|
FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-09-2009, 04:01 PM | #1 |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Our Planet's Future - Living Green and Healthy
Our Planet's Future - Living Green and Healthy
"Let us now say that we give everything collective a serious boost. Walking to the bus station, taking the bus or train more often, and then walking the remainder of the way to your work.. that in itself makes for a very little loss of comfort in comparison with driving the car to work. What do we get?... Less car traffic and some very pleasant side-effects: The air becomes cleaner in your neighbourhood, the noise level drops, there are less accidents, and just think about how much quicker your local bus or tram gets along with all those cars gone from the street" - Ottar Brox, Norwegian political scientist I dedicate this thread to discussing all things green. In fact, it's not only green.. but also blue, and red, and yellow, and white, and all the other fresh colours nature endows us with free of charge. All it asks in return is that we do not pollute it, ravage it, burn it, destroy it. When we do we forget it and that's a change in mindset that is needed (speaking as an European) in the Western world. We also forget that developing our urban lives to a healthier shade of green does not neccessarily mean undoing all the pleasant things we've come to enjoy, but on the contrary can provide just the sort of balance that our bodies and minds have been equipped with by nature. American environmentalist Sophie Uliano, and author of 'Gorgeously Green' writes (I've translated from a Norwegian translation in an article): "My mission is to help women understand that living green is absolutely possible for every single woman on this planet. I've found that a green lifestyle does not mean forsaking. Living green involves everything you get: A better figure, a better economy, a better immune system, a better society - the list goes on and on" --------------- I'm going to try to add a lot more of the things I've read about over the past 6 months or so, from everything to Cormac Cullinan's 'Wild Law' to the forthcoming Copenhagen Climate Negotiations on December 7th to 18th 2009. It will hopefully replace the Kyoto Agreement so that every single nation on the planet comes around to agreeing how we solve the Earth's climate problem. I hope this thread evolves into lengthy discussions, debates, with points of views from all corners of the world and every idea you ever had about climate problems, a greener world and last but not least... whether we can pull it off in time.
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." Last edited by Coffeehouse : 03-09-2009 at 04:05 PM. |
03-09-2009, 10:05 PM | #2 |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Our less than green understanding
Four point of views to think about... "Since so many people are moving into the cities for so many reasons, partly due to lack of food and water, looking for a better life, there is a tendency to become more and more disconnected from why we need the biosphere." "We are becoming more and more ecological illiterates, about those key processes on which we depend for our well-being. Actually we've gone so far that we almost believe that we are independent of the biosphere. That the whole biosphere, the environment, is just a matter of whether we like it or not.. And that's indeed a tragic view of the future" "And it has also meant that we've developed a view of the environment as one system and human society as being another. And then we talk about the environmental issues as something we should care about for the sake of the environment. But in my view that's the wrong cut. The right cut is really to say that we are part of the biosphere.. we are depending on it." - Professor Carl Folke, University of Stockholm, Sweden "We think amphibians are good indicators. They have very thin skin which they have to breath through, so they will be much more susceptible to chemicals. They also produce eggs which are completely exposed to the outside world, they haven't got a shell. The tadpoles are also very thin-skinned and small. So if there's anything out there you'd expect an amphibian to be affected by it. At the moment we think there are about 5,500 species of amphibians on Earth, and about 1/3 of those are in decline and may be heading for extinction, and indeed some have actually gone extinct. And I think amphibians are telling us something important about what is going on. Where you have habitat destruction then there is no surprise that amphibians are in decline. But there are larger parts in the world which have been established to protect biodiversity, nature reserves like this one, and great national parks, with the idea that in those parts of the world animals and plants would be safe. Yet still the amphibians decline there. And that's being repeated all over the world.. South America, North America, Australia, Africa. So there's something happening to the whole of the world so you can't say that we can have bits of the world for animals and bits of the world for humans. We have to take a global view of the world.. we have to treat the world as one large system." - Professor Tim Halliday, The Open University, United Kingdom "There is a very strong agreement among leading biologists right around the world that we are into the opening phase of a mass extinction of species, there is no doubt at all about that. We are the only species in the whole history of the Earth that has the power to drive even one species extinct, and we may well end up driving 5 million species extinct." - Professor Normann Myers, University of Oxford, United Kingdom "The mass extinction that is taking place today is absolutely unprecedented in human history. Humanity came onto the scene as a major force when the Earth's diversity of life was at its highest ever, in its entire history, and we're now wiping it out in the lowest point millions of years." - Professor Gretchen Daily, University of Standford, United States of America
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." Last edited by Coffeehouse : 03-09-2009 at 10:18 PM. |
03-10-2009, 12:01 PM | #3 |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Here is an extension of remarks by Professor N. Myers, and his assessment, while not definitive, it goes to show just how far off the mark the common awareness we have of the destruction that has been caused to our world. This isn't about saving the world for our grandchildren any longer. It's about saving the world for our kids.. and us.
"The mass extinction that is taking place right now amounts to something of a bothic holocaust. Not only because of the sheer number of species that we are driving extinct, but because of the impoverishment for the planetary ecosystem. These species provide us with an awful lot of what you might call environmental services.. Now, if we lose half of all mammals and birds, it would be a great shame, but we could probably get by. But if we lose half of all insects we shall be in a lot of trouble." Professor Normann Myers, University of Oxford, United Kingdom My view is that we have to take this in on ourselves now. Politicians need to understand that going green now can't be a campaign promise, but a neccessity. It's not if we need it, it's not when we need, it's.. we need to 'go green'.. Here I can find nothing better to say but quote an African saying: "The best time to plant a tree was years ago".
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." Last edited by Coffeehouse : 03-10-2009 at 12:03 PM. |
03-10-2009, 09:53 PM | #4 |
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Reality
Posts: 3,767
|
The only real effective step has nothing to do with green and everything to do with population control.
Personally, I think we'd be better off planning for a future that is inevitably going to be much less "green" than today and making the best of it. Prioritize what we can save instead of pretending that we can save it all.
__________________
Your reality, sir, is lies and balderdash and I'm delighted to say that I have no grasp of it whatsoever. |
03-11-2009, 07:12 AM | #5 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
It's also a lot more complicated than 'prioritize what we can save', because we don't know what we should save and what we can leave hanging up dry. Indeed the entire problem we're facing is that the biosphere is a massively linked chain, and we have absolutely no idea what parts of the chain that we can afford losing and which ones that could cause real problems..
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." |
|
03-11-2009, 11:44 AM | #6 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,535
|
CH, my friend, you are SO theoretical. Any chance you'll talk about what you're actually DOING for the environemnt, other than surfing the web?
For example, I maintain a bit of habitat, replacing invasive non-native plants with native species. I heat water for bathing mostly with wood fallen in the yard. I've been a vegetarian for...well, quite a while. I'm micro-farming, and teach sustainable methods for the food cycle. I've reconfigured the south side of the house to increase our solar use, and this spring I'm building solar collectors for more hot water. I've reduced our gas usage by 10% this year over last, despite it being a colder year. I live in a community that was designed on the garden-cities concept, and prioritizes walking. We're looking at ways, as a community, to reduce our carbon footprint. I spend a lot of time pre-purposing items that would otherwise be junked. We donate all our hand-me downs to the local clothing bank. So. Let's share what we are doing, rather than debate the importance again. We have a thread for that.
__________________
That would be the swirling vortex to another world. Cool. I want one. TMNT No, I'm not emo. I just have a really poor sense of direction. (Thanks to katya for this quote) This is the best news story EVER! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26087293/ “Often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”...John McCain "I shall go back. And I shall find that therapist. And I shall whack her upside her head with my blanket full of rocks." ...Louisa May |
03-11-2009, 01:14 PM | #7 | |
Entmoot Minister of Foreign Affairs
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 2,145
|
Quote:
All the things you do are great ways to improve the environment, and like I quoted earlier, it doesn't have to be a downside.. quite the opposite. For my own sake, I don't have a car and I have never driven a car.. ever (except in my dreams) Why? Because I have never taken the drivers licence, and there's never been a reason to. Unlike many my age I don't need to empty my wallet driving a few meters or polluting the 2 km between my apartment and the University. Instead I use public transport and my bicycle. I intend to wait with a driver's licence until I am finished with my education.. and that first car of mine will be electric
__________________
"Well, thief! I smell you and I feel your air. I hear your breath. Come along! Help yourself again, there is plenty and to spare." Last edited by Coffeehouse : 03-11-2009 at 01:20 PM. |
|
09-16-2009, 08:24 PM | #8 |
Elf Lord
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sikeston, MO, usa, earth, sol
Posts: 3,114
|
__________________
Inked "Aslan is not a tame lion." CSL/LWW "The new school [acts] as if it required...courage to say a blasphemy. There is only one thing that requires real courage to say, and that is a truism." GK Chesterton "And there is always the danger of allowing people to suppose that our modern times are so wholly unlike any other times that the fundamental facts about man's nature have wholly changed with changing circumstances." Dorothy L. Sayers, 1 Sept. 1941 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|