|
04-26-2011, 12:26 PM | #1 |
Sapling
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
|
What did Jackson do right?
All to often on these forums people gripe about what Jackson got wrong. Rather than get bent out of shape about it I am just happy that someone actually made the movies at all.
Now don't get me wrong I get as annoyed at some of these as anyone, particularly the overhaul of Aragorn's attitude toward his possible kingship, but he did get some things right. For example: The Shelob-Sam fight. That scene is one of my favorites from the book and I love Jackson's representation of that fight. It had the right amounts of giant creepy spider and Sam's doughty determination. The general feel of the Nazgul. They are just as sinister and foreboding as I imagined them from the books. The use of Sindarin. This could have easily been left out, but anywhere it was appropriate to have characters speak in Sindarin, they did so. Not knowing Sindarin myself I can't speak for the accuracy of what they said but I like the fact that they went to the trouble to do so. The scenery in general, specifically I like Parth Galen and Amon Hen, the toppled statues and ruined stonework give the feel of a great civilization in decline. Last edited by Thu : 04-26-2011 at 12:31 PM. Reason: typo |
04-26-2011, 03:07 PM | #2 |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Welcome to the Entmoot, Thu.
The costumes and weaponry in general were awesome. The Lighting of the Beacons was pretty memorable too. But to be honest, I'm getting annoyed about how people are apparently not allowed to not like the Jackson movies. If someone mentions something they don't like about the movies, they're either griping, moaning, getting bent out of shape, ungrateful, and even possibly just jealous. But it's never just people who happen to have a different opinion.
__________________
We are not things. |
04-26-2011, 05:37 PM | #3 | |
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
An example to illustrate that what one person thinks Jackson got right, another can think he got wrong.
Quote:
And Jackson not only largely substituted Neo-Sindarin for actual Sindarin (its arguable accuracy or inaccuracy aside), he largely substituted a different 'order' of Sindarin, too. So I don't agree he got this right, and what he could have done was simply use actual Sindarin right out of the book, and use it where Tolkien thought it was needed for the tale. This seems simpler and cheaper... I would guess! Last edited by Galin : 04-27-2011 at 11:45 AM. |
|
04-26-2011, 09:20 PM | #4 |
Sapling
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
|
Fair enough.
As I said, I don't know enough of the elvish languages to make any kind of argument as to weather or not the Sindarin was used correctly. What I liked about it was that they recognized that language was an important part of the book and tried to make the elvish language part of the movie when it would have been much easier to leave it out. The more I think about it the things I like are mainly about the feel of the movie. I feel like they did a good job making middle earth come to life. The scenery, costuming and music were all well done. It's when I start to look at particulars that I begin to get annoyed. @earniel: I am absolutely not trying to say that anyone who doesn't like the movies is griping, moaning etc. I just think that on these boards in particular that Jackson gets raked over the coals for the things he did wrong (and rightly so) and never gets credit for what he did right. I just wanted to at least have a venue for people to recognize that he did do some things right. |
04-27-2011, 05:01 AM | #5 | |
The Chocoholic Sea Elf Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: N?n in Eilph (Belgium)
Posts: 14,363
|
Quote:
__________________
We are not things. |
|
04-27-2011, 09:22 AM | #6 | ||||
Elven Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 222
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
That doesn't seem that hard to me. Jackson made it arguably harder by inventing things for Elves to say in Elvish, then hiring someone to invent the Elvish -- then of course, coaching the actors on delivery and pronunciation. I'll say this much: in general the flavour of the Neo-Sindarin reflects the flavour of Sindarin. In other words, good Neo-Sindarin sounds like Sindarin at least. But again, obviously so does actual Sindarin sound like Sindarin Last edited by Galin : 04-27-2011 at 12:12 PM. |
||||
04-27-2011, 10:48 PM | #7 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
While he may not have done a perfect rendition of Lord of the Rings, he did the best to date, and he brought a level of excellence to the fantasy movie genre that was sorely needed. He brought it to a new level, much like Kubrick did with 2001 for scifi, and that's a legacy they may ultimately be as big as Tolkien's was for written fantasy.
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
04-28-2011, 05:14 PM | #8 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
Hired a really good prop company.
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
02-04-2012, 02:40 AM | #9 | |
of the House of Fëanor
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 6,150
|
Quote:
THIS!! I absolutely concur.
__________________
Few people have the imagination for reality.
~Johann Wolfgang von Goethe |
|
04-26-2011, 11:52 PM | #10 |
Dread Mothy Lord and Halfwitted Apprentice Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Thomas Aquinas College, Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 10,820
|
What did Jackson do right?
Lose weight.
__________________
Crux fidelis, inter omnes arbor una nobilis. Nulla talem silva profert, fronde, flore, germine. Dulce lignum, dulce clavo, dulce pondus sustinens. 'With a melon?' - Eric Idle |
04-27-2011, 06:00 AM | #11 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Visualisation (with some notable exceptions), production design was uniformly excellent, casting was mostly good (also some notable exceptions).
FWIW I felt that he didn't make enough changes to the story. |
05-20-2011, 05:26 AM | #12 |
Hobbit
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Beneath the waves.
Posts: 27
|
I agree with those who have mentioned the sets - the conceptual designers on the movie were amazing; the amount of dedication and attention to detail really shows. Jackson employed Alan Lee and John Howe, illustrators of many of the most beautiful editions of Tolkien's work, as I'm sure many of you know. I particularly loved Rivendell and Gondor, felt Lorien was a bit of a let down (the main shots of the place are only in the extended version, disappointingly - they had some really great ideas).
The battle scenes in general - particularly Helm's Deep - were pretty revolutionary. I've watched a lot of other things made since where all the battle scenes just seem to be variations on Helm's Deep. Also I thought the casting was great. There was a great dynamic between the Fellowship. The only weak links were people like Celeborn. |
10-16-2011, 11:16 PM | #13 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LI-woods, NY
Posts: 653
|
Au contraire.
I think Marton Csokas as Celeborn was a very good choice. He portrayed the royal elf quite right - a great lord among his people, sindar-elves, he is his pedigreed wife's man when an ambitious, power-hungry Galadriel is stepping up. In a few moments on the screen and without much words he managed to relate to viewers much more than the movie would allowed.
__________________
Uruk-hai, or the journey to there. Last edited by Olmer : 10-17-2011 at 07:30 PM. |
10-17-2011, 03:07 AM | #14 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Agree, he was OK. Celeborn in the book is a bit of a damp squib anyway.
Aragorn was the biggest casting goof, IMO. Sean Bean would have been better. Not convinced about Ian McKellen either. |
11-01-2011, 08:15 PM | #15 | |
Cyber Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Left of Rock, Right of Hard Place
Posts: 986
|
Boromir and Sam were well done.
Scenery, music, costumes and props were well done. Chose NZ as location for filming the three films. Movies are good fantasy movies. As an adaptation of LOTR, the movies fall short of the mark. With the resources available to PJ&Co., I was hoping for a better adaption of LOTR. Quote:
__________________
Sincerely, Anthony 'Many are my names in many countries,' he said. 'Mithrandir among the Elves, Tharkûn to the Drarves; Olórin I was in my youth in the West that is forgotten, in the South Incánus, in the North Gandalf; to the East I go not.' Faramir What nobler employment, or more valuable to the state, than that of the man who instructs the rising generation? Cicero (106BC-43BC) |
|
11-02-2011, 06:01 AM | #16 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
|
11-02-2011, 01:33 PM | #17 | |
Cyber Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Left of Rock, Right of Hard Place
Posts: 986
|
Quote:
The actor did an excellent job portraying Boromir.
__________________
Sincerely, Anthony 'Many are my names in many countries,' he said. 'Mithrandir among the Elves, Tharkûn to the Drarves; Olórin I was in my youth in the West that is forgotten, in the South Incánus, in the North Gandalf; to the East I go not.' Faramir What nobler employment, or more valuable to the state, than that of the man who instructs the rising generation? Cicero (106BC-43BC) |
|
11-03-2011, 10:18 AM | #18 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
Agreed, even though he doesn't look anything like I imagined Boromir.
There were a couple of shaky moments, like when he goes mad and tries to take the Ring. But a couple of his lines - "Gondor has no king; Gondor needs no king", "It is a strange fate that we should suffer so much fear and doubt over so small a thing." - were brilliant. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__...oromir34_b.jpg I think I read somewhere that he was after the role of Aragorn, and to be honest I think he would have been far better for it than Viggo. Edit - dunno why that image doesn't display inline. Maybe the target site has disabled it or something. Last edited by The Gaffer : 11-03-2011 at 10:20 AM. |
12-07-2011, 03:42 AM | #19 |
Half-Elven Princess of Rabbit Trails and Harp-Wielding Administrator (beware the Rubber Chicken of Doom!)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Not where I want to be ...
Posts: 15,254
|
I've never recovered from whathisname as Elrond - horrible, IMHO. He looked like he was cranky about being constipated. No hint of the noble lord who was "noble and as fair in face as an elf-lord, as strong as a warrior, as wise as a wizard, as venerable as a king of dwarves, and as kind as summer."
__________________
. I should be doing the laundry, but this is MUCH more fun! Ñá ë?* óú éä ïöü Öñ É Þ ð ß ® ç å ™ æ ♪ ?* "How lovely are Thy dwelling places, O Lord of hosts! ... For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand outside." (from Psalm 84) * * * God rocks! Entmoot : Veni, vidi, velcro - I came, I saw, I got hooked! Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium, sed ego sum homo indomitus! Run the earth and watch the sky ... Auta i lómë! Aurë entuluva! |
12-07-2011, 07:04 AM | #20 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: In me taters
Posts: 3,288
|
While I agree with your words, I actually liked the way he was portrayed - the cynical old campaigner. However that was a failure of ambition on the part of the director. The character, as it was, was well-played.
I think in film you have to, in some ways, be more explicit about a character's motives. They had to get some aspect of Elrond across, and it had to make sense in the context of the film they were making, so his character was trimmed to fit. In the book, we never really get an explanation for why Elrond doesn't "do more" to fight Sauron, and we don't find out about his loss/sacrifice of Arwen until the end. But we don't need one because the elves' tragedy is richly fed to us via songs, stories and description. Without that, the film needs to explain why Elrond sits in his house all day. Hence "men are weak" etc. So the error was with the script - for clumsiness - and the director - for not having the bollocks to try to portray the tragedy of the elves' long defeat and the dignity of Elrond. It's a shame, I think it could have been done, but they would have had to make much more drastic changes to the story. And maybe got a different director |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Jackson haters A to Z | Curufinwe | Lord of the Rings Movies | 4 | 01-25-2004 03:44 AM |
If Jackson made "The Silmarillion the Movie" | jerseydevil | Lord of the Rings Movies | 86 | 01-16-2004 08:53 PM |
Jackson "Lord of the Rings"-es New Film Based on The Bible | bropous | Lord of the Rings Movies | 8 | 12-07-2003 05:20 AM |
Is Jackson a hack? | jerseydevil | Lord of the Rings Movies | 31 | 12-06-2003 12:39 PM |
Peter Jackson has improved Tolkien | Black Breathalizer | Lord of the Rings Movies | 419 | 11-05-2002 11:05 PM |