10-01-2002, 09:24 AM | #11 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Durham, England
Posts: 694
|
bropous
"But then again, the Hitchhiker's series, while extremely witty, insightful and entertaining, simply isn't in the class that Lord of the Rings is, but I don't think you were implying" Quite right, no such implication intended. Just an interesting example of the original writer happy to adapt to the medium. "But then again, maybe ol' Ronald was just a lot more stubborn, a lot more willing to not let his works be remade unless done properly, and, frankly, far crankier and grumpier about the "ownership" [oooo, full circle] of his own creation to allow someone else to alter it for the sake of distributing his works to the "unwashed masses." " Maybe. Probably, in fact. But couldn't he then have taken measures to never sell the film rights? (that's a genuine question, I'm not sure how feasible that is after the death of the author). Also this sort of debate always brings to mind Philip K Dick, reputedly a very cranky and awkward man, whose misgivings about a cinematic version of "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?" disappeared when he viewed the early rushes of "Bladerunner".
__________________
I'm beset by self-doubt ....or am I? |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Research paper on Tolkien | The Telcontarion | Writer's Workshop | 10 | 12-16-2007 12:04 PM |
Whats on your Bookshelf? | hectorberlioz | General Literature | 135 | 02-12-2007 07:26 PM |
The Jackson haters A to Z | Curufinwe | Lord of the Rings Movies | 4 | 01-25-2004 03:44 AM |
Follow on from Gandalf v. HP...Tolkien v. Peter Jackson! | Elf.Freak | Entertainment Forum | 3 | 01-22-2003 02:22 PM |
a little orientation needed | DrFledermaus | The Silmarillion | 9 | 02-12-2001 05:48 AM |