|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-08-2003, 03:19 PM | #41 | |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
But I personally agree with The Gaffer and Artanis: in my opinion movie-Frodo is different in some aspects from book-Frodo.
__________________
We are not things. |
|
10-08-2003, 03:31 PM | #42 | |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
Quote:
Of course, that's a different debate entirely. I guess the real question being posed here is whether or not the portrayal of Frodo in the films has necessarily changed how you feel about Frodo as a character when you go back to the book and read it. For those of us who thought Frodo in the film was a pretty good representation of how we always saw him, I don't think our relationships with his characterization in the book is going to be affected all that much. I remember how the first time I came out of FOTR, still working out what I just saw and in a great deal of shock (many qualms and questions still remained to be settled by the second viewing), I was very impressed by Elijah Wood's performance in particular. How close the film was to the book is in itself a redundant debate with no solid answers either way. Some of today's top Tolkien scholars can be seen on completely opposite sides of the issue. It's really a matter of how we recognize or justify the similarities and differences on a personal level - and that's where our personal relationships to the book and films, as individuals, becomes key.
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
|
10-08-2003, 06:36 PM | #43 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
You need to remember that a hobbits lifespan is much longer than ours and that a hobbit didn't "come of age" until he was 33 instead of the age 18 that we generally associate with adulthood. Given this fact, its logical to assume that a "Fiftysomething" Frodo would look twentysomething. |
|
10-09-2003, 02:30 AM | #44 | ||
Greatest Elven woman of Aman
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Having way too much fun with Fëanor's 7
Posts: 4,285
|
Quote:
Quote:
And about Hobbits coming of age at 33 I interpret more as a cultural difference rather than a result of their physical development. If you think of it, most people in our culture don't start their lives as 'adults' before they're 30-something, I mean settling down with marriage and children and taking on responsibility, and I guess this is what happens to a Hobbit when he/she is 33, it is farewell to the "irresponsible twenties between childhood and coming of age at thirty-three".
__________________
--Life is hard, and then we die. Last edited by Artanis : 10-09-2003 at 02:38 AM. |
||
10-09-2003, 03:12 AM | #45 |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
I'm not sure about that. I think in terms of hobbit ages, both the physical and mental lifespans are very clearly inflated compared to ours. The concept of their irresponsible "tweens" is very clearly a take on our world's teens, eleventy-one seems to be a particular marker like our ninety or one hundred, and the Old Took's one hundred and thirty is a milestone in itself.
And appearance-wise, you have to note that the effect of the Ring was that Frodo looked very much at fifty as he did at thirty-three - hence why the younger hobbits would have caught up to him in how old they looked.
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
10-09-2003, 04:13 AM | #46 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Quote:
Film Frodo: is a teenager, has a look of terror on his face all the time, runs away from fights (Moria), doesn't defy the Nazgul (Fords), OFFERS THE ******* RING TO THE NAZGUL FOR ****'S SAKE (Osgiliath), is completely taken in by Smeagol, is already completely under the Ring's control Book Frodo: is a mature adult (your hogwash about lifespans notwithstanding), takes the lead, communicates with Sam, only loses the plot once (MInas Morgul), defies the Nazgul, thinks carefully about what to do next, etc etc. As far as appearance goes, EW certainly looks the part. This isn't about appearance though. Last edited by The Gaffer : 10-09-2003 at 04:15 AM. |
|
10-09-2003, 07:30 AM | #47 |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
... and the thread spirals out of control...
But seriously, guys. I realize the importance of debating the characterization of Frodo in the film, but let's keep this thread from veering into a "was the film faithful" slugfest. We have several of those already that I wouldn't mind you bringing back up to the top. (And I'll gladly join you there.)
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
10-09-2003, 07:56 AM | #48 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Happy to oblige; that would be why I only mentioned it in passing before. On reflection, though, I think it's very relevant to this question.
Frodo is the principal character through which we relate to the story (in the books). Particularly in FOTR, nothing happens that we don't see through his eyes. One of the many things that is great about the book is that the author gradually expands this perspective throughout TTT and ROTK, then draws it back in again at the end. By necessity, films have to give a broader perspective. So, to take the point further, by changing Frodo's role and character, and adopting a broader perspective, the film changes how we relate to the story from the outset. We don't gradually discover the plot in the same way that Frodo does. The role of Aragorn would be a good example of that: in the film, it's clear from early on that he's "heir to the throne of Gondor" (thanks, Legolas). In the book, this only becomes apparent in TTT, and the full significance doesn't really sink in until ROTK. My guess is that this difference would make the viewer experience the story as something which happens to include hobbits, rather than the reader's experience of something which is experienced by hobbits. BTW, I think the films are great too. Just because there are differences in how characters and story are played out doesn't necessarily mean I'm saying "book rules, film sucks". Some things about the film are better, IMHO. |
10-09-2003, 09:45 AM | #49 |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
It's funny that you bring up the notion of the characters "discovering" the plot. The first time I watched FOTR, one of the most major things I noticed was that it's not until the Council of Elrond that the destruction of the Ring is even introduced as an option. In the book, Gandalf mentions throwing the thing into the Cracks of Doom as early as I.2, "The Shadow of the Past". I think this is in keeping with how the linearity of the film demands a more streamlined action-reaction plot, but as you mentioned, the converse is true in many cases - such as the early revelation of Aragorn's claim to the throne.
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
10-09-2003, 03:16 PM | #50 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
I don't dispute that there are many variations between the books and the films. But I get irritated with ill-informed Purists who whine on and on about how that villian Jackson "completely changed Frodo's role and character" and then, when pressed, proceed to give us lame examples such as the ones below (in bold) from The Gaffer:
Film Frodo is a teenager I already addressed the common mistake many so-called 'Purists' have made in envisioning Frodo as a fiftysomething human. (I'm soooo glad I never pictured one of my favorite book characters as some old geezer!) Film Frodo has a look of terror on his face all the time If you don't think Book Frodo was afraid, you don't know the books nearly as well as you think you do -- which is too bad because that was an important part of Tolkien's vision. Film Frodo runs away from fights (Moria) Runs Away? You must have seen a different version of the movie than I did. Frodo fought the goblins like everyone else in the Fellowship did. He did hide from the cave troll (as did Merry & Pippin). Frankly, having Frodo fight a cave troll WOULD HAVE CHANGED Frodo's character because he certainly wasn't an idiot!!!. But when the cave troll tried to grab him, Frodo did fight back, cutting the troll's hand with Sting. Film Frodo doesn't defy the Nazgul (Fords). This whole stupid Purist arguement that Film Frodo's character changed revolves around this one. No, Frodo didn't defy the Nazgul at the Fords. But it is a huge stretch to say that this one plot change resulted in a total personality change for Frodo. The reality is that some Purists absolutely hated the flight to the ford's plot change and desperately want to be able to say it ruined the rest of the film series. Sorry, but the plot changed worked and, from a screenplay perspective, it makes total sense. Another way to look at it is that Jackson wanted to follow Tolkien's lead and "make it all feel real." Unlike the book, showing a three-foot hobbit on death's door riding a large stallion over a great distance with the ringwraiths in close pursuit would have looked hokey at best and fakey at worst. Film Frodo OFFERS THE ******* RING TO THE NAZGUL FOR ****'S SAKE (Osgiliath) Like most Purist arguements, this one is based on fantasy, not reality. Watch the DVD again. Frodo doesn't offer the ring to the Nazgul. He's got the ring attached to the chain around his neck. He's simply being tempted to put the ring on. Film Frodo is completely taken in by Smeagol How would you describe Book Frodo's relationship with Smeagol? Please share with us how dramatically different their relationship is between the books and the films. Film Frodo is already completely under the Ring's control Completely under the ring's control? That's a rather sweeping statement. If you are referring to how Frodo acts in Osgiliath, you might want to check out how Frodo acts in the valley of Minas Morgul. |
10-09-2003, 03:50 PM | #51 | |
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen |
|
10-09-2003, 04:33 PM | #52 | |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
Quote:
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
|
10-09-2003, 05:20 PM | #53 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
|
|
10-09-2003, 11:19 PM | #54 | |
Fowl Administrator
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary or Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 53,420
|
Quote:
His motives are equivalently evident, yes, but that's if you count the background explored in Appendix A. Obviously the film wasn't going to tack on a half-hour segment about Aragorn and Arwen at the very end, so naturally it integrated the goods of it into the primary narrative. That's what I was referring to.
__________________
All of IronParrot's posts are guaranteed to be 100% intelligent and/or sarcastic, comprising no genetically modified content and tested on no cute furry little animals unless the SPCA is looking elsewhere. If you observe a failure to uphold this warranty, please contact a forum administrator immediately to receive a full refund on your Entmoot registration. Blog: Nick's Café Canadien |
|
10-10-2003, 04:17 AM | #55 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
IronParrot has expressed what I meant regarding Aragorn better than I did. You have to see it in the context of a reader/viewer who does not know what's going to happen.
Frodo/Smeagol is dealt with very differently. In the film, they do a fantastic job of making us see the parallels between them, right down to an implicit identity (Frodo IS Smeagol). This is a stroke of genius, since we don't know that Smeagol was a hobbit. In the book, it is pity that rules their relationship, and the fact that "servant" Smeagol has a claim on "Master" Frodo. BTW, it looks to me as if this will be played out in more detail in ROTK. I agree that many of the other examples I quoted are open to interpretation, but I don't think you can dismiss them on the basis of not having watched the film often enough. I've (only) seen TTT twice, which is probably once more than most people, and both times it was my impression that Frodo was offering the ring up to the (Harrier jump-jet equipped) Nazgul. To credit the film-makers with any sort of ability, you have to assume that this was, at the very least, supposed to be ambiguous. I don't recall saying that Frodo was not afraid in the books. Perhaps I did not make myself clear: the point is that, in the books, Frodo is the central character and he takes us through a whole gamut of complex emotions. Similarly, the point made about his age was to do with his maturity, not his appearance. It is, of course, possible to deride all comment as being the ravings of an "ill-informed purist". That, in itself, has no bearing on their validity and is simply childish name-calling. |
10-10-2003, 07:25 AM | #56 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Black Breathalizer : 10-10-2003 at 07:44 AM. |
||
10-10-2003, 08:43 AM | #57 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by The Gaffer : 10-10-2003 at 08:47 AM. |
||
10-10-2003, 01:58 PM | #58 | |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 828
|
Quote:
BB-éagol: No! No! We must be nice to The Gaffer! Gollum: The Gaffer is a Purist. He will cheat you, hurt you and ... WHINE!!! BB-éagol: But The Gaffer is a Mooter. He's one of our friends. Gollum: You don't have any friends. Nobody likes you. BB-éagol: Not listening. Not listening. Gollum: You're a blowhard ... a jerk... BB-éagol: No. Gollum: TROLL!!! BB-éagol: Go away. Gollum: Go away?! Ahahhaa!" BB-éagol: I hate you, I hate you! Gollum: Where would you be without me? ... gollum...gollum ... I save us every day. It is me. We survive on this stupid message board because of ME!" BB-éagol: Not anymore. Gollum: What did you say? BB-éagol: Master IronParrot looks after us now. He's a bigshot Mooter administrator with thousands upon thousands of thoughtful posts. He even has the power to close or move whole threads!!! We don't need you anymore. Gollum: What? BB-éagol: Leave now and never come back. Gollum: No! BB-éagol: Leave now and never come back! Gollum: Arrrgh! BB-éagol: LEAVE NOW AND NEVER COME BACK! silence. BB-éagol: Yippiee!!! BB is FREE!!! (BB turns and faces you, the reader.) This means I'll be nice to you if you be nice to ussss. You can trust BB. Honest. |
|
10-10-2003, 04:52 PM | #59 | |
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
I have to respectfully disagree again, because in the books it is made apparent that Smeagol came from Hobbitt descendency. Gandalf actually talks about it.
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen |
|
10-10-2003, 04:55 PM | #60 | |
High King of Númenórë
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Númenórë <--United States of America
Posts: 1,947
|
Quote:
__________________
'Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta!' - And those were the words that Elendil spoke when he came up out of the Sea on the wings of the wind: 'Out of the Great Sea to Middle-earth I am come. In this place will I abide, and my heirs, unto the ending of the world.' 'Then Tuor arrayed himself in the hauberk, and set the helm upon his head, and he girt himself with the sword; black were sheath and belt with clasps of silver. Thus armed he went forth from Turgon's hall, and stood upon the high terraces of Taras in the red light of the sun. None were there to see him, as he gazed westward, gleaming in silver and gold, and he knew not that in that hour he appeared as one of the Mighty of the West, and fit to be father of the kings of the Kings of Men beyond the Sea, as it was indeed his doom to be; but in the taking of those arms a change came upon Tuor son of Huor, and his heart grew great within him. And as he stepped down from the doors the swans did him reverence, and plucking each a great feather from their wings they proffered them to him, laying their long necks upon the stone before his feet; and he took the seven feathers and set them in the crest of his helm, and straightway the swans arose and flew north in the sunset, and Tuor saw them no more.' -Of Tuor and his Coming to Gondolin "Oh. Forgive me, fairest of all males of Entmoot...Back down, all ye other wannabe fairest males! Dunedain is the fairest!" --Linaewen |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Evidence for Creationism and Against Evolution | Rían | General Messages | 1149 | 08-16-2004 06:07 PM |
Should movie fans read the books? | jerseydevil | Lord of the Rings Movies | 34 | 12-06-2003 09:54 PM |
What do you think? | samwiselvr2008 | Harry Potter | 17 | 05-08-2003 03:10 PM |
Why Books are Better than Drugs | emplynx | General Literature | 160 | 09-20-2002 07:03 PM |
I am going to buy some books!!!!! | emplynx | General Literature | 15 | 05-13-2002 07:32 PM |