10-14-2008, 05:59 PM | #1 |
Faithful Gardener
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I walk here and there, they say...
Posts: 3,603
|
Worshipping Aslan or Tash
Okay. I realize that this could also fit into the Theology thread, but I'd like to continue focusing on this one topic, instead of moving on to other topics.
I also don't want this to be a debate-centered thread. In The Last Battle, Aslan talks to Emeth about worship. He says that because Emeth pursued Tash with integrity and good purposes in his heart and mind, he was really searching for Aslan. Because of this, Aslan took his deeds as service to himself, not Tash. He also says that whenever his own followers attempted to do an evil deed in his name, the service was attributed to Tash. Since this series of books is an allegory of the Bible, does this shed any light on how Lewis interpreted the verse that says, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Light. No man cometh unto the Father except through me." I'll finish explaining later. I've got to go home.
__________________
In God I trust, I will not be afraid. What can man do to me? Psalm 56:11 "Starbuck, what do you hear?" "Nothin' but the rain, sir!" "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." Make sure to check out the C.S. Lewis forum. Game threads, movie and book discussions and more! |
10-14-2008, 08:12 PM | #2 | ||||
Princess of the Noldor (and Administrative Empress of the Lone Islands)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Imladris (and sometimes Norway)
Posts: 3,304
|
Jesus speaks at least of the dualism - people are either with him or against him, there is no possible in between.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
"There is only one way to God, but there are many ways to Christ."
__________________
Signature picture art - Bard the Bowman - by vigshane Avatar art - Footsteps of Spring (a young Luthien) - by Henning Janssen |
||||
10-15-2008, 05:14 PM | #3 | |
Faithful Gardener
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I walk here and there, they say...
Posts: 3,603
|
Well, yes... but what of religions which don't have a Christ? Nature worshipping ones, or Eastern religions (Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.)?
Is Buddha an Eastern Christ? This has always made me wonder. As to the dualism, I've always thought that if they do not openly acknowledge Him, they get stuck in the "against" category. Even for those who do not know of His name at all. I had a teacher who once made a good point. If by our silence, they might be saved, would Christ have commanded us to go and share His name? However, I guess the real argument here is whether those Buddhists (example only) who do good deeds and in advertently follow the commands of Christ... do they, though they may have rejected the name of Christ, as Emeth had rejected the name of Aslan, hearing it spoken only in fear and hatred, do they also have the assurance of paradise? On that note, what about Quote:
But that's not consistent with the Christian idea that every human being is evil by nature and only through a relationship with Christ can one achieve holiness. Lewis threw me for a loop with this little idea of his here!
__________________
In God I trust, I will not be afraid. What can man do to me? Psalm 56:11 "Starbuck, what do you hear?" "Nothin' but the rain, sir!" "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." Make sure to check out the C.S. Lewis forum. Game threads, movie and book discussions and more! |
|
10-16-2008, 11:51 AM | #4 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Lewis is picturing here that ultimate judgment belongs only to God, Who looks upon the heart.
In regard to options in the individual case, there are 3 main ideas, in the Christian understanding from a theological perspective. I merely list them: 1) Univeralism - everyone will be saved regardless of what they do or believe; 2) Exclusivism - only those with explicit faith in Jesus the Messiah will be saved; and, 3) Inclusivism - Christ's work is full and perfect satisfaction for our sins and not for ours only but for the sins of the whole kosmos (world). There are variations, of course, and degrees of acceptance of these. CS Lewis would seem to fall under (3) in one of its variations.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
12-24-2008, 07:33 AM | #5 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: here and there
Posts: 3,514
|
This is INDEED a Narnia / Lewis thread. If you wish to debate pure unadulterated Theology do it there.
One tenuous link to Tash and Aslan, and a debate wholly NOT about Narnia are clearly separate. This board is primarily about Tolkien, and here CS lewis. There is a General section for debates like this. I therefore politely request this be either closed or moved to Theology where it clearly belongs Merry Christmas all, BB Last edited by Butterbeer : 12-24-2008 at 07:45 AM. |
12-24-2008, 03:27 PM | #6 |
Cardboard Harp of Gondor Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: IM IN UR POSTZ, EDITIN' UR WURDZ
Posts: 6,433
|
The administration will discuss this thread and decide what to do.
I personally do not have a problem with it, but we will come to a common decision. That may take a while though since I believe Valandil is off for Christmas . |
12-24-2008, 03:31 PM | #7 |
Master of Orchestration President Emeritus of Entmoot 2004-2008
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lost in the Opera House
Posts: 9,328
|
No, this is a Lewis thread. It involves theology, but so does most of Lewis' work. We can't merge half the threads here into the Theology thread.
As long as discussion stays tied to Aslan and Tash, and Lewis' intents, this thread belongs here.
__________________
ACALEWIA- President of Entmoot hectorberlioz- Vice President of Entmoot Acaly und Hektor fur Presidants fur EntMut fur life! Join the discussion at Entmoot Election 2010. "Stupidissimo!"~Toscanini The Da CINDY Code The Epic Poem Of The Balrog of Entmoot: Here ~NEW! ~ Thinking of summer vacation? AboutNewJersey.com - NJ Travel & Tourism Guide |
12-24-2008, 03:32 PM | #8 |
Faithful Gardener
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I walk here and there, they say...
Posts: 3,603
|
BB, you contradicted yourself... you said this is a Narnia/Lewis thread, and then requested that it be moved to the Theology thread.
And if you'll notice, I sincerely wanted a) no real, in-your-face debate, b) to know what people think this says about LEWIS'S beliefs, and c) the entire discussion to center on the Tash/Aslan thing and how it relates to Christ (or possibly other world religions if applicable). Aslan says in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (I think) that he IS in our world, by a different name and that the Pevensie children must learn to find him under that name. I myself choose to think that he is the Narnian embodiment of the Trinity. Others may disagree, but he's got aspects of all three. You can't hardly deeply discuss Lewis without getting into some sort of theology. That's something that anyone just has to accept.
__________________
In God I trust, I will not be afraid. What can man do to me? Psalm 56:11 "Starbuck, what do you hear?" "Nothin' but the rain, sir!" "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." Make sure to check out the C.S. Lewis forum. Game threads, movie and book discussions and more! |
12-24-2008, 04:14 PM | #9 | |
High King at Annuminas Administrator
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Wyoming - USA
Posts: 10,752
|
Quote:
Aslan is every bit as clearly a representation of Jesus Christ. The whole episode of Aslan/Tash worship is presented as a theological possibility (albeit not universally accepted) of how those who worship that which is false, from a sincere heart, will be regarded, in a Christian sense. When overlap of topics exists, there is often some leeway with just where a discussion belongs. It would certainly be appropriate for someone to discuss Lewis' beliefs in a Theology thread under the GM forum, and give a reference to this episode in the Chronicles of Narnia. It is also appropriate for someone to begin this discussion in the CS Lewis forum. Since the thread-starter did the latter, and it is an acceptable option, there is no reason to move, or merge, the thread. Doing so - in fact - would quickly cause this specific discussion to get lost in all the other subtopics which emerge in the GM Theology thread. - - - - - Oh - and Merry CHRISTmas to you - as well!
__________________
My Fanfic: Letters of Firiel Tales of Nolduryon Visitors Come to Court Ñ á ë ?* ó ú é ä ï ö Ö ñ É Þ ð ß ® ™ [Xurl=Xhttp://entmoot.tolkientrail.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=ABCXYZ#postABCXYZ]text[/Xurl] Splitting Threads is SUCH Hard Work!! |
|
06-05-2009, 01:51 PM | #10 |
Sapling
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6
|
The way I read the passiage is as such:
This man, Emeth, may have not followed the ways and teachings of Aslan, but the god that he DID follow he followed, believed and lived by the ways/teachings of his god much more closely and "religiously" than anyone else. Even moreso than those who belive is Aslan as their saviour. I honestly think (hope?) that the real God will be like this. Some people don't "reject" God by choice, but just because they have been told that THEIR religion is the right one. And if they do a better job at adhering to what their religion requires of them than we do to God, then he will recognise them as more devout follwers and more worthy of Heaven than others. It is not their fault that they believed in another religion their whole life, they had no choice. God/Aslan recognises that the commitment to this person's religion is what he wants from his own believers, so why should this person be punished just because they followed the wrong god? Their faith is stronger than anyone else's! Aslan recognises this commitment and says to the man that he may have life eternal in Aslan's World because of their dedicated belief in their religion. |
10-22-2009, 10:23 PM | #11 |
Faithful Gardener
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I walk here and there, they say...
Posts: 3,603
|
I've had a revelation about this passage: Perhaps Lewis stuck it in there to point out to the Narnians (and all the readers) that Aslan is not a local god (which is very important and also an attribute of the true God). He is the Son of the Emperor-Over-the-Sea and has children in all countries. Paul and Christ and even Peter were constantly reminding the members of the early church that Christ died for people of all nations*, not just the Jews. Why couldn't this be much the same?
Let it be noted, I do not believe that "all good people will go to heaven." But I do believe that some people from places where the name of Christ was never heard are Christians. The Bible says that the entirety of creation proclaims the name of Christ so that in the day of judgment, nobody will have an excuse. Why couldn't Emeth have been like this? He was worshipping a different god than Tash, because he was an honorable man and Tash only wanted carnage and blood. But because that was his culture, he had no other name for the god he thought was Tash. Perhaps that is what Aslan means when he says, "I take the service you have to Tash to me." *The passages using the term "all" in the general phrase "Christ died for all" were used this way. None of them mean that Christ died for all people of the world, but that Christ died for people of all nations of the world. I had noticed on NarniaWeb that there is actually a thread for this very thing and a podcast as well! Apparently I'm not the only one in this conundrum.
__________________
In God I trust, I will not be afraid. What can man do to me? Psalm 56:11 "Starbuck, what do you hear?" "Nothin' but the rain, sir!" "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." Make sure to check out the C.S. Lewis forum. Game threads, movie and book discussions and more! |