Quote:
Originally posted by Lizra
Sorry CBG, I think you're just sour grapes on the Beatles. Your opinion is in the very, very small minority, I don't agree at all
|
Sour grapes is wrong, like I have said twice before, I like the Beatles, I just believe they are over rated. I know I am in the minority, it doesn't mean I'm wrong, popular opinion and belief does not mean it is correct or true.
Quote:
Originally posted by BeardofPants
Their music evolved from simple harmonies (blues) into more complex structures. Their music is more interesting because it has an asymmetric structure to it. While "Please Please" me has a rather annoying 3 chord structure, their music changed drastically during the later stages. "Michelle" has complex harmonies, and it stands up to improvisation, which is why jazz musicians sometimes use it as a standard. Most of Paul McCartney's stuff has some classic good harmonic progression, and generally works within the western harmonic traditions. John however, tended to step outside the boundaries of western harmonic tradition; experimenting heavily with electronic music and lyrical profundity. He also experimented with the traditional harmonic structures, and in doing so, perhaps changed our perception of what defines traditional harmonies.
|
The Beatles did not change music theory, the idea that they did is absurd. I still stand by my belief that most Beatles songs are simple and they are not the greatest musicans.