for the patient. If something is legal, and a patient goes to a doctor/pharmacist requesting a legal procedure, then they have the right to receive that service. It's not any different in my mind to me having to sell cigarettes at Walgreens - I have a moral objection to people smoking (especially around children, or while pregnant). I don't have the right to refuse the sale of cigarettes.
__________________
Then Celegorm no more would stay, And Curufin smiled and turned away... ~The Lay of Leithian Last edited by Curufin : 09-25-2008 at 11:05 AM. |
09-25-2008, 12:28 PM | #239 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
I think the provision is not a bad one. I can see the conflict for the doctors, but it also (IMO) avoids another possible moral conflict. If the patient has her mind made up to have an abortion, what would any doctor prefer: That the patient is referred to someone capable or that she goes looking on her own for someone less qualified but more willing to do the abortion where she might end up damaging her health, and instead of one victim you might have two? That's not going to sit lightly on anyone's [Hippocratic] oath either.
__________________
We are not things. |
09-25-2008, 12:48 PM | #240 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,535
|
Quote:
__________________
That would be the swirling vortex to another world. Cool. I want one. TMNT No, I'm not emo. I just have a really poor sense of direction. (Thanks to katya for this quote) This is the best news story EVER! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26087293/ “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”...John McCain "I shall go back. And I shall find that therapist. And I shall whack her upside her head with my blanket full of rocks." ...Louisa May |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Religion and Individualism | Beren3000 | General Messages | 311 | 04-17-2012 10:07 PM |
Abortion. | PippinTook | General Messages | 1004 | 06-18-2008 06:14 PM |
Abortion and Handguns | Aeryn | General Messages | 256 | 01-31-2003 01:39 AM |
Abortion | Gwaimir Windgem | General Messages | 9 | 01-28-2003 11:05 PM |
Let Gandalf smite the Abortion thread! | Gilthalion | General Messages | 7 | 08-27-2000 02:52 PM |