02-16-2010, 11:26 PM | #21 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
I note CJRT's interesting (and more recent than Silmarillion) entry for Eldar as published in The Children of Húrin: 'Eldar The Elves of the Great Journey out of the East to Beleriand.' This fits in fine with the Eldar or 'West-elves' of The Lord of the Rings. In any event, to compare apples to apples, so to speak: the Three Unions (as revised for the second edition) in Appendix A concerns the Edain and the Eldar -- and according to the same book (Appendix F), the Silvan Elves of Mirkwood and Lórien are not considered Eldar. Last edited by Galin : 03-02-2010 at 03:22 PM. |
|
02-20-2010, 04:50 PM | #22 |
AngAdan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 856
|
Regardless of their different language, the Nandor were by definition Eldar.
To the source: SIL, pg 309, cahrt of "The sudering of the Elves Nandor are under Teleri are under Eldar underneath Nandor (and Sindar and Laiquendi) is the caption "Umanyar, The Eldar who were not of Aman SIL, index (which also seems to be a glossary) pg 326 Eldar ... (orignally) "all the Elves" (as called by Orome), Later "...the Elves of the Three Kindreds (Vanyar, Noldor, Teleri) who set out on the freat westward march from Cuivienen (whether or not they remained in Middle-Earth)..." SIL, index, page 342: "the Nandor were those of the Teleri who refused to cross the Misty Mountains...." SIL, Index, pg 348 "Silvan Elves ... they appear to have been in origin those Nandorian Elves who never passed west of the Misty Mountains" SIL, index, pg 350: Teleri The third and greatest of the three hosts of the Eldar ... the Sindar and Nandor were Telerin..."
__________________
Gaius Mucius Scaevola Older, richer, and wiser than you "Mighty are the Ainur, and mightiest among them is Melkor, but that he may know, and all the Ainur, that I am Iluvatar, those things that ye have sung, I will show them forth, ... And thou, Melkor, shalt see that no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me," |
02-20-2010, 07:01 PM | #23 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Yes, but that's all unpublished text (not published by the author himself).
Concerning the matter raised by Legolas (the legend of Elven-blood in connection to Dol Amroth) and the passage regarding the Three Unions: if the legend is true, the Elf who married a mortal is implied to be a Silvan Elf of Lórien: 'It is long since the people of Nimrodel left the woodlands of Lórien, and yet still once can see that not all sailed from Amroth's haven west over water.' And Appendix B: '1981 Many of the Silvan Elves of Lórien flee south. Amroth and Nimrodel are lost.' When the three unions and the descriptions from Appendix F are considered -- noting that the former passage was altered by Tolkien for the second edition to read Eldar rather than Elves -- a natural enough association is that a Silvan, non-eldarin East-elf is connected with the legend. This works well enough even with the late text Amroth And Nimrodel (1969 or later). Amroth says that passage Over Sea: '... is granted also now to any of those who made the Great Journey, even if they did not come in ages past to the shores and have not yet beheld the Blessed Land.' If we plug in The Lord of the Rings here, Amroth might be saying: even if one is not of the Eldar... or, looking at the 'Mithrellas note' from Unfinished Tales, where Tolkien distinguishes Mithrellas as not being of the High Elves or the Grey but of the 'lesser Silvan Race', this fits too I think -- as not being of the High Elves or the Grey basically meant not being one of the Eldar or West-elves. Tolkien also wrote that any who began the Great Journey were certainly Eldar (Christopher Tolkien did not invent the idea for The Silmarillion of course), however he did not always think so (see The Lhammas IIRC), and he did not publish this in any case. One could attempt to explain how everything Tolkien wrote concerning the term Eldar fits here, but for myself, although I have thought about it, in any event I don't see a great need to do that; or at least I see no problem with the approach I've taken. Whenever the three unions comes up, often enough so does the Mithrellas legend -- and often enough along with this, also the 'definition' of Eldar as anyone who began the Great March. But why not bring up what Tolkien himself published here? which works better with respect to this matter in my opinion. Last edited by Galin : 02-20-2010 at 07:45 PM. |
02-20-2010, 11:56 PM | #24 |
AngAdan
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Boerne, Texas
Posts: 856
|
LoTR can hardly be a considered source regarding the Nandor, since they are not mentioned therein. Nor will you get very far arguing that the SIL is not the best source for the material which it covers, and LoTR does not (particularly inside The Silmarillion subforum). But, we cannot be confident that Mithrellas was of Nandorin descent, Since Silvan also included the Avari who blended into their culture, and by the time of Amroth many Avari had moved into Lorien and Mirkwood, particularly during the War of Elves and Sauron in the 2nd age.
__________________
Gaius Mucius Scaevola Older, richer, and wiser than you "Mighty are the Ainur, and mightiest among them is Melkor, but that he may know, and all the Ainur, that I am Iluvatar, those things that ye have sung, I will show them forth, ... And thou, Melkor, shalt see that no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me," Last edited by Lefty Scaevola : 02-21-2010 at 06:33 PM. |
02-21-2010, 05:03 AM | #25 |
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
The essay “Quendi and Eldar” published in War of the Jewels (HoME vol. XI) was written 1959-60. In it, the Nandor are considered Eldar, and both Nandor and Avari (proper Avari, about half Tatyar/second clan/*ñgolodō (with a little “n”, signifying the original clan before it split over the Great Journey) and half Nelyar/third clan/*lindā) had migrated into Beleriand; in fact, the first Elves Fëanor and his followers encountered were Tatyar Avari, who recognized their ancient clan kinship with the returning rebellious Caliquendi.
For the folk of Dol Amroth, Mithrellas was not a legend, but the wife of Imrazôr and mother of Galador. The heritage was immediately obvious to Legolas almost a thousand years later even after 22 generations. We cannot imagine that this was the only intermarriage of Men and Elves in Middle-earth; however, only three intermarriages took place between their ruling families. These three are Beren-Lúthien, Tuor-Idril, and Aragorn-Arwen. Finrod speaking to Andreth is a member of the royal house of the Second Clan (Noldor with a capital “N”) to a member of the ruling family of the First House of the Edain. I remain in agreement with Varnafindë that his discussion with her indicates that such unions had taken place before, that they “ended badly,” if you will: the lovers were forever separated, as were Dior Eluch*l and Nimloth. This is the crucial matter that Finrod and Andreth are debating: Andreth is complaining that she will bear that ultimate separation if Finrod’s brother Aegnor will return her love, to which Finrod – who is genuinely fond of Andreth and knows for certain that Aegnor truly loves her and will never love another, not even another Elf – explains that there cannot be a union of this sort between – and here I am interpolating – his kinsfolk, the High Elves and Grey Elves, and Men except for some great matter of Doom. Does the essay “Quendi and Eldar” group the Nandor along with the Sindar in Middle-earth? Yeah, it does, and it’s later than LotR, and it explicitly says the Eldar include the Nandor. Is that what Tolkien was thinking when he wrote LotR and said that Imrahil’s ancestor was an elf, or when with some pains he explicitly lays out this union between Imrazôr and Mithrellas in “The House of Dol Amroth” in 1954, which is included in the chapter “Heirs of Elendil” in Peoples of Middle-earth (HoME vol. XII), or when he wrote “Athrabeth Finrod ah Andreth” around 1959 (Morgoth’s Ring) – apparently contemporaneously with “Quendi and Eldar”? I don’t think it is. I was going to argue that the Nandor were not consistently lumped with the Eldar, and for that point I found facsimiles several hand-drawn charts in the chapter “Lhammas” in Lost Road (HoME vol. V); but to my surprise, the Nandor – here called Ilkorindi (“not of Kôr [Tirion]”) – are a subset of the Eldar. Presumably the Ilkorindi were both the Sindar and what we are calling the Nandor as well. It doesn’t seem to me that precludes Mithrellas’ being one of the Nandor. I don’t get the sense when I read his stories that Tolkien was either carefully or consistently employing the distinction that the Nandor were Eldar. He was careful to always distinguish the Sindar as Eldar, even though they had never seen the Two Trees (except for Elu Thingol). But it seems to me – and I could very easily be wrong – that when Tolkien is writing narrative, the Nandor and Avari are getting lumped together as non-Eldar. The distinction of the Nandor as Eldar in the narratives seems at best very sloppy compared his consistently rigorous distinction of the Sindar as Eldar. Tolkien talks about the “Light Elves”, the Vanyar; the “High Elves”, the Noldor; and the “Grey Elves”, the Sindar. These are the Eldar. Are Nandor “Grey Elves”? No, they’re “Green Elves”. Well, yeah, technically they are; but Tolkien doesn’t seem to treat them that way, and in the narratives, they don’t appear to be Eldar. Of course, the Green Elves of Ossiriand told Finrod the Atani (Men) were their “unfriends”, so they were probably loathe to intermarry with them, while perhaps the Avari were not so strongly disinclined. Then again, after living with Lúthien and Beren during their brief sojourn in Middle-earth after returning from Mandos, maybe the Green Elves changed their minds about Men. Who knows? Going back to Belwen_of_nargothrond’s original question, did Beren’s handling the Silmaril violate some rule that mortals could not handle a Silmaril? Obviously not, because he handled it. When Lúthien returned from Mandos with Beren, although she was still an Elf and the daughter of a Maia, she was also mortal, and she handled it and wore it, though Tolkien says that this may have hastened her demise. I have already presented an argument (that I hope is fairly convincing) that Dior is mortal because both his parents are mortal: he handled and wore the Silmaril as well, apparently without any bad effects: of itself, it didn’t shorten his life, though the Sons of Fëanor did out of covetousness of it. In the other hand, Maedhros and Maglor could not handle it, though they were not mortal. In light of the issue of whether the Nandor are consistently treated as Eldar in the narratives (as opposed to the definition essays), I suggest that the “rule” that mortals could not handle the Silmaril is a loose end: it sounds great when you read it in the sense that it has a catchy literary ring to it, but it isn’t consistently applied: in fact, it seems to me to be consistently ignored. |
02-22-2010, 12:28 AM | #26 | |||||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
I also choose to imagine Celebrimbor as a Feanorian rather than a Telerin Elf, for instance, no matter that Tolkien wrote the latter idea later than he published the Feanorian detail. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's perhaps not easy to imagine Legolas being wrong about this, and that the traditions of Dol Amroth included a tale of fancy, but on the other hand, the marriage seems purposely characterized as a legend (interesting to note that Mithrellas 'slipped away by night and he saw her no more' after bearing the children of Imrazor. After a time even Imrazor himself could not produce his Elven wife as 'proof' of the story). Perhaps the idea (ultimately) is: beyond the famed unions this one 'other union' should not be wholly certain. For myself, I think that intermarriage between Elves and Men was meant to be seen as a rare event. In draft letter 153 Tolkien is speaking quite generally with respect to Elves and Men: 'Elves and men are evidently in biological terms one race, or they could not breed and produce fertile offspring -- even as a rare event: there are 2 cases only in my legends of such unions, and they are merged in the descendants of Earendil.' (1954) Footnote to this section of the letter: 'One would expect 'three cases', cf The Lord of the Rings III 314: 'There were three unions of the Eldar and the Edain...' (note that this footnote refers to the wording of the second edition incidentally -- the first edition did not read Eldar and Edain, but High Elves and Men IIRC). Quote:
As to Finrod's statement (high purpose of Doom and so on), I note Tolkien's commentary, including his use of more general 'Elves and Men' here: 'Finrod thus was slain before the two marriages of Elves and Men had taken place, though without his aid the marriage of Beren and Luthien would not have come to pass. The marriage of Beren certainly fulfilled his prediction that such marriages would only be for some high purpose of Doom, and that the least cruel fate would be that death should soon end them.' Back to Eldar: in The Lhammas the Danas, at least at one point, were not 'certainly' considered Eldar, even though they began the Great March. Christopher Tolkien notes: 'In any case, the Danas are sufficiently characterized as Elves of the Great March who abandoned it early on but who still felt the desire for the West, and the suggestion in B is clearly that it was this that brought a part of the people over the mountains. Their position is anomalous, and might equally well be classified either as Eldarin or as not Eldarin.' CJRT, commentary section 7 The Lhammas, The Lost Road And Other Writings We could attempt to maybe blend the conceptions in an internal way; for example: the term Eldar narrowed in application ('Star-folk' narrowed in application to exclude the other Star-folk who refused the March), and so it generally refers to The Marchers/People of the Stars (see Elda and Eldo in Quendi And Eldar), as in any who began the March. But possibly this narrowed again due to certain Elves giving up the March 'too early' -- arguably considered as not true Eldor or Marchers -- and thus Eldar/Eldor narrows again to refer to any who reached the Undying Lands or Beleriand, this becoming the true meaning of being a Marcher. The etymological discussion concerning the Telerin Tawarwaith seems to contain the expression 'in origin Eldar'. Perhaps readers could imagine something similar to the Danas of The Lhammas: the Nandor could be considered Eldar in one sense, but not Eldar according to its later application. That said, when one brings up the three unions and the Mithrellas legend, this take on Eldar might seem like wriggling. If so... again, why not go with Tolkien-published text here Last edited by Galin : 03-02-2010 at 03:22 PM. |
|||||
03-18-2010, 10:00 AM | #27 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Alcuin, since you appear to be back at the moment, how do the children of Elrond fit in with your previous commentary?
Tolkien also refers to them as half-elven IIRC, anyway. |
03-18-2010, 01:30 PM | #28 | ||
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
Quote:
Again, vbCode [IMG] is disabled in this part of Entmoot, at least for me; it works fine in other parts. I have the lineage of Elrond and Arwen worked out as fractions of Elves and Men at http://www.zarkanya.net/Tolkien/ArwenLineage.jpg. I don’t recall that Tolkien ever specifically called Elladan, Elrohir, and Arwen “Halfelves”. By the union of Aragorn and Arwen, the long-sundered lines of the Peredhil were reunited, but the Peredhil in this case were properly Elros and Elrond, and the union of Aragorn and Arwen brought together the two distinct family lines descended from Eärendil and Elwing. Elrond was Halfelven, accounted by his choice as an Elf; his children were given the same grace to choose as was their father, but not Elros’ children: a bone of contention among many of Elros’ descendents. Furthermore, “The Drowning of Anadûnê” (Sauron Defeated) says that, Quote:
|
||
03-18-2010, 03:10 PM | #29 | ||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
In letter 345 (1972) Tolkien wrote: 'Arwen was not an Elf, but one of the half-elven who abandoned her elvish rights.' Quote:
Italic lettering as printed in Sauron Defeated. |
||
03-19-2010, 11:51 AM | #30 | |
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
If Tolkien wrote it, then it must be so. Were I given an opportunity to sit and speak with him, or to correspond with him – both of which I hope to do, but I’d like to put them off for several decades at least – I would first point out the fact that, within the legendarium, Dior had died and passed through the Halls of Mandos – and by Tolkien’s own telling, passed through and left Arda as a mortal Man normally would: hence the assumption on the part of Irmo Mandos that the Peredhil were mortal. I would also object, as did the Númenórean Kings, that Elrond’s children obtained the right to choose to which race they would be accounted, while Elros’ children obtained no such grace: “once mortal, ever mortal”; but this was the same rule Mandos propounded, that Manwë had set aside for Eärendil, Elwing, and Elrond. (And Tuor, but he is never mentioned in this argumentative context.)
I might snidely remark that Letter 345 was written in the last ten months of Tolkien’s life, and perhaps his views then did not reflect those he held for most of his writing, as is the case with whether Celeborn was Sindar of Beleriand or Teleri of Eldamar; but I think that would achieve no good end, because I think it is itself not an accurate assessment: it would appear that this does indeed accurately reflect Tolkien’s position on the matter. I might even resort to being tacky and note that Letter 345 is a discussion of naming cows and heifers, but that is simply ad hominem and counter-productive. So in the end, I will have to agree that “Arwen was not an Elf, but one of the half-elven who abandoned her elvish rights.” She was, by blood, more than three-quarters Elven (in fact, more than half Lindar, either Sindar or Teleri); and even if her great-grandfather Dior had been fully mortal, as I argue he was, she would have inherited only a quarter of mortal-ness, whatever that might be. But if Arwen is Peredhil, would you argue that also for Aragorn? How then would you resolve the statement in Appendix A, Quote:
|
|
03-19-2010, 01:55 PM | #31 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Any person of mixed blood, having mortal blood in any measure, is mortal with respect to fate -- though being still 'mixed' with respect to heritage. As I see it, this was the will of God as revealed in the 1930s Silmarillion. If so, with respect to the children of Elros Halfelven, by reason of Elros' choice, the 'natural order' was restored, so to speak. However the children of Elrond -- or any mortal-blooded child of 'one who chooses an Elvish fate' -- cannot be automatically mortal-fated, because then they would be automatically sundered from at least one parent, even possibly beyond death. Nor can the children of an Elvish-fated parent, having some measure of mortal heritage, automatically be denied death -- escape from the Circles of the World, and Time. So, in a sense it might be said to be inherent in the choice, before it is even made, that the 'fair rule' concerning the children of 'one who chooses an Elvish fate', includes that they too must be free to decide -- again, by God's 'edict' Elrond's children will otherwise be automatically mortal-fated, having mortal blood, and automatically sundered from Elrond. It would hardly make the choice of 'immortality' easy if one's children must die as mortals. Still, as it turned out, Elrond suffered this great sundering from Arwen -- and in my opinion, I tend to lean toward his sons choosing mortality as well. Again, this is nowhere stated by Tolkien, but something I've arrived at myself. Anyone can feel free to rend it! if anyone really feels it's problematic. Last edited by Galin : 03-19-2010 at 02:45 PM. |
|
03-19-2010, 03:52 PM | #32 |
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
That’s pretty good! I think I rather like that: its fits all the loose ends into a nice, neat bundle. Is that a Tolkien rule of Arda thermodynamics: mortality is the lower energy level?
Somehow, it rather fits, too: Elrond is separated from Arwen by his previous choice, which differs from hers, and Arwen suffers the same ambivalence about death as the Númenóreans whom she had scorned as “wicked fools”. Last edited by Alcuin : 03-19-2010 at 03:56 PM. |
03-19-2010, 10:10 PM | #33 |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Thanks Alcuin! I've been trying it out on the web here and there -- not much negative reaction so far, but not much reaction of any kind so far, actually! Of course many have posted (before me) the idea that Elrond's children cannot be denied the escape of mortal death... but I don't remember seeing the 'sundering aspect' worked in before...
... and all based on something in the 1930s Silmarillion! There might be an unpublished letter out there that rends it all (if no one else does)... if so, and it comes to light one day, I'll add in advance: ah well! never mind. Last edited by Galin : 03-19-2010 at 10:15 PM. |
03-22-2010, 09:23 PM | #34 |
Salt Miner
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: gone to Far Harad
Posts: 987
|
Schematic of Arwen’s lineage in terms of race and house. I can only insert graphics into this part of Entmoot while in Edit mode.
http://www.zarkanya.net/Tolkien/ArwenLineage.jpg Nope. Works in threads on The Hobbit, but not in these. Here's the code: No graphics permitted in threads on Silmarillion or Lord of the Rings? Last edited by Alcuin : 03-22-2010 at 09:29 PM. |
08-02-2010, 10:44 PM | #35 |
Sapling
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Raleigh North Carolina
Posts: 4
|
just like Earendil was suffered on the shores of Valinor. when no mortal man would ever find the shores. it was a great exception. it is the great will of iluvatar.
|