Why did Frodo depart?

[Peter_20]

SPOILER!

---

Alright, LOTR ends with the departure of Frodo, Bilbo, Gandalf and the Elves into the West, but why did Frodo depart?
I'm sure the Ring had something to do with it, but Frodo just said something like "the Shire is not saved for me", and, well, I never really understood this.
It's an extremely beautiful scene, no doubt, but could you please explain it to me?

Did Frodo break his mind when Gollum stole the Ring from him?
And in that case, what does this mean?
Did Frodo develop a kind of passion to the Ring so that he grieved losing it like that?

[Landroval]

Yes, he went there to find healing

Originally Posted by Letter #246

- Alas! there are some wounds that cannot be wholly cured, said Gandalf (III 268) – not in Middle-earth.

Frodo was sent or allowed to pass over Sea to heal him – if that could be done, before he died. He would have eventually to 'pass away': no mortal could, or can, abide for ever on earth, or within Time. So he went both to a purgatory and to a reward, for a while: a period of reflection and peace and a gaining of a truer understanding of his position in littleness and in greatness, spent still in Time amid the natural beauty of 'Arda Unmarred', the Earth unspoiled by evil.

Originally Posted by Letter #325

As for Frodo or other mortals, they could only dwell in Aman for a limited time – whether brief or long. The Valar had neither the power nor the right to confer 'immortality' upon them. Their sojourn was a 'purgatory', but one of peace and healing and they would eventually pass away (die at their own desire and of free will) to destinations of which the Elves knew nothing.

[The Gaffer]

Yes, it is a spiritual journey to rest and healing. I loved the foreshadowing of it in his dream in Tom Bombadil's house.

And, to speculate on the meaning of it all, it is to show how, in going to hell and back, a person might be so changed as to fail to recognise that which they were fighting for.

[sisterandcousinandaunt]

Tolkien was so caught up in his favorite mythology, that he couldn't envision a win without a perfect sacrifice.

"He that loses his life shall gain it" comes in, though. If Frodo had fallen into Mount Doom (a much more reasonable ending, actually, as Sam is clearly the 'everyman' of the work) Frodo would have been 'punished' for his struggle to unmake the ring. Tolkien can't have liked how that would appear (to everyone but Leif ) as random.

But Frodo was set up with only a few primary relationships. He has Bilbo. After that there's the Father, Son and (Un)Holy Ghost, Gandalf, Sam, and Smeagol. He's always portayed as distant from them, in ordinary human terms. So he's "rewarded" at the end for his sacfrifice, in a way the books audience can see.

[Landroval]

He's always portayed as distant from them, in ordinary human terms.

What do you mean he is distant from Gandalf and Sam?

[brownjenkins]

All Frodo really needed was a good Hobbit-lass.

[sisterandcousinandaunt]

even more after he becomes the White Rider. But he was hardly swapping tales in the Green Dragon with Frodo, even before then. Frodo is described as living alone, but with many friends...Folco, Fredegar, Merry and Pippin..."more often he wandered by himself". At the long expected party he was 33...he doesn't leave until 50.

His relationship with Sam clearly develops on the trip. He's much older, even in Hobbit terms, and Sam is his yard guy. Sam isn't among the invited guests to that last Bag End birthday, even.

So Frodo's a guy who, like his uncle, isn't settling down at the expected age. He just lives on his trust fund and pals around with much younger cousins. He doesn't actually "let his hair down" much, I think.

He can't 'lose the Shire' in the same way that someone with an actual bet on the table could.

Originally Posted by Landroval

What do you mean he is distant from Gandalf and Sam?