03-20-2005, 10:30 PM | #11 | ||
Elf Lord
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fountain Valley, CA
Posts: 6,343
|
You say "moral" as though it were a bad word. The current definition of marriage is between a man and a woman. In most places. Acceptance of homosexuality means a redefinition to this. The state is saying that couplings aside from a man and a woman have the right to make this statement. And if two men can do the job of raising a child as well as a man and a woman, then three men can too, or four men, or five. Indeed, surely they can do the job even better (since marriage with a partnership is seen as normally preferable to situations with a single parent). So as far as the child is concerned, this kind of marriage would sound great. As far as interpersonal relationships is concerned- why not three? Really, why not?
Quote:
It already has been defined as between a man and a woman. Why do you think it would it stop with two adults, really? Quote:
__________________
If the world has indeed, as I have said, been built of sorrow, it has been built by the hands of love, because in no other way could the soul of man, for whom the world was made, reach the full stature of its perfection. ~Oscar Wilde, written from prison Oscar Wilde's last words: "Either the wallpaper goes, or I do." |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homosexual marriage II | klatukatt | General Messages | 736 | 05-15-2013 01:15 PM |
marriage | katya | General Messages | 384 | 01-21-2012 12:13 AM |
Gays, lesbians, bisexuals | Nurvingiel | General Messages | 988 | 02-06-2006 01:33 PM |
Ave Papa - we have a new Pope | MrBishop | General Messages | 133 | 09-26-2005 10:19 AM |
Women, last names and marriage... | afro-elf | General Messages | 55 | 01-09-2003 01:37 AM |