Global Warming Debate

[Jonathan]

Inked, I'd love if you could describe your links more in detail before posting them - otherwise I'll sense no incentive to read them unless (like now) I'm procrastinating Just throwing forth a link with a cryptic headline doesn't always attract readers...

I like how the person in the first link took time to investigate news of melting polar ices in the NY Times, from 128 years back to today. But if you call journalistic presentations "real science", you're broadening the concept quite a lot!

As a reaction to your second link, I'll give you something that BoP dug up:
Primate change

By the way Inked, I never quite grasped where you stand on all this. You're a sceptic of course but scepticism can present itself on so many levels. For instance:

Do you just object to how so many people can believe in the media's presentation of global warming?

Do you also think that the scientific data itself is at fault?

Do you reject the notion of "manmade" global warming?

Do you believe we are not in a period of global warming at all?

Do you maybe believe we are on the verge of another ice age? (Well I don't know )